- Original article
- Open Access
Eales’ disease: epidemiology, diagnostic and therapeutic concepts
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous volume 8, Article number: 3 (2022)
To describe the epidemiological traits, clinical characteristics, diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions and evolution in a large series of patients with diagnosis of Eales’ disease.
A clinical retrospective review of patients with Eales’ disease, evaluated and treated between April 2009 and April 2018, with a 1-year minimum follow-up. Thirty patients (59 eyes), were included. Age, sex, laboratory results (CBC, glycemia, protein electrophoresis, ACE levels) immunological profile and a Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test were recorded. The patients were divided into groups according to their evolution, medical or surgical treatment, and visual outcomes.
Seventeen male patients and 13 female patients were included, and their ages ranged from 14 to 35 years. The Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test was positive in 25 patients. Twenty-eight patients had unilateral vitreous hemorrhage, 10 of whom presented with vasculitis and non-perfusion areas in the contralateral eye, 9 presented contralateral peripheral neovascularization and 9 had contralateral fibrovascular proliferation. The remaining 2 patients presented with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In 6 patients, conservative treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and photocoagulation was performed after the hemorrhage cleared. Twenty-two patients, required vitrectomy, with good visual outcomes. Macular edema was found in 16 eyes, which responded to periocular and/or systemic corticosteroid therapy, except for 9 eyes that required intravitreal bevacizumab, with complete resolution in 7 eyes and partial resolution in 2 eyes.
Eales’ disease is a pathology of significant prevalence in our country. The distribution according to sex, tends to be equivalent. The etiology, even when it is not specifically determined, according to laboratory tests, confirms the probable immunologic response in the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens. This is still a diagnosis of exclusion, and therefore, it is advisable to perform a complete laboratory work-up in each case. Timely application of laser and other medical treatments, help to avoid progression to more advanced stages and their complications. The surgical treatment of vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage, and/or tractional vitreous detachment yields good primary anatomical and functional outcomes. Secondary macular edema responds to periocular and intravitreal corticosteroids, and in refractory cases, the use of anti-VEGF therapy leads to an effective resolution.
Eales’ disease, constitutes an idiopathic occlusive retinal vasculopathy apparently multifactorial, and with a likely immunologic origin, which mainly affects the peripheral retina bilaterally in young patients predominantly males [1, 2]. The largest series of cases have been described in India and Southeast Asia . In our country, we consider it to be fairly prevalent and relevant in a global context.
Its occlusive, inflammatory, vascular and potentially ischemic nature—generating extensive areas of non-perfusion and resulting neovascularization, as well as changes in the structure of the vitreous and its interaction with the retina, are responsible for its wide range of clinical manifestations depending on the evolution of the process. In its evolution we can find vitreous hemorrhages, macular edema, tractional retinal detachments, and less frequently, secondary rhegmatogenous or mixed RD, as well as secondary neovascular glaucoma.
Different therapeutic interventions, including pharmacological therapy, laser and/or surgery have been reported, and they are used independently or in combination according to the patient’s needs, and determined by the specific clinical situation.
In this study, we report epidemiological features, diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions with their results and evolution, in a large series of patients with a long follow-up.
Patients and methods
A total of 30 patients with a diagnosis of Eales’ disease were included in this study. They were treated at the Retina and Vitreous Department at the Clinica del Ojo in La Paz, Bolivia, between April 2009 and April 2018.
Epidemiological data were collected, including age and sex, previous relevant systemic history and ophthalmological disease, primary reason for attending the clinic, clinical features, including best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and biomicroscopy of anterior and posterior segments. The results from diagnostic procedures included the following: fluorescein angiography, ocular ultrasound (when necessary) and optical coherence tomography of the macula.
Based on the clinical findings and the complementary diagnostic studies, we assigned a clinical stage for each patient according to the proposed classification of Saxena and Kumar  and the presence or absence of macular edema was also documented. Similarly, a laboratory work-up was obtained including: complete blood count, glycemia, protein electrophoresis, levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), immunologic profile (PCR, sed rate, rheumatoid factor, ANA, antiDNA, antiCCP, cANCA, pANCA), Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test, and chest X-ray.
Medical or surgical treatment of each eye was recorded, as well as the anatomic (clearing the visual media, retinal reattachment, RNV involution) and functional results (baseline best-corrected visual acuities and the ones obtained in the last follow-up).
Patients with insufficient data in the clinical chart and those who did not complete at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded from the study.
Thirty patients (60 eyes) were diagnosed with Eales’ disease between 2009 and 2018, 53% of those were females and 47% were male. The median age of presentation was 34 years, with a range from 16 to 49, and a greater prevalence was found between the second and fourth decades of life (Table 1).
Systemic arterial hypertension was detected in 1 patient and quiescent rheumatoid arthritis was detected in 1 patient. There was no relevant systemic past history in the remaining patients (Table 1), and no patient had a previous relevant ophthalmological history.
The main reason for attending the clinic was unilateral sudden painless loss of vision (80%), followed by myodesopsias. One patient was found during a routine examination (Table 2).
The best-corrected visual acuity of the eye responsible for the consultation, ranged between HM and 20/40, and the contralateral eye’s vision ranged between 20/50 and 20/20. Fifty-nine eyes did not show any abnormalities in biomicroscopy of the anterior segment. Only one eye showed inflammatory signs (cells 2 + and fine keratic precipitates). Intraocular pressures were found to be within normal limits in all cases. The most common clinical finding of the posterior segment was unilateral vitreous hemorrhage of variable degree (Table 2). This occurred in 27 eyes, varying from grade II-III, allowing good visualization of the peripheral retina in several cases. One patient presented vitreous hemorrhage associated with a mixed retinal detachment and the remaining 2 patients presented with peripheral sheathing and fibrous proliferation.
In 11 eyes of the 30 patients, there was retinal vascular sheathing, predominantly in the mid-periphery, compromising the posterior pole in 36.4% of cases and areas of non-perfusion in the contralateral eye (Figs. 1, 2). In 9 patients, there was contralateral peripheral neovascularization, 3 patients presented absolute neovascular glaucoma, and in the remaining 7 patients areas of fibrovascular proliferation in the contralateral eye, were clinically appreciated (Table 2).
A clinical stage was assigned for each eye based on the classification proposed by Saxena and Kumar . Most of our patients (45%) were in a stage IIIb in the symptomatic eye and IIa (18%) in the contralateral eye (Table 3).
FA showed areas of non-perfusion with a predominant location posterior to the equator in the mid-periphery (Figs. 3, 4) and RNV with leakage in the late phases of 50.8% (eyes that we were able to visualize), followed by areas of non-perfusion in 28.8%, and peripheral sheathing with vascular changes (tortuosity, changes in the vascular caliber, AV shunts) in the contralateral remaining eyes (5%) (Table 4). Cystoid macular edema was evidenced by FA in 10 eyes, with late diffuse leakage in 7 cases and a petaloid pattern in the remaining 3 (Table 4).
In the eyes with dense vitreous hemorrhage (9 eyes) an ultrasound was performed, which showed integrity of the retinochoroidal complex in all cases. All eyes were examined with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) of the macula at the time of diagnosis or after clearing of the media. Macular edema was present in 16 of the eyes (27%), with central thickening and intraretinal cysts in 14 of the cases, 3 of which showed evidence of vitreofoveal traction, and the remaining 2 eyes showed diffuse perifoveal thickening (Table 4).
Twenty-three patients (76.7%) had a positive Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test, and the remaining laboratory results were all within normal limits.
Regarding treatment, conservative management was followed in eyes without vitreous hemorrhage, in those patients with vitreous hemorrhage grade I or at least 4 weeks of evolution, and in those eyes whose media cleared in less than 8 weeks, with intravitreal anti-VEGF according to the evolution and retinal photocoagulation in areas of non-perfusion after clearing of the media (59%), guided by fluorescein angiography, once the effect of the anti-VEGF wore off (Fig. 5).
In 20 eyes with vitreous hemorrhage where there was no spontaneous clearing after anti-VEGF and/or more than 2 months of evolution without spontaneous clearing of the hemorrhage (34%) a pars plana vitrectomy was performed with laser endophotocoagulation (Figs. 6, 7), and associated with a scleral buckle and posterior retinal reattachment in those cases with mixed peripheral retinal detachment. In 18 eyes, clearing of the media was achieved and regression of the retinal neovascularization was confirmed by control angiography. The two remaining cases required additional posterior photocoagulation post-vitrectomy. All patients received periocular corticosteroids during the active inflammatory phase of the disease and in 38% of cases treatment with systemic corticosteroids (prednisone PO 1 mg/kg for 7 days with a gradual reduction of the dose depending on the individual response of each patient) (Table 5).
Patients with retinal detachment, were treated with scleral buckle + cryoretinopexy and scleral buckle + pars plana vitrectomy, both with effective reattachment of the retina and visual recovery (Table 5).
With regard to the patients with macular edema, 7 eyes received treatment with periocular and/or systemic corticosteroids, with edema resolution, flattening of the retinal thickening and improvement of visual acuity in all cases, without complications (Fig. 7). The remaining 9 eyes received intravitreal bevacizumab, with complete resolution in 7 eyes and partial resolution in 2. All refractory cases received aflibercept and one of them received intravitreal placement of dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) with significant edema reduction, but no complete resolution (Table 5). All these eyes, improved their visual acuity to different degrees following treatment (Fig. 8).
In 100% of cases clearing of the media was achieved, as well as regression of the neovascularization and retinal reattachment (in the corresponding cases). All patients presented functional improvement (except those who had a stage IVb at the time of initial diagnosis) with favorable changes or stability in visual acuity (Table 6).
The largest series of cases with Eales’ disease reported in the literature come from India [2,3,4], Southeast Asia  and Germany . The epidemiology of this disease in Latin America has not been reported. In our country, however, it constitutes a pathology of significant frequency, comparable with that of other countries. This epidemiologic finding becomes relevant considering the significant prevalence in populations of different racial origins, suggesting that-genetic makeup does not determine the etiology-, or the development of the disease, and reinforcing instead the most accepted theory that links the origin of this vasculopathy with an abnormal immunologic response to the antigenic fragments of Mycobacterium tuberculosis [2, 3, 6]. This finding also highlights the fact that in Bolivia, we still register a high incidence and prevalence of tuberculosis .
Immunology-based etiopathogenesis has been proposed, as a reaction to genetic material and the presence of non-viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis fractions, which has been supported by strong evidence. Furthermore, statistically significant portions of M. tuberculosis DNA have been detected upon vitreous PCR analysis, and in epirretinal membrane analysis form Eales’ disease patients. Moreover, other retrospective and prospective studies also found other Mycobacterium (chelonae and fortuitum)  using optimized seminested polymerase chain reactions, reinforcing their causal relationship and extending in to other Mycobacterium species, in addition to tuberculosis. In contrast, some authors performed RT-PCR on vitreous biopsies and found a significant Mycobacteria inoculum in at least 50% of their samples; reinforcing the possibility of vasculitis being a reaction to an active infectious agent and not just an immune response .
On the other hand, a possible association with autoimmune systemic disease has been reported, and neurological and hematological disorders have also been mentioned . Our series showed coexisting autoimmune disease in only one patient, but no other clinical or paraclinical analysis suggested other systemic diseases.
Immunohistochemical analysis showed lymphocytic infiltration, especially T lymphocytes, consistent with type IV hypersensitivity, which is a characteristic response to tuberculin, but can also be an expression of the autoimmune mechanism triggered by retinal S-antigen .
Vitreous biochemical analysis showed significant increase in several growth factors, specially VEGF, in contrast to a PEDF reduction –a potent ischemia inhibitor - and increased reactive substances, such as TBARS, and decreased E and C vitamins, superoxide dismutase, glutathione and glutathione peroxidase, suggesting oxidative stress .
Our case series demonstrates that this disease is most common in young adults and the sex distribution is equivalent, which differs from the classic descriptions of a clear male gender dominance [1, 2, 5, 12], but it matches smaller case series reflecting a more even gender distribution .
A total of 76.6% of patients in our study had a positive Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test, which is of relative value, since it only demonstrates immunologic memory of Mycobacteria. Since tuberculosis is endemic in our country, our population received the BCG vaccine, which reduces the specificity of this test for the detection of active tuberculosis cases .
We noticed bilateral involvement in 100% of our cases. However, it is important to mention the asymmetric evolution of a significant percentage of these cases, which allowed us to intervene at the early stages of many contralateral eyes in those patients with unilateral symptoms. This fact, also reinforces our recommendation of a careful evaluation (under pharmacological dilation) looking for subtle or peripheral signs in the periphery of asymptomatic eyes.
Only one case in our series, presented with signs of anterior uveitis, primarily cell and fine keratic precipitates. In fact, anterior segment inflammation is not usually part of these patients’ presentation and in those few cases where it was present it may have been due to spillover phenomenon , in those cases with a severe stage IIIb inflammatory process.
The most common reason for initial consultation was a reduction in visual acuity, secondary to vitreous hemorrhage, in patients previously asymptomatic and without relevant ocular or systemic comorbidity. The clinical stages associated with vitreous hemorrhage correlated to those with retinal neovascularization, confirming the cause-effect relationship. However, despite the advanced stages of these patients, the evolution is favorable if treated in a timely manner, because it lacks other components that could exacerbate the process, such as those of diabetes. Additionally, even though they share similar clinical and evolutionary characteristics, the behavior of Eales’ disease is less aggressive than that of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. We found this phenomenon even in cases with large areas of non-perfusion and/or aggressive neovascularization, probably because Eales’ pathology does not originate from a systemic metabolic disorder, or permanent endothelial dysfunction such as diabetic retinopathy .
Retinal vasculitis is located in the mid periphery, post-equatorial or equatorial in 64% of cases with a central predominant component in 36%. Some cases in early stages with close follow-up of its progression or recurrence post-treatment, display new spots of vasculitis in different meridians, always in the mid-periphery or closer to the center, but not in the most peripheral sectors. However, areas of vascular shutdown, extend to the pre-equatorial and extreme periphery in some cases where neovascularization tends to develop in transition areas between perfused and ischemic retina, which is why careful clinical exploration and complementary studies, especially fluorescein angiography should be able to demonstrate the most peripheral locations up to 360°, with new wide-field techniques probably optimal for evaluation and follow-up.
Similarly, associated macular edema is less common than in other retinal pathologies, the treatment response to a timely intervention is favorable, and the results are stable over time. Spectral domain OCT is an ideal tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of macular edema as well as abnormalities in the vitreoretinal interphase that could develop. OCT-A could also be valuable to evaluate other associated phenomena, such as macular ischemia, that could easily explain visual loss in some cases [12, 14], with an added advantage of its non-invasive quality and reproducible results.
Even though the clinical characteristics of Eales’ are usually quite distinctive and match those of the series of cases, this disease remains an exclusion diagnosis, which must be considered on the basis of clinical findings since it lacks a specific, conclusive diagnostic test. Therefore, all laboratory tests and referrals to other specialties -if needed- to rule out other causes of retinal vasculitis must be carried out without delay.
There were some differences regarding clinical features in our series compared to others, 100% of our patients showed bilateral compromise, compared to 73 and 87% reported in the largest case series in Asia [2, 4] and Europe , however, during follow-up these numbers increased to 81 and 98% respectively, reinforcing that asymmetry is frequent and both eyes are involved at some point, responding to previously established etiopathogenic mechanisms. Also, recently developed diagnostic tools, such as ultra-wide-field angiography and retinography are able to detect this changes on early stages. Vascular features in our patients showed venous sheathing in most of the cases, associated to vascular dilatation and tortuosity, microhemorrhages, AV shunts and neovascularization in the transition areas, between perfused and ischemic retina, these changes were consistent with previous reports. However, our patients did not present telangiectasias or microaneurysms, which are the first manifestation of internal retinal-blood barrier disruption in other retinopathies, different from Eales’ disease.
As for topographic features in our series, the main difference is a significant number of centrally located clinical characteristics-up to 36%-compared to the 10% rate, stablished by previous reports [2,3,4,5]. However, we must point out, that most of our patients didn't show disc neovascularization, compared with variable rates-between 1 and 6.2%-in other studies [2, 4], which can be attributed to the fact, that even if central compromise is common, corresponding non-perfusion and ischemic areas weren’t equivalent in extension. Additionally, we noticed that cystoid macular edema is the most frequent form of macular affection. 27% of cases showed vitreofoveal traction component and just 2% of them had epiretinal membranes; similarly to other series outcomes.
Combined treatment with anti-VEGF, systemic, periocular and/or intraocular corticosteroids, or external or intraoperatory laser photocoagulation in ischemic areas depending on the case, has shown favorable results [12, 15, 16], with structural and functional improvement. Similarly, macular edema and abnormalities in the vitreoretinal interphase, although less frequent, have been demonstrated to be treatable with the expected visual improvement.
Ocular comorbidities, such as retinal detachment, respond quite well to conventional surgical treatments, and we found that inflammation does not play a determinant role in the postoperative evolution. Obviously, the appropriate peri and postoperative control of any sign of inflammation must be taken into consideration to minimize its impact, and following surgery, once the retina is reattached, it is important to complete the ablation treatment of ischemic areas if they are present. There is still a need to establish diagnostic and therapeutic protocols that best fit the clinical stage and individual characteristics of each case (including the contralateral eye’s condition, presence of macular edema, etc.). Additionally, we will surely find more efficient applications of current technology such as angiographic studies of ultra-wide field, new generation anti-VEGF, and sustained release intraocular steroid devices, which will improve our diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities and help achieve more favorable visual outcomes.
Eales’ disease is an ocular pathology with significant prevalence in our country. This bilateral vasculitis shows a similar frequency in young patients of both sexes, with specific clinical findings, but no specific diagnostic test, which is why a full laboratory work-up must be obtained for these patients in all cases.
The initial symptom is often a vitreous hemorrhage, usually without a preceding ocular history, and because of the bilateral nature of Eales it mandates a thorough examination of the fellow eye. With an early diagnosis, initiating treatment is significantly easier, and the results of the contralateral eye are usually favorable.
Treatment of the underlying pathology, as well as any secondary ocular comorbidity has a good prognosis and the rational, combined use of antiangiogenic, corticosteroid and laser therapy may provide a synergistic effect. Surgery has formal indications, and its outcome is favorable when combined with adequate pharmacologic control of the underlying process to minimize its impact. Our study has limitations because of its retrospective nature; future investigations with a prospective design are required to establish adequate diagnostic and therapeutic protocols that include the latest technology to optimize visual outcomes.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Saxena S, Kumar D. New classification system-based visual outcome in Eales’ disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55(4):267–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.33038.
Biswas J, Sharma T, Gopal L, Madhavan HN, Sulochana KN, Ramakrishnan S. Eales disease–an update. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(3):197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00288-6.
Tsui JC, Fine HF. Eales Disease. Medscape. Ophthalmology. 2018.
Errera MH, Pratas A, Goldschmidt P, Sedira N, Sahel JA, Benesty J. La maladie de Eales [Eales’ disease]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016;39(5):474–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2016.03.001.
Stoffelns BM, Kramann C, Schoepfer K. Morbus Eales–10 Jahre Erfahrung mit einem seltenen Krankheitsbild [Eales’ disease–10 years experience with a rare disease]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009;226(4):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1109260 (Epub 2009 Apr 21).
Therese KL, Deepa P, Therese J, Bagyalakshmi R, Biswas J, Madhavan HN. Association of mycobacteria with Eales’ disease. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126:56–62.
Indicadores básicos de salud. OPS/OMS https://www.paho.org/data/index.php/es/?option=com_content&view=article&id=515:indicadoresviz&Itemid=347. Accessed 14 Dic 2020 .
Singh R, Toor P, Parchand S, Sharma K, Gupta V, Gupta A. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in So-called Eales’ Disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2012;20(3):153–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2012.658134.
Saxena S, Rajasingh J, Biswas S, et al. Cellular immune response to retinal S-antigen and interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein fragments in Eales disease patients. Pathobiology. 1999;67:39–44.
Verma A, Biswas J, Radhakrishnan S, Narayanasamy A. Intra-ocular expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and pigment epithelial-derived factor (PEDF) in a case of Eales’ disease by immunohistochemical analysis: a case report. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(4):429–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-009-9338-3.
Biswas J, Ravi RK, Naryanasamy A, Kulandai LT, Madhavan HN. Eales’ disease - current concepts in diagnosis and management. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2013;3(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1869-5760-3-11.
Biswas J, Pal B, Gondhale HP, Kharel SR. Long-Term Outcomes of a Large Cohort of Patients with Eales’ Disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26(6):870–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2017.1298817.
Renie WA, Murphy RP, Anderson KC, Lippman SM, McKusick VA, Proctor LR, Shimizu H, Patz A, Fine SL. The evaluation of patients with Eales’ disease. Retina. 1983;3(4):243–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-198300340-00001.
Saxena S, Kumar D. Macular involvement in Eales disease. Ann Ophthalmol. 2000;32(2):98–100.
Atmaca LS, Batioglu F, Atmaca SP. A long-term follow-up of Eales’ disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2002;10(3):213–21. https://doi.org/10.1076/ocii.10.3.213.15598.
Biswas J, Shah SS. Evaluation of the efficacy of using periocular and or systemic steroid in the inflammatory stage of Eales’ disease. Indian Ophthalmol Today. 1995;2:266–7.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved for our Ethics committee.
Consent for publication
A consent form from each patient were collected.
The authors declare no that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Murillo López, S., Medina Medina, S. & Murillo López, F. Eales’ disease: epidemiology, diagnostic and therapeutic concepts. Int J Retin Vitr 8, 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00354-0
- Eales’ disease
- Occlusive retinal vasculopathy
- Vitreous hemorrhage
- Macular edema