Skip to main content

Table 2 Postoperative complications and adverse events that occurred after different treatments

From: Pneumatic vitreolysis versus vitrectomy for the treatment of vitreomacular traction syndrome and macular holes: complication analysis and systematic review with meta-analysis of functional outcomes

Adverse events and various complications reported

Study

Intervention

Postoperative complications (% of cases)

Benz et al. [37]

Ocriplasmin

Cataracts or lens changes (16%), RT without RD (12%), intraoperative/postoperative RD (2%)

Coskey et al. [38]

Ocriplasmin

Worsening of anatomy/vision (25%), developed FTMH (9.6%)

Dihowm et al. [39]

PPV

RD (2.8%), cataract progression/formation (67.6%)

Dugel et al. [40]

Ocriplasmin

Vitreous floaters (37.7%), photopsia (29.5%), color vision test abnormal (28.8%), ophthalmological examination abnormal (19.9%), blurred vision (18.5%)

Han et al. [41]

PV

One eye had localized RD 2 months after surgery

Feng et al. [42]

Ocriplasmin

Development of SFL (33%), post injection EZD (33%), FTMH base enlargement (94%), photopsia (94%), dyschromatopsia (18%), visual blurring (49%)

Kaiser et al. [43]

Ocriplasmin

Vitreous floaters (17.6%), conjunctival hemorrhage (14.6%), eye pain (13.3%), photopsia (12.0%), RT (0.2%), RD (2.4%), retinal edema (5.4%), macular edema (4.1%), increased IOP (3.9%), cataract (2.6%)

Hejsek et al. [44]

25G PPV

Rhegmatogenous RD (3.3%), cataract (0.2%)

Juncal et al. [32]

23 or 25-gauge PPV

EZD (100%), outer segment reflectivity changes (90.9)

 

Ocriplasmin

EZD (81.8%), outer segment reflectivity changes (63.6%)

Lim et al. [45]

Ocriplasmin

Photopsia (15%), developed MH (5%), RT (1.4%), RD (1.9%), retinal pigment, epithelium changes (2.9%)

Muqit et al. [46]

Ocriplasmin

No adverse events reported

Nudleman et al. [47]

Ocriplasmin

SRF (73%), EZ changes (56%)

Quezada-Ruiz et al. [48]

Ocriplasmin

Changes in outer band reflectivity (43.47%)

Schumann et al. [49]

Ocriplasmin

SRF (30.5%), cystoid macular edema (6.1%), RD (4.9%), lamellar macular defect (1.2%)

Sharma et al. [50]

Ocriplasmin

EZ changes (47%), reopening of MH (2.9%)

Stalmans et al. [11]

Ocriplasmin

Vitreous floaters (16.8%), photopsia (11.8%), conjunctival hemorrhage (14.6%), injection-related eye pain (13.5%), blurred vision (8.6%), visual impairment (5.4%), increased IOP (3.9%), RT (1.3%), cataract (5.6%), MH (5.2%), RD (0.4%), reduced VA (0.6%)

Stalmans et al. [51]

Ocriplasmin

Drug ineffective (8.5%), vitreous floaters (7.4%), photopsia (7.4%), reduced VA (5.3%)

Willekens et al. [52]

Ocriplasmin

RD (2.6%), SRF (36.8%)

Kumar et al. [29]

PV

In the PV group, 26.66% (4/15) of eyes had a FTMH. Seven eyes required reoperation (four for FTMH and three for unresolved VMT). The PPV group had complications that required reoperation. No endophthalmitis, cataract progression, lenticular dislocation, zonular dehiscence, or uncontrollable increase in intraocular pressure was encountered in either group

 

PPV

 

Primavera et al. [53]

PV

No serious complications were observed

Čokl et al. [54]

PV

Peripheral RT with localized RD in one eye and a small FTMH with a diameter of 220 microns in another eye were observed one week after C3F8 injection. After one month, another eye with a MH of 330 microns was found in this group (complication rate: 3/29 eyes, 10.3%). A small MH with a diameter of 225 microns was also found in one eye from the SF6 group at the one-week follow-up (1/28 eyes, 3.6%)

Wickens et al. [55]

PPV

No serious complications were observed

Alreshaid [30]

PPV

One patient had a lamellar MH after PPV, and 1 patient had a worse BCVA after ocriplasmin injection

 

Ocriplasmin

 

Anderson et al. [56]

Ocriplasmin

Complications, including transient loss of vision, transient disruption of the EZ or subfoveal lucency on OCT, increased MH base diameter, and electroretinographic abnormalities, were observed

 

PPV

No serious complications were observed

Greven et al. [31]

Ocriplasmin

Rhegmatogenous RD (4.3%), PVR (2.1%), intraoperative RT (4.3%), PVR detachment (2.1%) intraoperative RT (5.0%). No eyes in the PPV only group developed a rhegmatogenous RD

 

PPV

 

Nambiar et al. [33]

Ocriplasmin

The need for subsequent vitrectomy was lower in the PV group. Novel PV treatment appears to be a more effective and inexpensive option than EVL in this cohort of patients, with fewer patients requiring subsequent vitrectomy

 

PPV

 

Sharma et al. [50]

Ocriplasmin

One eye with a FTMH underwent pharmacologic closure, but then reopened after 2 years. There were no cases of permanent visual loss in this series

Steel et al. [57]

Ocriplasmin

Photopsia (9.8%) and vitreous floaters (6.8%) were the most frequent adverse events

Steinle et al. [35]

Ocriplasmin

EVL with had a lower success rate than C3F8, and IVO showed significant ORB changes on SD-OCT. Thus, a C3F8 intravitreal injection appeared to be a safe, inexpensive, and effective option for the treatment of VMT

 

PV

 

Zandi et al. [58]

Ocriplasmin

No serious complications were observed

Baumann et al. [59]

PV

RD occurred in 4 of 47 (8.5%) eyes of the total cohort within a 4-week period, and MHs formed in 4/33 (12.1%) eyes

Fouad et al. [23]

PV

One eye had a RT after PV at upper nasal retina that resulted from vitreous hemorrhage after two weeks of injections

Özdemir et al. [20]

PV

One of 13 eyes had a post procedural RT, and 1 patient had gas migration to the anterior chamber

  1. BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; C3F8, perfluoropropane; EZ, ellipsoid zone; EZD, ellipsoid zone deformities; EVL, enzymatic vitreolysis; FTMH, full-thickness macular hole; IOL, intraocular pressure; IVO, intravitreal ocriplasmin; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; ORB, outer retinal band; PV, pneumatic vitreolysis; PVR, proliferative vitreoretinopathy; MH, macular hole; RD, retinal detachment; RT, retinal tear; SF6, sulfur hexafluoride; SFL, subfoveal lucency; SRF, subretinal fluid; SD-OCT, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography; VA, visual acuity; VMT, vitreomacular traction