Skip to main content

Table 8 Patient value conferred by drug classes across medicine [16, 37]

From: The comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab for neovascular macular degeneration revisited

Drug class

Indication

# of drugs

Patient value gain (%)

Histamine H-1 receptor antagonists, oral

Seasonal allergy

10

4–7

Histamine H-1 receptor antagonists, topical ocular

Allergy, ocular

6

0.1–9.9

SSRI drugs

Depression, major

5

20–23

Anti-depressants, non-SSRI

Depression, major

6

21–32

cGMP-specific phosphodi-esterase inhibitors

Erectile dysfunction

3

2.7–2.9

Proton pump inhibitors

Acute erosive esophagitis

5

13–26

Proton pump inhibitors

Gastroesophageal reflux

5

8–14

Proton pump inhibitors

Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome

5

29–38

Histamine H-2 receptor antagonists

Acute erosive esophagitis

4

5–11

Histamine H-2 receptor antagonists

Gastroesophageal reflux

4

3–7

B-blockers, topical

Glaucoma

3

16–19

Statins

Hyperlipidemia

6

3–5

Diuretics

Hypertension, systemic arterial

5

7.7–9.4

ACE inhibitors

Hypertension, systemic arterial

9

6.5–9.1

B-blockers, oral

Hypertension, systemic arterial

7

6.3–9.1

Hypnotics

Insomnia

7

1.2–8.8

Ranibizumab, combined eye model

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration, current study

1

16.3

Bisphosphonates

Osteoporosis

3

0.8–1.1

α1-adrenergic blockers

Prostatic hyperplasia

3

0.6–1.4

  1. All values are from the Center for Value-Based Medicine Pharmaceutical Value Index database©
  2. SSRI selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, statins HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors