Table 5 Mean changes in CS vs. T1 by group
From: Evaluation of visual acuity in dry AMD patients after microcurrent electrical stimulation
Time points | Treatment group contrast (95% CI)a | Sham control group contrast (95% CI)a | Treatment-Sham control contrast (95% CI)a | Treatment-Sham control P-value (H0: difference = 0)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
T2-T1 | 0.13 (0.09, 0.16) | 0.02 (− 0.03, 0.08) | 0.11 (0.04, 0.17) | 0.002 |
T3-T1 | 0.20 (0.15, 0.24) | 0.02 (− 0.04, 0.09) | 0.17 (0.09, 0.25) | < 0.001 |
T4-T1 | 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) | 0.04 (− 0.02, 0.10) | 0.20 (0.12, 0.27) | < 0.001 |
E1-T1 | 0.20 (0.15, 0.25) | 0.06 (− 0.02, 0.13) | 0.14 (0.05, 0.23) | 0.002 |
T5-T1 | 0.19 (0.14, 0.24) | 0.02 (− 0.06, 0.10) | 0.18 (0.08, 0.27) | 0.001 |
E2-T1 | 0.20 (0.15, 0.25) | − 0.02 (− 0.09, 0.06) | 0.21 (0.13, 0.30) | < 0.001 |
T6-T1 | 0.24 (0.19, 0.29) | − 0.03 (− 0.11, 0.04) | 0.28 (0.19, 0.37) | < 0.001 |
E3-T1 | 0.24 (0.19, 0.29) | − 0.01 (− 0.08, 0.06) | 0.25 (0.16, 0.34) | < 0.001 |