Real-world experience of full-thickness traumatic macular hole among young patients

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with hole closure

Variables	Risk Factors	Co-Efficient	Crude Odds Ratio	95% of Confidence Interval	P value
Variables	Risk Factors	Co-Efficient	Crude Odds Ratio	Lower Limit - Upper Limit	P value
Gender	Male	1.20	3.33	0.37–25.98	0.25
Age	21–30 Yrs	-0.81	0.44	0.08–2.71	0.36
Age	31–40 Yrs	1.20	3.33	0.47–67.68	0.30
Mode of injury	Ball	0.67	1.64	0.21–34.01	0.67
	Fire Crackers	-1.50	0.22	0.01–6.15	0.31
	Stick	-1.65	0.19	0.02–1.90	0.14
	Blunt Trauma	0.88	2.40	0.33–49.13	0.45
Co-morbidities	ERM	0.49	1.64	0.21–49.13	0.45
	IRF	1.50	4.50	0.81–35.68	0.10
	SRF	0.58	1.78	0.33–10.50	0.50
	SRH	-1.50	0.22	0.01–6.15	0.31

ERM– epiretinal membrane; IRF– intraretinal fluid; SRF– subretinal fluid; SRH– subretinal hemorrhage

ISSN: 2056-9920