Skip to main content
Download PDF

Lasting effects of prenatal exposure to Cannabis in the retina of the offspring: an experimental study in mice

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous volume 7, Article number: 45 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prenatal exposure to Cannabis is a worldwide growing problem. Although retina is part of the central nervous system, the impact of maternal Cannabis use on the retinal development and its postnatal consequences remains unknown. As the prenatal period is potentially sensitive in the normal development of the retina, we hypothesized that recreational use of Cannabis during pregnancy may alter retina structure in the offspring. To test this, we developed a murine model that mimics human exposure in terms of dose and use.

Methods

Pregnant BalbC mice were exposed daily for 5 min to Cannabis smoke (0.2 g of Cannabis) or filtered air, from gestational day 5 to 18 (N = 10/group). After weaning period, pups were separated and examined weekly. On days 60, 120, 200, and 360 after birth, 10 pups from each group were randomly selected for Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) analysis of the retina. All retina layers were measured and inner, outer, and total retina thickness were calculated. Other 37 mice from both groups were sacrificed on days 20, 60, and 360 for retinal stereology (total volume of the retina and volume fraction of each retinal layer) and light microscopy. Means and standard deviations were calculated and MANOVA was performed.

Results

The retina of animals which mother was exposed to Cannabis during gestation was 17% thinner on day 120 (young adult) than controls (P = 0.003) due to 21% thinning of the outer retina (P = 0.001). The offspring of mice from the exposed group presented thickening of the IS/OS in comparison to controls on day 200 (P < 0.001). In the volumetric analyzes by retinal stereology, the exposed mice presented transitory increase of the IS/OS total volume and volume fraction on day 60 (young adult) compared to controls (P = 0.008 and P = 0.035, respectively). On light microscopy, exposed mice presented thickening of the IS/OS on day 360 (adult) compared to controls (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Gestational exposure to Cannabis smoke may cause structural changes in the retina of the offspring that return to normal on mice adulthood. These experimental evidences suggest that children and young adults whose mothers smoked Cannabis during pregnancy may require earlier and more frequent clinical care than the non-exposed population.

Background

Cannabis sativa smoking is a common form of illicit drug dependence in developed and developing countries affecting affects from 2.5% to 4.9% of the world’s population between 15 and 64 years old [1]. In the past 15 years its use has been particularly increasing among women in reproductive age [2, 3]. Cannabis smoking during pregnancy either to treat nausea and vomiting, morning sickness or recreational use is alarmingly increasing, 4% to 7% of women reporting its use at least once [4].

Prenatal exposure to Cannabis smoke is associated to birth weight decrease, higher risk of needing neonatal intensive care, teratogenesis, and cognitive effects [1, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Experimental data show that the main psychoactive constituent of Cannabis (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, THC) crosses the placental barrier leading to several adverse effects on the fetus [13]. In addition, THC is present in the breast milk soon after recreational smoking of Cannabis and safe levels of Cannabis use during pregnancy are unknown [14,15,16].

The endocannabinoid receptors type 1 and 2 are present in all retinal layers [17, 18]. These receptors are related to neural modulation and development within the retina and central nervous system (CNS). Thus, we hypothesize that in utero exposure to Cannabis smoke might interfere with normal retina development.

Research into the impact of Cannabis use during pregnancy has focused primarily on brain development and cognitive outcomes in the offspring. The recent advances in Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) imaging allow for the in vivo morphological study through the acquisition of high-definition retinal scans and segmentation of retinal layers. In addition, histologic studies of the retina using stereological techniques allow volumetric analysis of the retinal layers. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate structural changes in the retina of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke during pregnancy with SD-OCT retinal segmentation and histologic stereology analysis.

Methods

Animals

All experimental and animal care procedures were in compliance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH 2002), adhered to the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Research, and were approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School.

Marijuana used in this study received an authorization for scientific purposes by the Núcleo de Perícias Médica Legais—Instituto de Criminalística de Marília legally authorized by the 3a Vara Criminal da Comarca de Marília, Sao Paulo, Brazil. The drug comes from a drug bust conducted by the local police.

Naïve female and male BalbC mice were mated and checked each morning for the presence of a vaginal plug; a positive plug was defined as E0 (E for embryonic period; the letter D will be used in this text to refer to days after birth). Twenty pregnant females were kept in individual cages with food and water ad libitum, in a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle. Mated females were randomly distributed in Cannabis (CAN) or Filtered Air (FA) groups (n = 10 mice per group). The females from CAN group were exposed to smoke from the burning of 0.2 g of Cannabis sativa for five minutes daily inside a smoke apparatus that is described below. Females of the FA group were put into the same apparatus during five minutes daily without burning Cannabis. Exposure to smoke was characterized with presence of THC metabolites in the urine, was checked 24 h after and this procedure was repeated daily from E5 until E17.

Animals gave birth between E19 and E2. After weaning period (P21), male and female offspring were allocated separately in cages (3–4 animal/cage) according to gestational treatment. In this study, SD-OCT imaging data of 10 pups randomly assigned to each group were prospectively collected on D60, D120, D200, and D360. Other 37 pups (18 from CAN group and 19 from FA group) were selected for histologic analysis and were euthanized by overdose of isoflurane (Forane, Abbott Laboratories Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina) on D20, D60, and D360.

Smoke apparatus

The smoke-generating and inhalation device was developed by the Experimental Atmospheric Pollution Lab at University of Sao Paulo as described elsewhere [19]. Briefly, it consisted of three separated chambers for burning, mixing and exposition. Each pregnant mouse spent 5 min daily inside de exposition chamber for inhalation of the burn of Cannabis sativa 0.2 g. The cigarettes were prepared with commercially available paper wrappings.

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging

Subcutaneous injection of a mixture containing 67 mg/kg ketamine and 12 mg/kg xylazine was used for mice anesthesia. Pupils were dilated using tropicamide 1% eye drops (Ciclomidrin, Latinofarma, Sao Paulo, Brasil). Commercially available lubricants were used to prevent corneal drying (Systane, Alcon, Sao Paulo, Brazil).

SD-OCT images were acquired with the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph (HRA) Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). Three horizontal SD-OCT linear B-scans, centered on the optic nerve head, were obtained from each eye. SD-OCT scans were acquired in the automatic real-time mode (ART), averaging 30 frames per image, with a 30º covering field. The images with better quality were selected for analysis (Additional file 1). Retinal layer segmentation was performed automatically with the device internal software and manually corrected when necessary. The retina was segmented in: NFL + GCL (nerve fiber layer plus ganglion cell layer), IPL (inner plexiform layer), INL (inner nuclear layer), OPL (outer plexiform layer), ONL (outer nuclear layer), IS/OS (photoreceptors inner segments and outer segments junction), and RPE (retinal pigment epithelium). Inner retina included NFL + GCL, IPL, and INL and outer retina thickness included OPL, ONL, IS/OS, and RPE (Additional file 1). Thickness measurements were performed 600 µm from the optic disc margin, nasally and temporally. The average values of total retina, inner, outer retina, and from each segmented layer thicknesses were used for analysis.

Retinal stereology and light microscopy

All tissue processing techniques were performed as described previously [21, 22]. Briefly, enucleated eyes were fixed in buffered 4% paraformaldehyde and transferred after 24 h to a 70% alcohol solution for a week. Then, eyes were included in 14% bacteriological agar blocks to guarantee the orientation and processed routinely for histology (paraffin). All blocks were serially sectioned at 5 µm (parallel to optic nerve axis) and at 200 µm intervals one section was collected into glass slides for stereological estimation of volumes (Additional file 2: Figure 2A). All slides were scanned and photographed using Panoramic viewer (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary). ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) software were used to analyze and generate the test systems for stereology. Nearly 24 images per eye were used and a point test system with a reference area of 17 × 103 µm2 per point were superimposed to estimate the volumes by the Cavalieri’s Principle for volumetric measurements of the retinal layers (Additional file 2: Figure 2B). The total volume of the retina and the volume fraction of each retinal layer were calculated. The volume fraction expresses the proportion of a single layer within the whole retina.

For retinal layers thickness measurements, randomly selected cuts from each retina were directly measured at 15 to 20 different points, from which an average thickness value for each retinal layer was obtained (Additional file 3).

Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17.0 was used for Statistical analysis. Collected data from SD-OCT imaging and stereology were analyzed by three-way ANOVA followed by multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) for dependent variables testing (age and sex of the offspring, and mother exposition to either Cannabis smoke or FA during pregnancy). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The null hypothesis was rejected at probability level of P < 0.05.

Results

Retinal thickness under SD-OCT

On D120, total retina of the offspring of the CAN group was 17% thinner than in FA group (242 ± 13 µm vs. 291 ± 17 µm, respectively). In multivariate regression analysis, age*exposition was statistically significant for this outcome (95% CI: 251–263, P = 0.003; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Total retina thickness on SD-OCT of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke or filtered air during pregnancy (mean ± standard deviation). *P = 0.003 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 251–263, age*exposition)

Full size image

On the same time point (D120), outer retina of the offspring was 21% thinner in CAN group than in FA group (117 ± 8 µm vs. 149 ± 13 µm, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed the influence of age*exposition over these outcomes (95% CI: 117–126, P = 0.001; Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inner and outer retina thickness on SD-OCT of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke or filtered air during pregnancy (mean ± standard deviation). Inner retina included nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer (NFL + GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and inner nuclear layer (INL). Outer retina included outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptors inner segments and outer segments junction (IS/OS), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). *P = 0.001 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 117–126, age*exposition)

Full size image

There was no difference between groups regarding inner retina thickness.

The analysis of the thickness of each retinal layer of the offspring showed that on D200 the IS/OS from the CAN group was 68% thicker than in the FA group (58 ± 9 µm vs. 35 ± 18 µm, respectively). Results were influenced by age*exposition (95% CI: 47–54; P = 0.0001; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Retinal layers thickness on SD-OCT of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke or filtered air during pregnancy (mean ± standard deviation).*P = 0.0001 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 47–54, age*exposition)

Full size image

In multivariate regression analysis, after controlling for age, sex, and exposition, NFL + GCL, IPL, INL, OPL, ONL, and RPE thicknesses were similar in CAN and FA groups.

Volumetric analysis under retinal stereology

In multivariate regression analysis, after controlling for age, sex, and exposition, the only retinal layers of the offspring that presented total volume and volume fraction differences were IS/OS and ONL.

The total volume of the IS/OS in the CAN group on D20, D60, and D360 was 0.9 ± 0.3 µm3, 1.7 ± 0.5 µm3, and 0.9 ± 0.3 µm3, respectively, and in the FA group was 1.1 ± 0.3 µm3, 1.1 ± 0.6 µm3, and 1.0 ± 0.3 µm3, respectively. Results were influenced by age*exposition (95% CI: 0.8–1.5, P = 0.008; Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mean total volume of each retina layer under stereology of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke or filtered air during pregnancy. *P = 0.008 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 0.8–1.5, age*exposition)

Full size image

In multivariate regression analysis, after controlling for age, sex, and exposition, the volume of the total retina and each other retinal layers were similar in CAN and FA groups.

The volume fraction of the IS/OS in the CAN group on D20, D60, and D360 was 11 ± 4%, 19 ± 5%, and 18 ± 7%, respectively, and in the FA group was 14 ± 4%, 12 ± 7%, and 16 ± 4%, respectively. Results were influenced by age*exposition (95% CI: 10.6–17.4, P = 0.035; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Mean volume fraction of each retina layer under stereology of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke or filtered air during pregnancy. *P = 0.035 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 10.6–17.4, age*exposition) **P = 0.005 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 22.8–26.4, sex*exposition)

Full size image

The volume fraction of the ONL in the CAN group on D20, D60, and D360 was 26 ± 4%, 28 ± 4%, and 27 ± 4%, respectively, and in the FA group was 27 ± 45, 25 ± 9%, and 21 ± 4%, respectively. Results were influenced by sex*exposition (95% CI: 22.8–26.4, P = 0.005; Fig. 5).

In multivariate regression analysis, after controlling for age, sex, and exposition, the volume fractions of the other retinal layers were similar in CAN and FA groups.

Retinal morphology and thickness under light microscopy

The IS/OS thickness in the CAN group on D20, D60, and D360 was 59 ± 14 µm3, 77 ± 19 µm3, and 97 ± 21 µm3, respectively, and in the FA group was 74 ± 26 µm3, 60 ± 23 µm3, and 60 ± 14 µm3, respectively. Results were influenced by age*exposition (95% CI: 55–78, P = 0.03; Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Retina layers thickness under light microscopy of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke or filtered air during pregnancy (mean ± standard deviation). *P = 0.03 (MANOVA, 95% CI: 55–78, age*exposition)

Full size image

In multivariate regression analysis, after controlling for age, sex, and exposition, there was no difference on either the thickness of total retina or any other retinal layers between CAN and FA groups.

Discussion

In this study we investigated the structural changes in the retina of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke during pregnancy. Our results show that mother exposure to Cannabis smoke during pregnancy causes morphological retinal changes in the offspring that are transitory and return to normal by adulthood. The offspring presents retinal thinning on D120 (young adult) due to outer retina thinning but it returns to normal values on D360 (adult mice). There is also a transitory thickening of the IS/OS from D60 to D200.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study to evaluate the lasting effects of gestational exposure to Cannabis smoke on the retinal structure of the offspring. The method of exposition to Cannabis smoke used in our study mimics real life Cannabis use in terms of dose and use. The dosage to which the subjects were exposed was comparable to those found in humans on recreational Cannabis smoking [19]. The offspring was followed from birth up to one year old (adulthood) so we were able to detect early and late morphological retinal effects in animals whose mothers were exposed to Cannabis smoke during pregnancy.

The SD-OCT measurements showed three significant findings in the offspring of mice exposed to Cannabis smoke during pregnancy compared to controls. First, total retina was 17% thinner on D120 (young adult mice). Second, total retinal was thinner because of the 21% outer retina thinning that occurred on the same time point. And third, the IS/OS was thicker on D200 compared to controls (young adult mice). Eventually, retinal thickness returned to normal values on D360 (adult mice). These findings suggest that Cannabis use during pregnancy causes reversible morphological damage to photoreceptors of the offspring.

The IS/OS thickening seen on D200 may be secondary to the effects of Cannabis on remodeling, apoptosis, and neuroprotection. It is known that the endocannabinoid system plays an important role in neuroprotection due to the promotion of cell survival and inhibition of apoptosis. These mechanisms are very important during the development of the retina, when connections between neurons are in progress [20]. Thus, our results may represent an attempt to decrease cellular losses by apoptosis as studies have demonstrated the role of the endocannabinoid system on neuroplasticity and its neuroprotective action in traumatic and ischemic injuries, inflammation, and neurological damage to the CNS [20]. However, the IS/OS thickening on SD-OCT is transitory and it matches our results on retinal stereology and light microscopy. Although retinal stereology and light microscopy were not performed on D120 and D200, retinal stereology showed that total volume and volume fraction of the IS/OS increased during young adulthood (D60) and returned to normal on adulthood (D360). In contrast, IS/OS thickness did not return to normal values on D360 under light microscopy.

In addition to changes in the IS/OS, retinal stereology showed increase of ONL volume fraction in the young adult mice (D60), suggesting that the same process that occurs in the inner and outer segments of the photoreceptors may also occur in the cell bodies of the photoreceptors. A case report showed reversible a-wave amplitude decrease in the ERG after Cannabis smoking for all scotopic responses, suggesting that photoreceptors function is affected by Cannabis inhalation [21].

Other studies report signs of neuroretinal damage secondary to Cannabis abuse in adult humans. One case report described OCT imaging of subretinal blebs following vision loss in a strong hashish user [22]. González-Pérez et al. found electroretinographic signal reduction in a cohort of Cannabis users, also suggesting photoreceptor damage [23]. Electroretinographic changes were also suggested by further studies in Cannabis users [21, 24]. Bipolar and ganglion cell dysfunction have been also reported in a flash and pattern electroretinogram case–control study suggesting the neurotoxic effects of Cannabis use impair retinal processing [24]. Several other studies also suggest that prenatal exposure to Cannabis may cause ocular damage by other mechanisms, such as vascular or teratogenic [25,26,27].

Clinical studies have shown that the integrity of the retinal layers on SD-OCT is associated with visual acuity and retinal sensitivity [28, 29]. An experimental study using adult BALB/c mice showed that 2-month treatment with intraperitoneal injection of THC caused functional retinal impairment and increased apoptosis in photoreceptors by induction of inflammatory response and oxidative stress. Although the via of administration of THC was different from our study and retinal damage was detected directly in the exposed mice, these are evidences that the use of Cannabis induces an inflammatory state in the retina and it might be related to morphological changes [30]. In our study it is not possible to correlate the morphological changes in young adult and adult mice with functional retinal changes as the design of the study does not allow conclusions to be drawn in this regard. It remains unknown whether Cannabis use causes morphological, neuroretinal disfunction or both [31, 32].

The effects of the active component of Cannabis (THC) can be detected in almost all organs and is mediated by CB1 and CB2 receptors. A study on the normal embryonic development of rats retina shows that ganglion cells and the INL of the retina express CB1 receptors as early as the E15 and E20 [33]. The endocannabinoid system plays an important physiological neuroprotective role in the nervous system favoring cell survival [34], plasticity, and maturation [35, 36]. During the development of the retina there are critical stages of cell elimination (apoptosis), sometimes to remove cells that have not established communications or compromised cells [37,38,39]. Our results suggest that prenatal inhalation of Cannabis smoke by pregnant mice interferes with retinal development of the offspring. This is the experimental confirmation of an expected finding as the endocannabinoid system is present in all retinal layers and in other CNS areas [40].

In this study, we also examined the potential effect of sex differences in gestational Cannabis exposure on retina’s development. Sex-dependent differences have been frequently observed in the biological and behavioral effects of Cannabis use in both animal and human studies [41,42,43,44,45]. Cannabinoids have been shown to exert sex-dependent effects also in other aspects, such as energy balance, anxiety and depression [46]. The pre-natal stress activates gonadal hormones and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system and it causes changes in the neurotransmission modulation and sex hormones [47]. The density and function of CB1 receptor has also been linked to sex differences in behavioral and predisposing to drug addiction in rats [42].

Our study has some limitations. Despite similarities in retinal layers and degree of vascularization [48, 49], human and mice eyes have very different eye volumes. In addition, macula is absent in the murine model and there may be drug susceptibility differences among those species [50,51,52]. The macula is an important anatomic landmark for SD-OCT scans. To overcome the absence of macula in the murine model we used the optic nerve as reference for the SD-OCT scans and measurements were made in triplicates.

Other limitations are the small volume of urine available for the quantification of THC metabolites and the low dose of THC in the Cannabis used in this study. Although we checked daily for the concentration of carboxi-THC in the urine of the pregnant mice, the Cannabis used in this study had significantly less THC than the used nowadays. Therefore, the precise determination of the dose of exposition has been hampered. However, our exposition was very similar to the conducted by Lichtman et al.[52] and the concentration of carboxi-THC detected in our urine samples was the same as reported by the authors for the burning of the same amount used in this study (0.2 g of Cannabis sativa, 5.6 mg/kg). Finally, the relatively low concentration of THC in the Cannabis used in this study values our findings and reinforces the potential toxic effects of Cannabis in the retina of the offspring of pregnant mice exposed to Cannabis smoke.

In terms of Public Health, our findings are particularly relevant as there is an increasing worldwide interest in the legalization of Cannabis. Lately, important studies have been showing positive effects of Cannabis therapeutic use in scenarios of untreatable pain, terminal cancer, obesity, and glaucoma [53]. During pregnancy, Cannabis smoking is commonly used to treat nausea and vomiting, morning sickness or recreational use. However, little is known on the effects of Cannabis in organs formation, including the eye.

In summary, we have shown for the first time that gestational exposure to Cannabis smoke may cause structural changes in the retina of the offspring that return to normal on mice adulthood. These are experimental evidences that suggest that children and young adults whose mothers smoked Cannabis during pregnancy may require earlier and more frequently clinical care than the non-exposed population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

THC:

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol

CNS:

Central nervous system

SD-OCT:

Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

ARVO:

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

E:

Embryonic period

D:

Days after birth

CAN:

Cannabis group

FA:

Filtered air group

HRA:

Heidelberg Retina Angiograph

ART:

Automatic real-time mode

NFL + GCL:

Nerve fiber layer plus ganglion cell layer

IPL:

Inner plexiform layer

INL:

Inner nuclear layer

OPL:

Outer plexiform layer

ONL:

Outer nuclear layer

IS/OS:

Photoreceptors inner segments and outer segments junction

RPE:

Retinal pigment epithelium

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

MANOVA:

Multivariate analysis of variance

SD:

Standard deviation

CI:

Confidence interval

OCT:

Optical Coherence Tomography

CB1:

Cannabinoid receptor 1

CB2:

Cannabinoid receptor 2

References

  1. Gunn JK, Rosales CB, Center KE, Nuñez A, Gibson SJ, Christ C, Ehiri JE. Prenatal exposure to cannabis and maternal and child health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ OPEN. 2016;6:e009986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Conway KP, Green VR, Kasza KA, Silveira ML, Borek N, Kimmel HL, Sargent JD, Stanton CA, Lambert E, Hilmi N, Reissig CJ, Jackson KJ, Tanski SE, Maklan D, Hyland AJ, Compton WM. Co-occurrence of tobacco product use, substance use, and mental health problems among youth: Findings from wave 1 (2013–2014) of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study. Addict Behav. 2018;76:208–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarlenski M, Koma JW, Zank J, Bodnar LM, Bogen DL, Chang JC. Trends in perception of risk of regular marijuana use among US pregnant and nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:705–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bessa MA, Mitsuhiro SS, Chalem E, Barros MM, Guinsburg R, Laranjeira R. Underreporting of use of cocaine and marijuana during the third trimester of gestation among pregnant adolescents. Addict Behav. 2010;35:266–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. English DR, Hulse GK, Milne E, Holman CD, Bower CI. Maternal cannabis use and birth weight: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 1997;92:1553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Navarro M, Rubio P, de Fonseca FR. Behavioural consequences of maternal exposure to natural cannabinoids in rats. Psychopharmacology. 1995;12:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fried PA, Watkinson B. Visuoperceptual functioning differs in 9- to 12-year olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marihuana. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried PA, Smith AM. A literature review of the consequences of prenatal marihuana exposure An emerging theme of a deficiency in aspects of executive function. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2001;23:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huizink AC, Mulder EJ. Maternal smoking, drinking or cannabis use during pregnancy and neurobehavioral and cognitive functioning in human offspring. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:24–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trezza V, Vanderschuren LJ. Cannabinoid and opioid modulation of social play behavior in adolescent rats: differential behavioral mechanisms. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;18:519–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Campolongo P, Trezza V, Palmery M, Trabace L, Cuomo V. Developmental exposure to cannabinoids causes subtle and enduring neurofunctional alterations. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;85:117–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider M. Cannabis use in pregnancy and early life and its consequences: animal models. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;259:383–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chabarria KC, Racusin DA, Antony KM, Kahr M, Suter MA, Mastrobattista JM, Aagaard KM. Marijuana use and its effects in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(506):e1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jakubovic A, Hattori T, McGeer PL. Radioactivity in suckled rats after giving 14 C-tetrahydrocannabinol to the mother. Eur J Pharmacol. 1973;22:221–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill M, Reed K. Pregnancy, breast-feeding, and marijuana: a review article. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68:710–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Conner SN, Carter EB, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Maternal marijuana use and neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(422):e1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu Q, Straiker A, Lu Q, Maguire G. Expression of CB2 cannabinoid receptor mRNA in adult rat retina. Vis Neurosci. 2000;17:91–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. López EM, Tagliaferro P, Onaivi ES, López-Costa JJ. Distribution of CB2 cannabinoid receptor in adult rat retina. Synapse. 2011;65:388–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Benevenuto SG, Domenico MD, Martins MA, Costa NS, de Souza AR, Costa JL, Tavares MF, Dolhnikoff M, Veras MM. Recreational use of marijuana during pregnancy and negative gestational and fetal outcomes: An experimental study in mice. Toxicology. 2017;1(376):94–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yazulla S. Endocannabinoids in the retina: from marijuana to neuroprotection. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27:501–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwitzer T, Robert MP, Giersch A, Angioi-Duprez K, Ingster-Moati I, Pon-Monnier A, Schwan R, Laprevote V. Transient retinal dysfunctions after acute cannabis use. Eur Addict Res. 2016;22:287–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faure C, Schwitzer T, Hansen C, Randhawa S. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Retina. 2016;36:2433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. González Pérez J, Parafita Mato M, Segade García A, Díaz RA. Intraocular motility, electrophysiological tests and visual fields in drug addicts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15:493–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwitzer T, Schwan R, Albuisson E, Giersch A, Lalanne L, Angioi-Duprez K, Laprevote V. Association between regular Cannabis use and ganglion cell dysfunction. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;1(135):54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aktaş S, Tetikoğlu M, İnan S, Aktaş H, Özcura F. Unilateral hemorrhagic macular infarction associated with marijuana, alcohol and antiepileptic drug intake. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017;36:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Corvi F, Querques G, Lattanzio R, Preziosa C, Parodi MB, Bandello F. Central retinal vein occlusion in a young patient following cannabis smoke inhalation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24:437–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamilton R, McGlone L, MacKinnon JR, Russell HC, Bradnam MS, Mactier H. Ophthalmic, clinical and visual electrophysiological findings in children born to mothers prescribed substitute methadone in pregnancy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:696–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Landa G, Su E, Garcia PM, Seiple WH, Rosen RB. Inner segment-outer segment junctional layer integrity and corresponding retinal sensitivity in dry and wet forms of age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2011;31:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sulzbacher F, Kiss C, Kaider A, Eisenkoelbl S, Munk M, Roberts P, Sacu S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Correlation of SD-OCT features and retinal sensitivity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:6448–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Z, Li R, Lu H, Zhang X. Systemic administration with tetrahydrocannabinol causes retinal damage in BALB/c mice. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2020;39:290–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang MTM, DaneshMeyer HV. Cannabinoids and the eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66:327–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwitzer T, Schwan R, Angioi-Duprez K, Lalanne L, Giersch A, Laprevote V. Cannabis use and human retina: The path for the study of brain synaptic transmission dysfunctions in cannabis users. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;106:11–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buckley NE, Hansson S, Harta G, Mezey E. Expression of the CB1 and CB2 receptor messenger RNAs during embryonic development in the rat. Neuroscience. 1998;82:1131–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hillard CJ. Role of cannabinoids and endocannabinoids in cerebral ischemia. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:2347–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu J, Wang L, Harvey-White J, Huang BX, Kim HY, Luquet S, Palmiter RD, Krystal G, Rai R, Mahadevan A, Razdan RK, Kunos G. Multiple pathways involved in the biosynthesis of anandamide. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wei Y, Wang X, Zhao F, Zhao PQ, Kang XL. Cannabinoid receptor 1 blockade protects human retinal pigment epithelial cells from oxidative injury. Mol Vis. 2013;19:357–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fernández-Ruiz JJ, Berrendero F, Hernández ML, Romero J, Ramos JA. Role of endocannabinoids in brain development. Life Sci. 1999;65:725–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fride E. Multiple roles for the endocannabinoid system during the earliest stages of life: pre- and postnatal development. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20(Suppl 1):75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Galve-Roperh I, Aguado T, Rueda D, Velasco G, Guzmán M. Endocannabinoids: a new family of lipid mediators involved in the regulation of neural cell development. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:2319–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Skaper SD, Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoids in nervous system health and disease: the big picture in a nutshell. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367(1607):3193–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Butters JE. Promoting healthy choices: the importance of differentiating between ordinary and high risk cannabis use among high-school students. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:845–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Castelli MP, Fadda P, Casu A, Spano MS, Casti A, Fratta W, Fattore L. Male and female rats differ in brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor density and function and in behavioural traits predisposing to drug addiction: effect of ovarian hormones. Current Pharmacetical Design. 2014;20:100–13.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rubino T, Vigano D, Realin N, Guidali C, Braida D, Capurro V. Chronic delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol during adolescence provokes sex-dependent changes in the emotional profile in adult rats: behavioral and biochemical correlates. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:2760–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Silva L, Black R, Michaelides M, Hurd YL, Dow-Edwards D. Sex and age specific effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol during the periadolescent period in the rat: the unique susceptibility of the prepubescent animal. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2016;58:88–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fattore L, Fratta W. How important are sex differences in cannabinoid action? Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:544–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Farhang B, Diaz S, Tang SL, Wagner EJ. Sex differences in the cannabinoid regulation of energy homeostasis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34((Suppl 1(0 1)):S237-46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sandi C, Haller J. Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(5):290–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Feit-Leichman RA, Kinouchi R, Takeda M, Fan Z, Mohr S, Kern TS, Chen DF. Vascular damage in a mouse model of diabetic retinopathy: relation to neuronal and glial changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Berger A, Cavallero S, Dominguez E, Barbe P, Simonutti M, Sahel JA, Sennlaub F, Raoul W, Paques M, Bemelmans AP. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the rodent eye: highlighting layers of the outer retina using signal averaging and comparison with histology. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e936494.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Danis RP, Bingaman DP, Yang Y, Ladd B. Inhibition of preretinal and optic nerve head neovascularization in pigs by intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:2099–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Penha FM, Rodrigues EB, Maia M, Dib E, Fiod Costa E, Furlani BA, Nunes MoraesFilho M, Dreyfuss JL, Bottós J, Farah ME. Retinal and ocular toxicity in ocular application of drugs and chemicals–part I: animal models and toxicity assays. Ophthalmic Res. 2010;44:82–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lichtman AH, Poklis JL, Poklis A, Wilson DM, Martin BR. The pharmacological activity of inhalation exposure to marijuana smoke in mice. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;63:107–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Panahi Y, Manayi A, Nikan M, Vazirian M. The arguments for and against cannabinoids application in glaucomatous retinopathy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;86:620–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

CNPq 448243/2014-8, CNPq 313878/2018-8, and CAPES Social Demand Doctorate.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Paulo Roberto Arruda Zantut and Mariana Matera Veras contributed equally for this study

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Retina Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Paulo Roberto Arruda Zantut, Gustavo Sakuno, Walter Yukihiko Takahashi & Francisco Max Damico

  2. Laboratory of Experimental Air Pollution, Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Mariana Matera Veras, Sarah Gomes Menezes Benevenutto, Victor Yuji Yariwake, Janaina Iannicelli Torres, Marco Antonio Garcia Martins & Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva

  3. Ophthalmology Service, Department of Surgery, Veterinary Medicine College and Zootechny, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Angélica Mendonça Vaz Safatle, Ricardo Augusto Pecora & Aline Adriana Bolzan

Authors
  1. Paulo Roberto Arruda Zantut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariana Matera Veras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah Gomes Menezes Benevenutto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Angélica Mendonça Vaz Safatle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ricardo Augusto Pecora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Victor Yuji Yariwake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Janaina Iannicelli Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gustavo Sakuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marco Antonio Garcia Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Aline Adriana Bolzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Walter Yukihiko Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Francisco Max Damico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PRAZ conceived and planned the experiments, carried out the experiments, contributed to sample preparation, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and took the lead in writing the manuscript. MMV conceived and planned the experiments, carried out the experiments, contributed to sample preparation, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and took the lead in writing the manuscript. SGMB carried out the experiments and contributed to sample preparation. AMVS conceived and planned the experiments, carried out the experiments, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. RAP contributed to the interpretation of the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. VYY carried out the experiments, contributed to sample preparation, and contributed to the interpretation of the results. JIT contributed to the interpretation of the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. GS carried out the experiments and contributed to sample preparation. MAGM carried out the experiments and contributed to sample preparation. AAB conceived and planned the experiments, carried out the experiments, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. WYT conceived and planned the experiments and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. PHNS conceived and planned the experiments and took the lead in writing the manuscript. FMD conceived and planned the experiments, carried out the experiments, contributed to sample preparation, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and took the lead in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Max Damico.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental and animal care procedures were in compliance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH 2002), adhered to the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Research, and were approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee of the Universidade de Sao Paulo Medical School.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1

Retinal segmentation in a BALB/c mouse SD-OCT B-scan.

Additional file 2: Figure S2

Stereological analysis of the retina.

Additional file 3: Figure S3:

Photomicrographs of histological cross sections of the mouse retina.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zantut, P.R.A., Veras, M.M., Benevenutto, S.G.M. et al. Lasting effects of prenatal exposure to Cannabis in the retina of the offspring: an experimental study in mice. Int J Retin Vitr 7, 45 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00314-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00314-8

Keywords

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous

ISSN: 2056-9920

Contact us