Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and history information, visual acuity, and inner nuclear lesions presence in cases and controls

From: Are inner nuclear layer ischemic lesions hidden indicators of retinal vein occlusion risk? A case-control study

Characteristic

Overall (N = 69)

RVO group (N = 37)

Control group (N = 32)

p-value 1

q-value 2

  

95% CI

 

95% CI

 

95% CI 1

  

Age, mean (SD)

60.16 (7.75)

 

60.95 (8.43)

58–64

59.25 (6.90)

57–62

0.4

0.5

Gender, n (%)

      

0.08

0.15

F

26 (37.68%)

27–50%

10 (27.03%)

14–44%

16 (50%)

34–66%

  

M

43 (62.32%)

50–73%

27 (72.97%)

56–86%

16 (50%)

34–66%

  

IHD, n (%)

18 (26.09%)

17–38%

11 (29.73%)

16–47%

7 (21.88%)

9.9–40%

0.6

0.7

DM, n (%)

16 (23.19%)

14–35%

12 (32.43%)

19–50%

4 (12.50%)

4.1–30%

0.085

0.15

VA LogMAR, median (range)

0.046 (0.0–0.155)

0.097 (0.0–0.155)

0.046 (0.0–0.097)

< 0.001

< 0.001

INL lesions presence, n (%)

30 (43.48%)

32–56%

26 (70.27%)

53–84%

4 (12.50%)

4.1–30%

< 0.001

< 0.001

  1. 1- Welch Two Sample t-test; Mann-Whitney U test; Fisher’s exact test
  2. 2- False discovery rate correction for multiple testing
  3. Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; IHD, ischemic heart disease; INL, inner nuclear layer; LogMAR, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution M, male; N, number; RVO, retinal vein occlusion; VA, visual acuity