Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of eyes with and without evident inner nuclear layer lesions

From: Are inner nuclear layer ischemic lesions hidden indicators of retinal vein occlusion risk? A case-control study

Characteristic

With INL lesions

(N = 30)

Without INL Lesions

(N = 39)

p-value 1

q-value 2

  

95% CI

 

95% CI 1

  

Group, n (%)

    

< 0.001

< 0.001*

RVO

26 (86.67%)

68–96%

11 (28.21%)

16–45%

  

Control

4 (13.33%)

4.4–32%

28 (71.79%)

55–84%

  

Age, mean (SD)

62.27 (9.22)

59, 66

58.54 (6.03)

57, 60

0.061

0.1

Gender, n (%)

    

0.13

0.2

F

8 (26.67%)

13–46%

18 (46.15%)

30–63%

  

M

22 (73.33%)

54–87%

21 (53.85%)

37–70%

  

IHD, n (%)

10 (33.33%)

18–53%

8 (20.51%)

9.9–37%

0.3

0.3

DM, n (%)

9 (30%)

15–50%

7 (17.95%)

8.1–34%

0.3

0.3

VA LogMAR, median (range)

0.097 (0.0–0.155)

0.046 (0.0–0.155)

< 0.001

< 0.001

RVO type, n (%)

    

< 0.001

< 0.001*

None

4 (13.33%)

4.4–32%

28 (71.79%)

55–84%

  

BRVO

15 (50%)

33–67%

7 (17.95%)

8.1–34%

  

CRVO

11 (36.67%)

21–56%

4 (10.26%)

3.3–25%

  
  1. 1- Welch Two Sample t-test; Mann-Whitney U test; Fisher’s exact test
  2. 2- False discovery rate correction for multiple testing
  3. Abbreviations: BRVO, branch retinal vein occlusion; CRVO, central retinal vein occlusion; DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; IHD, ischemic heart disease; INL, inner nuclear layer; LogMAR, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution M, male; N, number; RVO, retinal vein occlusion; VA, visual acuity