Skip to main content

Table 3 Ocular findings regarding macular hole size and anatomical outcome

From: Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes

Characteristics

Group P conventional ILM peeling (n = 52)

Group F ILM flap technique (n = 65)

MH-MLD (µm)

≤ 400

n = 40

> 400

n = 12

≤ 400

n = 39

> 400

n = 26

Baseline BCVA, mean ± SD (logMAR), range

0.72 ± 0.21

0.3–1.0

1.02 ± 0.23

0.52–1.3

0.8 ± 0.28

0.3–1.3

0.98 ± 0.32

0.4–1.6

Baseline MH-MLD, mean ± SD (µm), range

*thereof, closed after first surgery

289 ± 71

109–395

259 ± 63

109–365

598 ± 62

405–594

523 ± 100

452–594

288 ± 80

82–392

285 ± 80

82–392

500 ± 84.4

418–740

490 ± 82

418–740

Macular hole status

closed/not closed, n (%)

29/11

(72.5:27.5)

2/12

(16.6:83.4)

35/39 (89.7:10.3)

23/26

(88.4:11.6)

BCVA 1st follow-up, mean ± SD (logMAR), range

* thereof, closed after first surgery

0.53 ± 0.32

0–1.0

0.40 ± 0.25

0–1.0

0.96 ± 0.37

0.4–1.56

0.43 ± 0.04

0.4–0.46

0.46 ± 0.29

0.04–1.14

0.42 ± 0.27

0.04–1.14

0.57 ± 0.37

0.06–1.4

0.52 ± 0.35

0.06–1.3

BCVA 2nd follow-up, mean ± SD (logMAR), range

* thereof, closed after first surgery

0.52 ± 0.36

0–1.3

0.40 ± 0.27

0–1.0

0.89 ± 0.39

0.22–1.5

0.26 ± 0.05

0.22–0.3

0.40 ± 0.34

0.0–1.3

0.39 ± 0.34

0–1.3

0.53 ± 0.39

0–1.3

0.49 ± 0.36

0–1.3

  1. Range (minimum to maximum), ± standard deviation (SD), BCVA: best corrected visual acuity, MH-MLD: macular hole minimum linear diameter