Table 3 Mean changes in NLR vs. T1 by group
From: Evaluation of visual acuity in dry AMD patients after microcurrent electrical stimulation
Time points | Treatment group contrast (95% CI)a | Sham control group contrast (95% CI)a | Treatment-Sham control contrast (95% CI)a | Treatment-Sham control P-value (H0: difference = 0)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
T2-T1 | 4.4 (3.7, 5.1) | − 0.5 (− 1.5, 0.6) | 4.9 (3.6, 6.2) | < 0.001 |
T3-T1 | 6.7 (5.8, 7.5) | − 0.2 (− 1.4, 1.1) | 6.8 (5.3, 8.4) | < 0.001 |
T4-T1 | 7.7 (6.7, 8.8) | − 0.2 (− 1.8, 1.3) | 8.0 (6.1, 9.8) | < 0.001 |
E1-T1 | 7.6 (6.5, 8.7) | − 0.1 (− 1.8, 1.6) | 7.7 (5.7, 9.7) | < 0.001 |
T5-T1 | 6.5 (5.4, 7.6) | − 1.0 (− 2.7, 0.6) | 7.5 (5.6, 9.5) | < 0.001 |
E2-T1 | 7.2 (6.0, 8.4) | − 1.2 (− 3.0, 0.6) | 8.4 (6.3, 10.5) | < 0.001 |
T6-T1 | 6.3 (5.1, 7.6) | − 2.0 (− 4.0, − 0.1) | 8.4 (6.1, 10.7) | < 0.001 |
E3-T1 | 8.2 (6.7, 9.7) | − 2.2 (− 4.4, 0.0) | 10.4 (7.8, 13.1) | < 0.001 |