Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic data

From: Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes

Characteristics

Group P

conventional ILM peeling

(n = 52)

Group F

ILM flap

technique

(n = 65)

p-value

Age ± SD (years), range

68.5 ± 8.2

42–84

69.5 ± 7,7

53–89

*0.892

Male, n (%)

14 (26.9)

17 (26)

-

Right eye, n (%)

26 (50)

37(57)

-

MH-BD, mean ± SD (µm), range

741 ± 207

401–1135

729 ± 212

402–1353

*0.079

MH-MLD, mean ± SD (µm), range

333 ± 114

109–594

373 ± 132

82–740

*0.084

BCVA, mean ± SD (logMAR), range

Lens status (phakic, n (%)

0.79 ± 0.25

0.3–1.3

45 (86.5)

0.88 ± 0.31

0.3–1.6

54 (83.1)

**0.180

-

Axial length, mean ± SD (mm)

23.4 (± 0.8)

23.2 (± 1.0)

*0.638

  1. Mean age (at time of surgery in years); range (minimum to maximum); ± standard deviation (SD), MH-BD: macular hole base diameter, MH-MLD: macular hole minimum linear diameter, BCVA: best corrected visual acuity, Shapiro-Wilk test (distribution of variables), *t-test, ** Mann-Whitney U test