Table 2 Cross sectional comparisons of NLR by group
From: Evaluation of visual acuity in dry AMD patients after microcurrent electrical stimulation
Time point | Treatment group mean (SD) | Sham control group mean (SD) | Treatment-Sham control difference (95% CI)* | Treatment-Sham control P-value (H0: difference = 0)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 19.6 (8.9) | 24.2 (7.1) | − 4.6 (− 9.1, − 0.0) | 0.048 |
T2 | 24.0 (8.7) | 23.7 (7.1) | 0.3 (− 4.2, 4.8) | 0.891 |
T3 | 26.3 (8.8) | 24.1 (6.6) | 2.2 (− 2.2, 6.7) | 0.318 |
T4 | 27.4 (8.9) | 24.1 (6.6) | 3.4 (− 1.1, 7.9) | 0.138 |
E1 | 27.6 (9.1) | 24.2 (7.2) | 3.1 (− 1.6, 7.8) | 0.189 |
T5 | 26.4 (8.2) | 23.3 (6.6) | 3.0 (− 1.3, 7.2) | 0.169 |
E2 | 26.2 (8.4) | 21.7 (7.6) | 3.8 (− 0.6, 8.2) | 0.089 |
T6 | 26.0 (8.1) | 22.3 (7.1) | 3.8 (− 0.5, 8.1) | 0.080 |
E3 | 27.8 (8.4) | 22.1 (7.4) | 5.8 (1.4, 10.3) | 0.011 |