Table 3 Summary of bibliography
Author | No. patients with VRL | No. eyes with VRL | No. eyes with macular oedema (%) | Total no. of eyes with prior treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cassoux et al. [12] | 44 | 81 | 2 (2.46%) | 3 had PPV |
Velez et al. [13] | 17 | 31 | 6 (19%) | 4 had cataract surgery 1 had PPV |
Fardeau et al. [14] | 53 | ? | 6 patients (11.3%) | ? |
Turaka et al. [15] | 8 | 10 with FFA 3 with OCT | 6 (60%) 2 (66.6%) | 50% CT 25% RT 25% CT + RT |
Jang et al. [23] | 5 | 5 | 2 (40%) | 1 eye was a secondary VRL, so we assume that had previous CT and/or RT |
Saito et al. [24] | 20 | 26 | 3 (11.53%) | 2 eyes had ERM |
Our series | 9 | 15 | 6 (40%) | 5 eyes had CT + RT 4 eyes had intraocular surgery |