Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of the whole group

From: The outcomes of epiretinal membrane peeling in patients with foveal herniation

Patient no. Age Gender Follow-op, months Lens status Cataract surgery Preop BCVA, LogMAR Month 12 BCVA, LogMAR Preop CRT, µ Month 12 CRT, µ Peeled membrane Tamponade Postop foveal contour Complication
1 64 Female 18 Phakic 1.00 0.52 540 324 ERM + ILM SIVI Incomplete Cataract
2 68 Male 14 Phakic + 0.52 0.70 381 388 ERM + ILM HAVA Absent
3 61 Female 13 Phakic + 0.52 0.15 421 336 ERM SIVI Incomplete
4 61 Female 14 Phakic 0.70 0.52 556 350 ERM SIVI Incomplete Cataract
5 61 Female 12 Phakic 0.70 0.70 268 264 ERM + ILM SIVI Complete
6 65 Female 18 Pseud 0.52 0.50 554 170 ERM + ILM C3F8 Complete RD
7 80 Male 20 Pseud 0.70 0.60 333 339 ERM + ILM C3F8 Complete
8 61 Female 14 Pseud 0.52 0.40 581 347 ERM + ILM SIVI Incomplete
9 63 Female 14 Pseud 0.52 0.52 590 181 ERM + ILM HAVA Complete
10 65 Female 14 Phakic 0.52 0.30 660 333 ERM + ILM SF6 Incomplete Cataract
11 67 Male 12 Pseud 0.40 0.50 358 291 ERM HAVA Complete
  1. no, number; BCVA; preop, peroperative; best corrected visual acuity; CRT, central retinal thickness; postop, postoperative; ERM, epiretinal mebrane; ILM, internal limiting membrane