- Original article
- Open Access
Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks postoperative prone positioning results: 1 day versus 7 days
© The Author(s) 2017
- Received: 20 August 2017
- Accepted: 15 October 2017
- Published: 4 December 2017
To compare the primary anatomical outcome of pars plana vitrectomy, 360° peripheral endolaser, and 15% octafluoropropane C3F8 gas tamponade in patients with uncomplicated rhegmatogenous detachment and inferior retinal breaks, after 24-h postoperative prone positioning to similar patients with 1 week postoperative prone positioning.
Records of 5500 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy between 2008 and 2015 were retrieved. Collected data included age, gender, number of retinal quadrants with retinal breaks, number of retinal breaks, macula status on presentation (attached or detached), phakic status (phakic, pseudophakic, or aphakic), and primary anatomical outcome (at 1 and 3 months post-operative).
270 patients met the study inclusion criteria (78 females, and 192 males). In the 24-h positioning arm (183 patients), the overall anatomical success rate was 96.2% at 1 month and 83.6% at 3 months. In the 1-week positioning group (87 patients), the overall anatomical success rate was 93% at 1 month and 79% at 3 months. Both positioning groups did not show statistical difference in outcome at 1 month (p-value = 0.7) or at 3 months (p-value = 0.39). Logistic regression analysis found that the number of retinal breaks correlates with the postoperative anatomical success at 3 months (odd ratio 0.8, p-value = 0.016).
This short term retrospective study demonstrated that patients with uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to inferior retinal breaks, who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, 360° endolaser, 15% C3F8 gas, and limited (24-h) prone positioning did not show statistical difference in the anatomical outcome (at 1, and 3 months) when compared with 1 week postoperative positioning. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate positioning role.
- Inferior retinal detachment
- Head positioning
- Inferior retinal break
Retinal detachment is a vision threatening disease that has been reported to range between five and 12 cases per 100,000 population per year [1–3], with a lifetime risk of 0.6% (up to 60 years of age) [4, 5]. Although 6% of the general population are thought to have retinal breaks, most of these are asymptomatic benign atrophic holes, which are without accompanying pathology, and do not lead to retinal detachment .
In the past, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was used as the primary surgical intervention for only complicated retinal detachments. Nonetheless, favorable reattachment rates with low intraoperative complication rates have made PPV an increasingly popular primary option for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair . Technological advancements allow the surgeon to visualize all retinal breaks, as well as the removal of opacities. On the other hand, Afrashi et al.  reported iatrogenic retinal breaks in more than 7% of patients, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in more than 9% after PPV.
Inferior breaks have also been reported to be associated with surgical failure following PPV for RRD repair [8–10]. The scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR group) showed that inferior detachment with breaks below the 4 and 8 o’clock positions was a significant risk factor in pseudophakic/aphakic subtrial .
There is little agreement on the optimal postoperative head positioning duration in patients with RRD due to inferior retinal break after PPV and intraocular long-acting gas infusion. Some surgeons prone position these patients for 1 day, while others recommend positioning for 7, or 14 days.
To compare 24-h and 1 week postoperative prone positioning anatomical outcome after PPV, 360° peripheral endolaser, and 15% C3F8 gas tamponade in patients with uncomplicated RRD and inferior retinal breaks.
This is a retrospective cohort study, with two main comparative arms based on postoperative prone head positioning duration (1 day vs. 7 days). Postoperative positioning duration was assigned based on surgeons’ practice pattern, 1 surgeon only recommends positioning for 1 day, while the other 3 surgeons recommend positioning for 7 days for retinal detachment with inferior breaks. Primary outcome for this study is anatomical outcome at 1 month postoperative visit, while the secondary outcome is anatomical outcome at 3 months postoperative visit.
Data collection included: age, gender, location of retinal breaks, number of retinal breaks, macula attachment status on presentation, intraocular lens status (phakic, pseudophakic, aphakic), anatomical outcome (at 1 month, and 3 months), and postoperative prone head positioning duration (1 day vs. 7 days). Ethics approval was granted by the ethics review board at HMR for research and publication, no consent form was needed. None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata Statistics/Data Analysis software v.14. All results generated from this study are included in this published article (study data can be accessed on obtaining the host institute ethics board approval).
Demographic distribution of study population
1 day positioning group (N* = 183)
7 days positioning group (N* = 87)
66 ± 13 years
65 ± 13 years
Gender, females (N*, %)
Lens status, phakic (N*, %)
Number of retinal breaks (mean ± SD*)
1.9 ± 0.8
2.6 ± 1.7
Number of quadrants detached (mean ± SD*)
1.9 ± 0.8
2.1 ± 0.9
Macula attached on presentation (N*, %)
One day positioning group results
Seven days positioning group results
In the 1 week positioning group (87 patients), the overall primary anatomical success rate was 93% at 1 month, and 79% at 3 months. Primary anatomical success in phakic subgroup (21 eyes) was 95% at 1 month, and 76% at 3 months post-operative. In the pseudophakic/aphakic subgroup (66 eyes), primary anatomical success was 92.4%, and 80% at 1 month, and at 3 months post-operative visits respectively (Fig. 3).
Logistic regression analysis, when controlling for gender, macula attachment, lens status, number of quadrant detached, and postoperative positioning group, the number of retinal breaks is found to statistically correlate with the postoperative anatomical success at 3 months (odds ratio 0.78, p value = 0.017)
Three months outcome
Number of breaks
Number of quadrant detached
Macula status on presentation
Recent advances in the development and use of intravitreally injected substitutes has played an important role in facilitating retinal reattachment surgery . Intraocular gases help prevent intravitreal fluid escape through retinal breaks to the subretinal space by closure of retinal breaks using high surface tension interface, mechanical buoyance keeping retina attached, and decrease intraocular fluid current over retinal breaks. Nevertheless, when causative breaks are located inferiorly, the facedown position, and long-acting gas have been recommended [12–16]. However, patients who receive gas tamponade must be monitored closely as gases have been associated with natural lens opacification and high intraocular pressure.
Maintenance of the position after surgery when a gas tamponade is used is considered essential for achieving success in retinal detachment (RD) surgery. Nonetheless, some patients are unable to position themselves appropriately after surgery owing to medical, physical, or social conditions. To avoid this problem, different authors have used a buckle combined with PPV for the management of these breaks [17–19]. However, a recent multicenter study in Europe included over 7000 patients, found that when a PPV is done in uncomplicated RD, a supplemental buckle was not found to be beneficial . Others have used silicone oil as a tamponade . Some reports proposed the use of air alone as a tamponade for the management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic RD without facedown positioning in 40 patients with primary success rate of 90% , or only air with 24-h prone position in a different series of 15 patients with primary success rate of 93.3% . A recent series included 147 patients proposed the use of vitrectomy only to treat retinal detachment secondary to inferior retinal breaks, including fluid–air exchange, treating only retinal breaks with transscleral laser or endolaser, and no face-down positioning, initial reattachment rate was reported to be 94.5% .
Since PPV primary success rate is reported to be less than 90% in several major epidemiological studies [20, 25, 26], the decision of including a control group arm that has all reported success factors (including PPV, no PVR, C3F8 gas, prophylactic 360° laser) was stressed in an attempt to have only one variable between groups, which was the duration of postoperative head positioning. The 1 month end point was designed to assess anatomical outcome while the C3F8 gas bubble is still in the eye, has decreased by approximately 50%, no longer covering the inferior breaks, and after laser treated areas have formed scarred adhesion. The second end point of 3 months was chosen to allow intraocular C3F8 gas to completely resorb , as a result, there would be no gas bubble to conceal untreated superior pathology (e.g. superior retinal break, or PVR).
Argon laser photocoagulation is found to enhance retina adhesiveness within 24 h to 128% of normal levels in rabbit eyes, while cryoretinopexy reduced the retinal adhesiveness during the first week, but afterwards generated as much adhesiveness as photocoagulation. Beyond 6 months, the adhesive force for cryoretinopexy was (214%), and for laser photocoagulation was (220%) .
Yoon et al. examined how quickly laser photocoagulation produces a bond between retina and pigment epithelium. After photocoagulation of intact retina, the adhesive force was reduced 50% at 8 h but increased beyond normal (to approximately 140%) by 24 h and remained twice normal between 3 days and 3 weeks. Photocoagulation of retina that had just settled after experimental detachment produced similar results, except that the maximum strength of adhesion (reached at 2 weeks) was three times normal. In contrast, retina that reattached spontaneously, without photocoagulation, showed only 10% of normal adhesiveness at 24 h, and still was only 75% of normal after 4 weeks. These data suggest that laser photocoagulation may be acutely beneficial in the prevention or management of retinal tears and detachments . which served as part of the rational for the 1 day positioning duration by one surgeon. On the other hand, excessive laser treatment can lead to progressive localized retinal atrophy and development of future retinal breaks at the margin of the laser scar.
Conversely, the application of prophylactic 360 laser retinopexy may be an effective method of reducing the incidence of retinal redetachment in the same eye. Laidlaw et al.  found a significant reduction in the incidence of retinal redetachment after the removal of silicone oil tamponade in patients undergoing laser retinopexy. Intraoperative 360° laser retinopexy following phaco-vitrectomy resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of postoperative retinal detachment in macular hole cases, or in epiretinal membrane peel surgeries combined with phacoemulsification [31, 32]. That was the rational for including 360° laser retinopexy in the inclusion criteria, and the reason it was conducted by participating surgeons retrospectively.
On the other hand, it has been proven that subbasal corneal nerve plexus density decreases after 360° laser retinopexy, and is accompanied by epithelium thinning and decreased corneal sensation. As a result, it is recommended that heavy confluent retinal laser treatment should be avoided when possible, and corneal sensitivity be assessed postoperatively to determine whether significant anesthesia has occurred. In such instances, prophylactic measures may be warranted against the development of neurotrophic ulcers .
This study is a retrospective study, which creates a challenge in having balanced groups. To avoid any selection bias, all patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included, that resulted in the number of included patients to be more in the 1 day positioning group compared to the 7 days positioning group (183, and 87 patients respectively). However, on sample demographic analysis no statistical difference was detected comparing age, gender, lens status, or macular attachment on presentation. There was a statistical difference in the number of retinal breaks (1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.6 ± 1.7, p value = 0.002), and a marginal difference in number of quadrants detached (1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.1 ± 0.9, p value = 0.037) between groups (1 day, and 7 days positioning groups respectively).
This short term retrospective study demonstrated that patients with uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to inferior retinal breaks, who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, 360° endolaser, 15% C3F8 gas, and limited (24-h) prone positioning did not show statistical difference in the anatomical outcome (at 1, and 3 months) when compared with 1 week postoperative positioning. Larger prospective studies are still warranted to further elucidate postoperative positioning role in similar cohort of patients.
RA, study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript drafting. JI, data collection, manuscript drafting. GC, RD, SO, FR: study design, data collection, manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Previous study presentations: ASRS 2016 meeting.
None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Data and material are available after obtaining additional institutional ethics review board approval.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was granted by the ethics review board at HMR for research and publication, no consent to participate was required.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Suckling RD, Hay JR. A regional survey of retinal detachment in New Zealand. Trans Ophthalmol Soc N Z. 1968;20:69–74.Google Scholar
- Polkinghorne PJ, Craig JP. Northern New Zealand rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study: epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:159–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hadden B. Pioneering surgery for retinal detachment in Australasia: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(7):618–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK. Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:289–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkes SR, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Robertson DM, O’Fallon WM. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970–1978. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:670–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sodhi A, Leung LS, Do DV, Gower EW, Schein OD, Handa JT. Recent trends in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53(1):50–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Afrashi F, Erakgun T, Akkin C, Kaskaloglu M, Mentes J. Conventional buckling surgery or primary vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with multiple breaks. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:295–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeck C, et al. Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:69–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV, et al. Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83:293–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Castillo V, Verdugo A, Boixadera A, García-Arumí J, Corcóstegui B. Management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and air. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1078–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1129–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Escoffery RF, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Boniuk I. Vitrectomy without scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:275–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Effenterre G, Haut J, Larricart P, Abi-Rached J, Vachet JM. Gas tamponade as a single technique in the treatment of retinal detachment: is vitrectomy needed? A comparative study of 120 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225:254–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JT. Kinetics of intraocular gases. Disappearance of air, sulfur hexafluoride, and perfluoropropane after pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:687–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fawcett IM, Williams RL, Wong D. Contact angles of substances used for internal tamponade in retinal detachment surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:438–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams R, Wong D. The influence of explants on the physical efficiency of tamponade agents. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:870–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gartry DS, Chignell AH, Franks WA, Wong D. Pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment uncomplicated by advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:199–203.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs W, et al. Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234:561–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desai UR, Strassman IB. Combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling for pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments in which a break is not seen preoperatively. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997;28:718–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society (EVRS) Retinal Detachment Study Group. Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1804–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolf S, Schön V, Meier P, Wiedemann P. Silicone oil-RMN3 mixture (“heavy silicone oil”) as internal tamponade for complicated retinal detachment. Retina. 2003;23:335–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Verdugo A, García-Arumí J. Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic retinal detachment without facedown position. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(7):1222–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez-Castillo V, Verdugo A, Boixadera A, García-Arumí J, Corcóstegui B. Management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and air. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(8):1078–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez-Castillo VJ, García-Arumí J, Boixadera A. Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with only inferior breaks. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(7):1563–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sallam A, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 3, retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(3):643–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ, Lin HC. Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9-year nationwide population-based study. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(3):669–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs PM, Twomey JM, Leaver PK. Behaviour of intraocular gases. Eye. 1988;2:660–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kita M, Negi A, Kawano S, Honda Y. Photothermal, cryogenic, and diathermic effects of retinal adhesive force in vivo. Retina. 1991;11(4):441–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon YH, Marmor MF. Rapid enhancement of retinal adhesion by laser photocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(10):1385–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laidlaw DA, Karia N, Bunce C, Aylward GW, Gregor ZJ. Is prophylactic 360- degree laser retinopexy protective? Risk factors for retinal redetachment after removal of silicone oil. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:153–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iwase T, Jo YJ, Oveson BC. Effect of prophylactic 360° laser treatment for prevention of retinal detachment after phacovitrectomy: prophylactic 360° laser treatment for prevention of retinal detachment. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013;10(13):77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang HS, Kim YJ, Kim JG. New prophylactic intraoperative septated circumferential barrier laser in macular surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51(2):102–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouheraoua Nacim, Hrarat Linda, Parsa Cameron F, et al. Decreased corneal sensation and subbasal nerve density, and thinned corneal epithelium as a result of 360-degree laser retinopexy. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(10):2095–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar