Table 4 Cross sectional comparisons of CS by group
From: Evaluation of visual acuity in dry AMD patients after microcurrent electrical stimulation
Time point | Treatment group mean (SD) | Sham control group mean (SD) | Treatment-Sham control contrast (95% CI)a | Treatment-Sham control P-value (H0: difference = 0)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1.00 (0.24) | 1.11 (0.17) | − 0.12 (− 0.24, 0.01) | 0.062 |
T2 | 1.13 (0.22) | 1.14 (0.20) | − 0.01 (− 0.12, 0.10) | 0.860 |
T3 | 1.19 (0.21) | 1.14 (0.21) | 0.06 (− 0.06, 0.17) | 0.337 |
T4 | 1.23 (0.22) | 1.16 (0.22) | 0.08 (− 0.04, 0.20) | 0.179 |
E1 | 1.20 (0.20) | 1.18 (0.26) | 0.03 (− 0.09, 0.14) | 0.661 |
T5 | 1.20 (0.22) | 1.13 (0.25) | 0.06 (− 0.06, 0.18) | 0.332 |
E2 | 1.23 (0.20) | 1.09 (0.26) | 0.10 (− 0.02, 0.22) | 0.112 |
T6 | 1.24 (0.21) | 1.08 (0.22) | 0.16 (0.04, 0.28) | 0.009 |
E3 | 1.24 (0.21) | 1.11 (0.24) | 0.13 (0.01, 0.25) | 0.034 |