Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between complete PVD and the other

From: Influence of vitreomacular interface score on treatment outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

 

Complete PVD

The other

P-value

Eyes, n (patients, n)

43 (43)

16 (16)

 

Age, years

75.7 ± 7.3

70.7 ± 8.3

0.03*

Sex (M/F), n

29/14

12/4

0.58

Subtype (tAMD/PCV)

20/23

10/6

0.28

Axial length, mm

23.81 ± 0.88

23.54 ± 1.01

0.31

LogMAR BCVA

 Baseline

0.32 ± 0.34

0.16 ± 0.25

0.10

 1 year after treatment

0.22 ± 0.38

0.06 ± 0.24

0.11

 Change during 1 year

− 0.08 ± 0.25

− 0.15 ± 0.31

0.37

Central retinal thickness at baseline, μm

275.4 ± 115.1

293.9 ± 112.0

0.58

Subfoveal choroidal thickness at baseline, μm

206.2 ± 93.9

300.5 ± 127.6

0.003*

1-year retinal exudate status (wet/dry)

11/32

1/15

0.10

Genotype, n

 ARMS2 A69S (GG/GT/TT)

8/19/14a

3/7/6

0.14

 CFH I62V (AA/AG/GG)

4/20/17b

2/10/4

0.42

  1. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations where applicable
  2. PVD, posterior vitreous detachment; tAMD, typical age-related macular degeneration; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; logMAR BCVA, logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity; ARMS2, age-related maculopathy susceptibility protein 2; and CFH, complement factor H
  3. In ARMS2 A69S, GG, GT, and TT represent non-risk-homo, hetero, and risk-homo, respectively
  4. In CFH I62V, AA, AG, and GG represent non-risk-homo, hetero, and risk-homo, respectively
  5. In measurements indicated by a and b data are missing for two and two patients, respectively
  6. Chi-square test
  7. Chi-square trend test; the remaining: t-test
  8. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05)