Skip to main content

Table 6 Visual acuity in eyes with epiretinal membrane that were observed vs underwent epiretinal membrane peeling

From: Risk factors for epiretinal membrane formation and peeling following pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, an OCT guided analysis

 

ERM stage

VA at diagnosis of ERM (LogMAR, Snellen)

SD

VA at last followup (LogMAR, Snellen)

SD

Time to last followup (months)

SD

ERM without peeling

1

0.24 (= 20/34)

0.34

0.19 (= 20/31)

0.36

27.6

16.5

2

0.20 (= 20/32)

0.21

0.07 (= 20/24)

0.11

31.0

22.1

3

0.18 (= 20/30)

0.18 (= 20/30)

18.8

4

All

0.23 (= 20/34)*+

0.33

0.18 (= 20/30)+

0.34

27.9

17.1

ERM with peeling

1

0.48 (= 20/60)

0.00

0.54 (= 20/70)

0.09

42.0

8.5

2

0.60 (= 20/80)

0.60 (= 20/80)

-

12.0

3

1.37 (= 20/400)

0.70

0.24 (= 20/34)

0.09

36.0

17.0

4

0.60 (= 20/80)

0.18 (= 20/30)

36.0

All

0.82 (= 20/132)*

0.53

0.39 (= 20/50)

0.20

18.0

18.3

  1. VA visual acuity, ERM epiretinal membrane, SD standard deviation
  2. *p < 0.05 Visual acuity was significantly worse at diagnosis of ERM in eyes that later underwent ERM peeling compared to eyes that were observed
  3. +p < 0.05 There was a significant improvement in visual acuity in eyes with ERM that were observed without peeling