Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Retinal malperfusion in albuminuric Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy: a prospective pilot study

  • Fernando Korn Malerbi1, 2Email author,
  • Caio Vinicius Regatieri1,
  • João Roberto de Sa2,
  • Paulo Henrique Morales1,
  • Michel Eid Farah1 and
  • Sergio Atala Dib2
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous20173:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0102-y

Received: 20 September 2017

Accepted: 6 November 2017

Published: 18 December 2017

Abstract

Background

To report fluorescein angiography findings in a group of albuminuric Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients without diabetic retinopathy.

Methods

Fifteen albuminuric T1DM patients with normal/near normal estimated glomerular filtration rate without diabetic retinopathy underwent fluorescein angiography; presence of microaneurysms, vascular permeability changes and retinal malperfusion were evaluated.

Results

Fluorescein angiography revealed microaneurysms, blood-retinal barrier breakdown and retinal ischemia in 10 (67%) and 11 (73%); 8 (53%) and 9 (60%); 2 (13%) and 5 (33%) of patients at baseline and follow up, respectively. Follow up time averaged 24.6 months, minimum follow up time was 20 months. Patients who presented retinal malperfusion had higher HbA1C and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Conclusions

Most albuminuric T1DM patients with a normal fundus exam had angiographic signs of diabetic retinopathy, some presenting retinal malperfusion. Retinal changes may be found with more sensitive testing in these patients, especially with impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate, even if the fundus exam is normal, and fluorescein angiography should be considered. These findings point to a homogenous presentation of the diabetic microangiopathies.

Keywords

Type 1 diabetes mellitusDiabetic retinopathyFluorescein angiographyNephropathyAlbuminuriaEstimated glomerular filtration rate

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of visual impairment in developed countries [1]; visual acuity usually declines because of macular edema or retinal ischemia [2]. DR and diabetic nephropathy are microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) which share some similar risk factors and pathophysiology pathways, such as increased vascular permeability. These chronic diabetes complications may not arise simultaneously in Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) patients [3], but this heterogeneity might be due to inaccurate diagnosis [4].

It is a general consensus that DR should be annually screened if the fundus is normal [5, 6]. Retinal fluorescein angiography (FA), an exam that evaluates retinal perfusion, may detect preclinical diabetic retinopathy [7], such as retinal vessel permeability changes, microvascular leakage and blood-retina barrier breakdown. FA is not routinely performed in patients with a normal fundus exam.

Albuminuria is considered an important early marker of diabetic nephropathy and endothelial dysfunction [8], along with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Patients already with diabetic nephropathy may be at a higher risk of developing other microvascular complications, such as retinopathy [5]. However, there are causes other than diabetes for renal impairment in diabetes patients, and these other renal diseases are present in approximately 30% of diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria without diabetic retinopathy; the absence of retinopathy is considered an indication for renal biopsy in albuminuric patients [9].

In order to evaluate retinal permeability and/or perfusion changes in albuminuric T1DM patients without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy, we performed a clinical and angiographic follow up of such patients for a period of 2 years.

Patients and methods

Inclusion criteria were T1DM, diagnosed in accordance with the American Diabetes Association criteria [10]; spot urinary albumin excretion rate between 30 and 300 mg/g creatinine, detected in at least two out of three samples [8], or use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker secondary to previous diagnosis of albuminuria; and absence of clinical diabetic retinopathy. All patients were being followed in a University Diabetes Center. Exclusion criteria were spherical equivalent > ± 3 diopters, other ocular comorbidities that could interfere with the normal retinal aspect, such as vascular occlusions, inherited retinal diseases, as well as uveitis and media opacities that precluded retinal evaluation such as cataracts. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the local ethics committee approved the study protocol.

Clinical and laboratorial parameters such as age, gender, diabetes duration, arterial hypertension, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), lipid disorders and HbA1c values were obtained from the Diabetes Center clinical files.

HbA1c was measured by HPLC (TOSOH G7, Luxembourg, Belgium; nv: 4.0–5.6%). HbA1c values correspond to the arithmetic mean of available HbA1c measurements in the 2 years preceding the study visit. Urinary albumin from spot urine collections was determined using an immunoturbidimetric assay (nv: < 30 mg/g creatinine); eGFR was calculated with Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations (nv > 90 ml/min/1.73 m2) [11].

In order to evaluate the presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy, all included patients underwent clinical ophthalmological evaluation, which consisted of mydriatic binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) with a 20 diopter condensing lens and slit lamp fundus biomicroscopy with a 78 diopter condensing lens. Retinal evaluation was performed by an experienced retinal specialist. All included patients had a normal fundus at baseline. After inclusion in the study, FA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed.

Fluorescein angiogram (FA)

FA was obtained after 2 ml intravenous injection of 25% fluorescein sodium. Retinal images were obtained with Heidelberg HRA2 (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). Image analysis was performed with HRA software. FA analysis was also evaluated blindly by two independent experienced readers (FKM and CVR) and the following parameters were noted: retinal ischemia/malperfusion, microaneurysms, vascular changes (telangiectasis, vessel wall staining, vascular hyperpermeability), angiographic macular edema, retinal neovascularization, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA). Blood-retinal barrier breakdown was defined as increased retinal fluorescein leakage associated with vascular changes [1], and retinal malperfusion was defined as the presence of avascular areas which could be detected because of the sharp contrast to the adjacent clearly visible capillary net [12]. Analyses were performed in both eyes of each subject, and the posterior pole was evaluated as well as retinal periphery. Early/midphase angiograms allowed evaluation of the foveal avascular zone, capillary loss and vascular changes, while late phase angiograms allowed evaluation of fluorescein leakage and cystoid changes [12].

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)

SD-OCT scans were obtained with spectral-domain Cirrus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and analysis was based on the automated central retinal thickness (CRT) protocol. Central retinal thickness was automatically measured in the Macular Cube protocol.

All patients were followed for a minimum of 20 months. According to the current guidelines [10], if the fundus was normal, they were asked to be seen again in 1 year, in an interim evaluation which consisted of BIO and slit lamp fundus biomicroscopy. At the 2 year visit, FA and OCT were repeated.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Analyses consisted of descriptive statistics and two-tailed Student’s T test for independent samples, performed after Levene’s test for equality of variances. A 95% confidence interval and a 5% level of significance were adopted. The following variables and outcomes from baseline and follow up were compared, respectively: HbA1C and eGFR; any FA changes or retinal malperfusion. All statistics were calculated using SPSS for Windows version 19.0 (Armonk, NY).

Results

Baseline evaluation

Clinical and laboratory data of the fifteen patients followed in this study are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. Gender was feminine in 10 patients (67%). Two patients (13%) had systemic arterial hypertension and they were under control. Five patients (33%) were under treatment for lipid disorders with statins.

At FA baseline analysis, ten patients (67%) had microaneurysms, blood-retinal barrier breakdown was evident in 8 (53%), and 2 (patients 6 and 13—Additional file 1: Table S1) (13%) showed signs of retinal malperfusion (Fig. 1); patients who presented retinal malperfusion had higher HbA1C levels than patients who did not present retinal malperfusion (13.2 ± 2.2 vs 9.3 ± 1.3%, p = 0.003). Agreement for FA analysis was complete between the two expert examiners.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Fundus images and fluorescein angiogram of a microalbuminuric Type 1 DM patient. a, b Fundus photoghraphs depicting normal fundus (a right eye; b left eye). c, d Fluorescein angiogram frames of the same patient, depicting retinal ischemia (c right eye) and breakdown of blood-retinal barrier (d left eye)

SD-OCT scans were analyzed qualitatively for retinal architecture and quantitatively for retinal thickness. All eyes showed a normal anatomic pattern at SD-OCT analysis; no patient showed tomographic signs of macular edema. CRT was normal in all eyes (240 ± 18 μm).

Interim evaluation

All patients presented with normal fundus except patient 6 (Additional file 1: Table S1) who developed retinal neovascularization and underwent laser pan retinal photocoagulation. This patient had baseline and follow up HbA1C values of 14.7 and 12.9%, respectively, and she was one of the two patients that had retinal malperfusion at the baseline evaluation.

Follow up

Average follow up time was 24.6 months (range 20–32 months).

Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Graphic S1 show the evolution of clinical, laboratorial and FA parameters. CRT remained normal in all eyes (238 ± 22 μm).

One-third of the patients developed clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy at the end of follow up: 3 patients with mild nonproliferative DR, 1 moderate nonproliferative DR and 1 proliferative DR. Five patients who had FA abnormalities at baseline still had no clinically visible signs of DR at follow up.

Three patients showed stable FA findings, whereas 12 patients (80%) showed worsening of FA parameters; 3 of those patients did not have FA changes at baseline evaluation. A lower baseline eGFR was present in those patients who had FA changes as compared to patients who did not present FA changes at follow up (114 ± 25 vs 168 ± 55 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.030). At follow up, five (33%) patients had retinal malperfusion, and they had higher baseline HbA1C levels (11.3 ± 2.1 vs 9.1 ± 1.3%, p = 0.024) and lower eGFR at follow up (88 ± 19 vs 115 ± 20 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.026). All other comparisons failed to reach significance.

Eleven (73%) patients had microaneurysms at FA analysis, blood-retinal barrier breakdown was evident in 9 (60%), and 5 (33%) showed signs of retinal malperfusion or retinal neovascularization. Among the 5 patients who presented retinal malperfusion or retinal neovascularization at the follow up, two had already presented FA signs of retinal malperfusion at baseline (patients 6 and 13, Additional file 1: Table S1). Retinal malperfusion was detected on 3 patients who did not have FA signs of malperfusion at baseline (patients 5, 7 and 14, Additional file 1: Table S1). Two patients (patients 1 and 5, Additional file 1: Table S1) became pregnant during follow up period; one of them (patient 1) had a good metabolic control (HbA1C varied from 7.7 to 6.3%) and showed stable retinopathy (microaneurysms only), whereas the other (patient 5) had worsened metabolic control (HbA1C varied from 9.0 to 9.3%) and developed retinal malperfusion (Fig. 2).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Baseline and follow up fundus and fluorescein angiogram of a microalbuminuric Type 1 DM patient. a, b Baseline color fundus photoghraphs depicting normal fundus (a right eye; b left eye). c, d Baseline fluorescein angiograms depicting leakage and macular cystoid changes. e Follow up fundus image of right eye depicting a single microaneurysm. fh Follow up fluorescein angiograms of right eye depicting leakage, vessel wall staining, cystoid changes and peripheral retinal malperfusion. i Follow up fundus image of left eye depicting a normal fundus. jl Follow up fluorescein angiograms of left eye depicting leakage, vessel wall staining, cystoid changes and peripheral retinal malperfusion

In relation to other systemic alterations, two patients (patients 1 and 15, Additional file 1: Table S1) with systemic arterial hypertension were in the normal perfusion group; two other patients (patients 6, 14, Additional file 1: Table S1) under treatment for lipid disorders were in the malperfusion group and other three patients (patients 3, 8, 9, Additional file 1: Table S1) were in the normal perfusion group.

All eyes showed a normal anatomic pattern at SD-OCT analysis; no patient showed tomographic signs of macular edema. CRT was normal in all eyes (238 ± 23 μm).

Discussion

In this pilot study, FA analysis detected that 67% of albuminuric T1DM patients without clinical signs of DR had at least one eye with angiographic signs of DR at baseline evaluation, and 13% of the patients had angiographic signs of retinal malperfusion. CRT was normal in all evaluated eyes.

After 2 years of follow-up, despite having been followed in a tertiary diabetes center, most patients had poor glycemic control (HbA1C ~ 9%), in accordance with published data regarding this age group [13]; 80% of these patients showed signs of clinical or angiographic DR worsening, and 33% of the patients had developed retinal malperfusion and/or retinal neovascularization. Patients who presented FA changes at follow up had a lower baseline eGFR.

Patients who presented retinal malperfusion at baseline and follow up had higher baseline HbA1C levels; patients who presented retinal malperfusion at follow up also had a lower eGFR at follow up.

The apparent dissociation between diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy has been described previously [3, 5]; however, with FA, which yields a more sensitive DR diagnostic testing than the clinical exam [1], the disparity between DR and nephropathy was reduced, as 86% of the patients in this study had FA signs of retinal disease at the end of follow up.

It is known that inflammation, endothelial damage and impaired regulation of extracellular matrix remodelling by matrix methaloproteinases are the background to both albuminuria and diabetic retinopathy [14, 15]; the latter and diabetic nephropathy also share similar risk factors and pathophysiology pathways. The results of the present study confirm these data and suggest that retinopathy should be actively sought once albuminuria and/or decreased eGFR are detected.

FA is a sensible method to diagnose preclinical diabetic retinopathy [1, 16] and it may detect increased retinal vascular permeability in pre-diabetic subjects, as well as in DM patients without clinical signs DR [1, 4, 17]. Our study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first one to detect FA signs of retinal malperfusion in T1DM patients without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy. Retinal malperfusion may lead to severe and sometimes irreversible complications such as macular ischemia and retinal neovascularization [2].

It is well established that poor glycemic control is associated with the development of retinopathy and nephropathy in T1DM [18, 19]. Even though the belief that albuminuria precedes GFR loss has been recently challenged, both albuminuria and reduced GFR are considered hallmarks of renal damage in individuals with diabetes; they may be independent markers of chronic renal disease progression [20]. The present study contributes with the understanding that albuminuria plays a role as a marker of diabetic microvascular disease, since our albuminuric patients had also sub-clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy. This finding carries clinical importance: when one of the diabetic microvascular complications is present, the clinician should be careful regarding the appearance of the microvascular complications in other target organs. This search for complications should be emphasized, if possible with more sensitive tests, as was the case with fluorescein angiography.

This pilot study has some limitations. First, RD screening was not performed according to the gold-standard ETDRS protocol [21]. However, retinal examination with indirect ophthalmoscopy plus slit lamp fundus biomicroscopy is an accepted method for the screening of diabetic retinopathy [22] and represents the routine ophthalmic evaluation of diabetic patients in our country [2326]. Second, control groups of normal individuals and normoalbuminuric T1DM patients for the comparison of FA findings were lacking. However, FA carries the potentially serious risk of anaphylaxis; furthermore, FA has already been extensively studied in normal and pre-diabetes individuals, as well as in DM patients without DR [1, 4, 17, 27, 28], all of whom have presented only hyperpermeability changes, in opposition to our findings of retinal malperfusion. Third, our series comprised a reduced number of patients. Nevertheless, even with a reduced sample, we found angiographic signs of retinal malperfusion in patients who would be screened as normals in the routine evaluation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data suggest that dissociation between diabetic retinopathy and albuminuria is less frequent once more sensible DR testing is performed. Hence, albuminuric T1DM patients with a normal fundus should be carefully followed for retinal complications, preferably with FA. This pilot study also detected DR worsening in a relatively short period of time in a group of patients with poor glycemic control. Our conclusions warrant the need for further controlled studies to determine whether detection of preclinical DR by FA should prompt a demand for a customized follow up schedule with reduced screening intervals for this group of patients.

Abbreviations

T1DM: 

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

DR: 

diabetic retinopathy

DM: 

diabetes mellitus

FA: 

fluorescein angiography

eGFR: 

estimated glomerular filtration rate

HbA1c: 

glycated hemoglobin

HPLC: 

high-performance liquid chromatography

CKD-EPI: 

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration

OCT: 

optical coherence tomography

SD-OCT: 

spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

CRT: 

central retinal thickness

ETDRS: 

Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All the authors contributed significantly to this research. Study conceptualization and design: FKM, CVR, SAD. Acquisition of clinical data: FKM, CVR. Clinical analysis and interpretation: FKM, CVR, JRS, PHM, MEF, SAD. Drafting of the manuscript: FKM, CVR, JRS, PHM, MEF, SAD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank ophthalmic technicians Priscila Mariano Moura and Ricardo Fernandes for their help in obtaining retinal images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The corresponding author has access to full data and material.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients that participated in this study. This work does not contain any individual person’s data in any form.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (No. UNIFESP: 1869/11). After explaining the nature of this study, written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Funding

This scientific project was not supported by any funding agency.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
(2)
Department of Endocrinology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

References

  1. Lobo CL, Bernardes RC, Cunha-Vaz JG. Alterations of the blood-retinal barrier and retinal thickness in preclinical retinopathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1364–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1227–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Romero-Aroca P, Fernández-Ballart J, Soler N, Baget-Bernaldiz M, Mendez-Marin I. Review of the relationship between renal and retinal microangiopathy in Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. In: Wagner D, editor. Type 1 diabetes complications. InTech. (2011) Chapter 13. http://www.intechopen.com/books/type-1-diabetes-complications. Accessed 18 May 2015.
  4. Nielsen NV. The normal fundus fluorescein angiogram III. A longitudinal fluorescein angiographic study of the fundus in insulin dependent diabetics without ophthalmoscopically abnormalities. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:311–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirel F, Tepe D, Kara O, Esen I. Microvascular complications in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013;5:145–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Rein DB, Wittenborn JS, Zhang X, Allaire B, Song M, Klein R, Saaddine J. The cost-effectiveness of three screening alternatives for people with diabetes with no or early diabetic retinopathy. Health Serv Res. 2011;46:1534–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Ivanisevic M, Stanic R. Importance of fluorescein angiography in the early detection and therapy of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 1990;201:9–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Roshan B, Warram JH, Krolewskiet AS. In patients with type 1 diabetes and new-onset microalbuminuria the development of advanced chronic kidney disease may not require progression to proteinuria. Kidney Int. 2010;77:57–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Espinel E, Agraz I, Ibernon M, Ramos N, Fort J, Seron D. Renal biopsy in Type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Med. 2015;4:998–1009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang Y, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coreshet J, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms. ETDRS Report Number 11. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:807–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlsen S, Skrivarhaug T, Thue G, Cooper JG, Goransson L, Lovaas K, Sandberg S. Glycemic control and complications in patients with type 1 diabetes—a registry-based longitudinal study of adolescentes and young adults. Pediatric Diabetes. 2016;18:188–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Peeters SA, Engelen L, Bujis J, Chaturvedi N, Fuller JH, Schalkwijk CG, Stehouwer CD, EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2, -3, -10, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 are associated with vascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Rajaab HA, Baker NL, Hunt KJ, Klein R, Cleary PA, Lachin J, Virella G, Lopes-Virella MF, DCCT/EDIC Group of Investigators. The predictive role of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction on the course of diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complic. 2015;29:108–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lobo CL, Bernardes RC, Figueira JP, de Abreu JR, Cunha-Vaz JG. Three-year follow-up study of blood-retinal barrier and retinal thickness alterations in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:211–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen NV, Sorenesn PN, Ditzel J. Retinal fluorescein angiography and hemoglobin A1C in borderline diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 1979;5:97–101.Google Scholar
  18. Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. A1C variability and the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2198–202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. The Writing Team, and Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Effect of insulin therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2002;287:2563.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Penno G, Russo E, Garolfo M, Daniele G, Lucchesi D, Giusti L, Sancho Bornez V, Bianchi C, Dardano A, Miccoli R, Del Prato S. Evidence for two distinct phenotypes of chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2017;60:1102–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinyoun JL, Martin DC, Fujimoto WY, Leonetti DL. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:1888–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chia DSY, Yap EY. Comparison of the effectiveness of detecting diabetic eye disease: diabetic retinal photography versus ophthalmic consultation. Singap Med J. 2004;45:276.Google Scholar
  23. Schellini SA, Carvalho GM, Rendeiro FS, Padovani CR, Hirai FE. Prevalence of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy in a Brazilian population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014;21:33–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Esteves JF, Kramer CK, Azevedo MJ, Stolz AP, Roggia MF, Larangeira A, Miozzo SA, Rosa C, Lambert JH, Pcis M, Rodrigues TC, Canani LHS. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2009;55:268–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jost BS, Hilgemberg E, Rodrigues EB, Danoitti AF, Bonamigo EL. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus in the city of Luzerna—SC. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2010;73:259–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramos SR, Sabbag FP, Busato D, Miranda AB, Moreira CA Jr. Diabetic retinopathy: study from a Diabetic Association. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 1999;62:735–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen X, Zhao Y, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Li Q, Bai L, Zhang M. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in Chongqing pre-diabetes patients. Eye. 2012;26:816–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen NV. The normal retinal fluorescein angiogram I. A study of the fluorescein angiographic appearance of the retina in normal subjects without ophthalmoscopically obvious pathological changes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982;60:657–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement