Skip to main content
Download PDF

Visual acuity after cataract surgery in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 Stage 3 to 5

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous volume 8, Article number: 38 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual acuity after cataract surgery in eyes with Macular Telangiectasia (MacTel) Type 2.

Methods

Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with MacTel Type 2 who underwent cataract surgery and were managed at the same institution. Patients underwent pre-operative assessment by a retinal specialist with examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the same institution. The main outcome measure was the post-operative change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary study outcomes were achieving post-operative BCVA better than Snellen acuity of 20/40 and time to BCVA loss by two lines or more (10 or more ETDRS letters).

Results

A total of 20 eyes (11 patients) underwent cataract surgery and were followed for a median of 25.5 months (IQR 17.5–44.2 months). The median post-operative BCVA improvement was 10.5 letters (IQR 3.50–20.25). Nuclear sclerosis severity [β = 8.99 (95% CI 3.35, 14.6), p = 0.00177] was associated with post-operative change in BCVA and central foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) breaks [OR 1.33 × 10–9 (95% CI 5.12 × 10–10–3.43 × 10−9), p < 0.001] on OCT was inversely correlated with post-operative BCVA > 20/40 using a multivariate generalized linear model. Central foveal EZ breaks [HR 1.77 × 109 (95% CI 3.86 × 108, 8.11 × 109), p < 0.001] and MacTel Type 2 disease stage [HR 2.83, (95% CI 1.12, 7.12), p = 0.027] were independently associated with shorter time to vision loss of two lines or more in a multivariate Cox regression model.

Conclusions

Visual acuity significant improved after cataract surgery in eyes with MacTel Type 2 regardless of disease severity. The presence of central foveal EZ breaks may predict poorer post-operative visual acuity and subsequent vision loss from disease progression.

Background

Macular telangiectasia (MacTel) Type 2 is a bilateral, progressive, neurodegenerative disease of uncertain etiology with characteristic vascular changes and apparent cell loss within the retina. The vascular changes are likely secondary to loss of retinal cells such as Muller glia [1,2,3]. Characteristic changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) include hyporeflective spaces (“cavities” or cavitations) in the inner and outer retina, central retinal thinning and apparent loss of the photoreceptor ellipsoid zone [EZ, formerly known as the inner-segment (IS)/outer-segment (OS) junction line] [4] that appear as focal disruption of the EZ. Such disruption of the EZ likely represents loss of photoreceptor cells [3]. Generally, focal EZ disruption begins in the extra-foveal temporal macula, progressing to involve the foveal center and then the nasal macula. Progressive EZ loss has been associated with progressive focal loss of macular sensitivity measured by microperimetry [5, 6] and focal electrophysiological dysfunction measured by multifocal electroretinography [7]. EZ disruption in the foveal center is closely correlated with loss of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [6, 8, 9].

MacTel Type 2 typically presents after the fifth or sixth decade of life [4, 10], when the occurrence of visually-significant cataracts is also common [11]. In eyes with MacTel Type 2, like any other pre-existing macular pathology, the decision to proceed with cataract surgery is often a challenging one. Firstly, the benefit of cataract surgery in eyes with MacTel Type 2 is uncertain, given that any reduced visual acuity can be due to disruption of macular architecture by the MacTel Type 2 disease process rather than the cataract itself. Secondly, cataract surgery itself can potentially exacerbate pre-existing retinal disease. In a Phase II clinical trial of ranibizumab for non-neovascular Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 patients, one participant demonstrated marked increase in vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography and retinal thickness on OCT following cataract surgery [12]. However, the effect of cataract surgery on the progression of MacTel Type 2 has not been systematically studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate visual acuity outcomes in patients with Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 following cataract surgery.

Methods

Patient selection

This study is a single-center retrospective cohort design of patients with Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 (MacTel Type 2) who had undergone cataract surgery and were managed at the Wilmer Eye Institute between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018. Approval by the local institutional review board was obtained for all study-related acquisition and HIPAA regulations were followed. Inclusion criteria included (i) a clinical diagnosis of Macular Telangiectasia Type 2, based on findings of fundoscopy, OCT and fluorescein angiography; (ii) an eye examination and a Macula OCT performed at the same institution before cataract surgery; and (iii) at least 3 weeks of follow up with a final post-operative manifest refraction.

Exclusion criteria included concurrent vitreoretinal surgery at the time of cataract surgery, any corneal pathology or other media opacity that affected the visual axis, and initiation of intravitreal VEGF-inhibitors within 6 months of cataract surgery.

Study parameters

The patients’ characteristics including age at surgery, sex, ethnicity, and comorbid medical conditions were recorded. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured by transilluminated distance Snellen or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. Recorded Snellen BCVA was converted to approximate ETDRS letters [13] for analysis and reporting.

Disease staging of macular telangiectasia was carried out using the classification system proposed by Gass and Blodi [14] following evaluation by a retina specialist. Cross-sectional OCT images were examined for ellipsoid zone (EZ) break(s) in the foveal center. An EZ break is defined as a disruption in the continuity of the hyper-reflective layer representing the EZ on OCT. The foveal center on OCT is defined by deepest central point in the foveal pit marked by the absence or near absence of the inner nuclear layer (INL) and the relative enlargement of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) [15]. Early macular OCT images were taken using Time Domain (TD)-OCT (Stratus; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Subsequent macular OCT images were taken using Spectral-Domain (SD)-OCT either on the the Spectralis HRA-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) or the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). We therefore decided to use a categorical grading system rather than quantifying the EZ loss due to the potential variability in EZ detection between these systems.

Cataract grading was carried out with slit lamp examination by the operating cataract surgeon according to the WHO grading system [16].

Study outcome measures

The primary study outcome was the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after cataract surgery. The BCVA recorded at the pre-operative examination and the post-operative BCVA after manifest refraction recorded between 3 weeks and 2 months following cataract surgery were used for analysis.

Secondary study outcomes were achieving post-operative BCVA better than Snellen acuity of 20/40 and time to BCVA loss of 2 lines or more (10 or more ETDRS letters). In determining BCVA loss in patients who developed posterior capsular opacification, only the final visual acuity after YAG capsulotomy was taken into account.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using R version 3.5.2. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The same variables were analyzed for the primary and secondary study outcomes. Because most patients had both eyes included, statistical procedures utilizing generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to account for the correlation between both eyes from the same patient. In GEE, dependence within clusters (eyes) are accounted for by estimating population-averaged effects. For continuous and categorical dependent variables, GEE-incorporated generalized linear and logistic regression were carried out using the “PGEE” package [17]. Variables found to be statistically significant on univariate analysis were incorporated into the corresponding multivariate models. For survival analysis, Cox regression with the “cluster” function was carried out for each variable using the “survival” package [18]. The “cluster” function is analogous to GEE in accounting for correlation between both eyes from the same patient. Statistically significant variables on univariate clustered Cox regression were then entered into a multivariate clustered Cox regression model.

Results

A total of 20 eyes of 11 patients underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery using the Alcon Infiniti Vision System (Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland) during the study period. All eyes were implanted with acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses. No toric or multifocal lenses were used. Sex and ethnicity were excluded from subsequent multivariate analyses due to the small number of male (1 male, 10 female) and Asian patients (1 Asian, 10 White or Caucasian), respectively. Median follow-up was 25.5 months (IQR 17.5–44.2 months) and mean follow-up was 40.0 months. The median age at the time of cataract surgery was 69.0 years (IQR 63.7–78.0 years). Three eyes had stage 3 disease, 15 eyes had stage 4 disease, and 2 eyes had stage 5 disease. Thirteen out of 20 eyes (65%) had evidence of central foveal EZ breaks at baseline.

The median improvement in ETDRS letters post cataract surgery was 10.5 letters (IQR 3.50–20.25, p = 0.0003) (Fig. 1A). In univariate generalized linear models, age [β = −0.61 (95% CI −1.01, −0.21) p = 0.00275], sex [β = 14.1 (95% CI 10.0, 18.1), p < 0.001], ethnicity [β = −5.94 (95% CI −10.3, −1.63), p = 0.007] and nuclear sclerosis (NS) grade [β = 10.9 (95% CI 6.62, 15.2), p < 0.001] were significantly associated with post-operative change in BCVA (Table 1, Fig. 1B). Presence of central foveal EZ breaks and MacTel disease stage were not significantly associated with post-operative change in BCVA (Fig. 1B). When age and NS grade were entered into a multivariate generalized linear model, only NS grade [β = 8.99 (95% CI 3.35, 14.6), p = 0.00177] was significantly associated with post-operative change in BCVA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Scatterplot showing best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after cataract surgery. Pre-operative Snellen BCVA is plotted on the x-axis and post-operative Snellen BCVA is plotted on the y-axis. The diagonal line intersecting the origin represents no change in BCVA. Values above the diagonal line represent an increase in visual acuity and vice versa. B Dot and box plots showing post-op gain in ETDRS letters according to (left) nuclear sclerosis grade, (center) absence or presence of central foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) break, and (right) MacTel disease stage

Full size image
Table 1 Gain in ETDRS letters according to patient and ocular characteristics
Full size table

A total of nine out of 20 eyes (45%) achieved post-operative BCVA of better than 20/40 (Table 2). On univariate logistic regression, pre-operative BCVA [OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.02–1.23), p = 0.0131] and presence of central foveal EZ breaks [OR 5.62 × 10–10 (95% CI 2.89 × 10–10–1.09 × 10−9), p < 0.001] were positively and negatively associated with achieving post-operative BCVA of better than 20/40, respectively. When entered into a multivariate logistic regression model, only the presence of central foveal EZ breaks [OR 1.33 × 10–9 (95% CI 5.12 × 10–10–3.43 × 10−9), p < 0.001] was statistically significant, and showed an inverse correlation with achieving post-operative BCVA of better than 20/40.

Table 2 Patient and ocular characteristics of eyes achieving post-op BCVA of better than 20/40 or 20/40 or worse
Full size table

No intra-operative complications were encountered. A total of 6 out of 20 eyes (30%) developed visually-significant posterior capsular opacification that required YAG capsulotomy. Other post-operative complications including pseudophakic cystoid macular edema, did not develop in the post-operative period. Five out of 20 patients had significant vision loss, defined by a decrease in visual acuity of two lines or more (10 or more ETDRS letters), during the follow-up period starting at 16 months post-surgery. On survival analysis, 66.7% of patients did not have significant vision loss (Fig. 2A). The median decrease in visual acuity per year was 0.40 letters (IQR 0–3.05), with a mean of 2.31 letters. On univariate Cox regression, sex [HR 1.33 × 10–8 (95% CI 1.47 × 10–9, 1.2 × 10–7), p < 0.001], disease stage [HR 5.36, (95% CI 2.36, 12.1), p < 0.001] and presence of central foveal EZ breaks [HR 1.67 × 109 (95% CI 3.56 × 108, 7.81 × 109), p < 0.001] were significantly associated with vision loss over time (Fig. 2B, C). When disease stage and the presence of central foveal EZ breaks were entered into a multivariate Cox regression model, both disease stage [HR 2.83, (95% CI 1.12, 7.12), p = 0.027] and presence of central foveal EZ breaks [HR 1.77 × 109 (95% CI 3.86 × 108, 8.11 × 109), p < 0.001] were significantly associated with a shorter time to vision loss. Qualitatively, all eyes with significant vision loss had progression of EZ disruption on OCT, although EZ loss could not be reliably quantified due to the different OCT platforms used in different patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves of vision loss of 2 lines or more (10 or more ETDRS letters) in eyes with MacTel Type 2 after cataract surgery. A Kaplan–Meier curve of all eyes. B Kaplan–Meier curves of eyes with no central foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) break (solid black line) and eyes with central foveal EZ break (dashed grey line). C Kaplan–Meier curves of eyes with MacTel Stage 3 (solid black line), Stage 4 (solid grey line) and Stage 5 (dashed grey line). p-values for univariate Cox regression are shown

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we examined the visual acuity of patients with Macular Telangiectasia (MacTel) Type 2 following cataract surgery. Firstly, we showed that the majority of eyes with MacTel Type 2 had a significant gain in visual acuity (median of 10.5 ETDRS letters) in the early post period following cataract surgery. While not unexpected, the magnitude of improved visual acuity in these eyes correlated with the clinical severity of the nuclear sclerotic cataract. To the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the improvement in visual acuity following cataract surgery in MacTel Type 2 patients.

Secondly, we found that the presence of central foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption on OCT was significantly associated with MacTel Type 2 eyes not achieving a post-operative visual acuity of better than 20/40 in the 2 months following cataract surgery. While the initial clinical staging of MacTel Type 2 by Gass and Blodi [14] focused on the vascular changes, it is now recognized that these vascular changes result from loss of retinal cells such as Muller glia [1,2,3], which manifests as retinal cavitations on OCT. Experimental evidence indicates that oxidative stress, combined with impaired antioxidant pathways (e.g. serine synthesis), induces retinal cell death [19]. Indeed, we have previously shown that mice with hypoxia-induced oxidative stress coupled with impaired serine synthesis had increased cell death and developed retinal cavitations reminiscent of MacTel Type 2 [20]. With MacTel Type 2, retinal cavitation volume correlates with disease progression and precedes EZ loss [21], which presumably correlates with photoreceptor damage or loss [3]. Peto et al. [8] showed that about 76% of MacTel Type 2 patients without initial EZ disruption developed focal EZ loss after 5 years of follow up. To date, EZ loss is the most established surrogate biomarker for visual function in MacTel Type 2 because EZ loss has been associated with loss of retinal sensitivity as measured by microperimetry [5, 6], which precedes a loss in visual acuity [6, 8]. When EZ loss affects the foveal center, visual acuity [8, 9]. This observation is consistent with our finding of post-operative visual acuity of 20/40 or lower being associated with central foveal EZ breaks. These results suggest that assessing central foveal EZ disruption in eyes with MacTel Type 2 prior to undergoing cataract surgery is a valuable prognostic indicator of post-operative visual potential.

Finally, we found that the improved visual acuity following cataract surgery was maintained in the majority (66.7%) of MacTel Type 2 eyes during a median follow-up period of 25.5 months and a mean follow-up of 40.0 months. However, MacTel Type 2 eyes with central foveal EZ disruption on pre-operative OCT were more likely to experience loss in visual acuity of two lines or more (the equivalent of 10 or more ETDRS letters) after the initial improvement following cataract surgery. Conceivably, vision loss in MacTel Type 2 eyes could result from complications arising after cataract surgery. In a Phase II clinical trial of ranibizumab for non-neovascular Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 patients, one participant demonstrated marked increase in vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography and retinal thickness on OCT within 4 weeks of undergoing cataract surgery, which was attributed to surgery-induced pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (Irvine-Gass syndrome) [12]. In our study, we did not observe pseudophakic cystoid macular edema or any other retinal complications from cataract surgery. Rather, vision loss was likely to have resulted from disease progression. In our cohort, 5 out of 20 eyes had significant vision loss of 2 lines or more. The annual loss in visual acuity was positively skewed by a few patients, with a median of 0.40 letters and a mean of 2.31. These figures are slightly higher when compared to the vision loss described in other studies examining the progression of visual acuity loss in MacTel Type 2. The slightly higher rate of vision loss observed in our study could be due to the higher percentage of patients with central foveal EZ breaks at baseline (65%) compared to previous studies. Sallo et al. [5] found a mean annual loss of 0.267 letters, with 12 out of 39 eyes (30.8%) having central foveal EZ breaks. Heeren at el. found a mean annual vision loss of 2.2 letters, although the percentage of patients with central foveal EZ breaks was not reported [22]. Peto et al. [8] found 27% of eyes to have lost two lines or more at 5 years of follow-up and a yearly loss of 1.07 letters, with 372 out of 974 eyes (38%) having central foveal EZ breaks at baseline. We found that central foveal EZ breaks at baseline was significantly associated with a shorter time to vision loss of two lines or more, which is likely due to the progression of the underlying disease process affecting the fovea. Therefore, the higher prevalence of central foveal EZ breaks in our cohort at baseline, rather than cataract surgery, is more like to account for the apparently higher rate of vision loss.

Interestingly, we found that disease severity, as proposed by Gass and Blodi [14], was associated with a shorter time to vision loss of two lines or more after cataract surgery in eyes with in MacTel Type 2 independent of the presence of central foveal EZ breaks. In a previous study by Heeren et al. [6], advanced stages of MacTel Type 2 were associated with the presence and size of an absolute scotoma on microperimetry; the presence of a scotoma was in turn associated with progressive functional decline on microperimetry. The presence of intraretinal clumping on examination, which is a feature of stage 4 disease in the Gass and Blodi staging system [14], is likely to be a less sensitive marker for photoreceptor damage than EZ breaks on OCT and therefore, an indication of more severe photoreceptor loss.

The limitations of our study include its retrospective design and small sample size. However, due to the relative rarity of MacTel Type 2, a prospective study for our study aim would not have been feasible. Another limitation is that we could only qualitatively, and not quantitatively, analyze central foveal EZ breaks due to the different OCT platforms used for collecting images in different patients. Finally, the grading of cataracts was not carried out by standardized photographs but by clinical slit-lamp examination, which could be prone to inter-observer variability. A relative strength of our study is that the patients had their pre-operative evaluation, cataract surgery and post-operative follow up completed at the same institution, which eliminates variations in clinical practice that could exist between different institutions.

Conclusions

We found that the majority of MacTel Type 2 eyes had significant gains in visual acuity following cataract surgery regardless of the underlying MacTel disease severity, as measured by the Gass and Blodi staging system [14] or the presence of central foveal EZ breaks. The gain in visual acuity was correlated with the severity of the cataract determined by clinical slit-lamp examination and was maintained in the majority of patients. However, the presence of central foveal EZ breaks on OCT was correlated with post-operative vision of 20/40 or worse and a shorter time to vision loss following cataract surgery that is likely to be a consequence of disease progression.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to institutional regulations in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BCVA:

Best corrected visual acuity

IQR:

Interquartile range

OR:

Odds ratio

HR:

Hazard ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Powner MB, Gillies MC, Tretiach M, Scott A, Guymer RH, Hageman GS, et al. Perifoveal müller cell depletion in a case of macular telangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(12):2407–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen W, Fruttiger M, Zhu L, Chung SH, Barnett NL, Kirk JK, et al. Conditional Müller cell ablation causes independent neuronal and vascular pathologies in a novel transgenic model. J Neurosci. 2012;32(45):15715–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Powner MB, Gillies MC, Zhu M, Vevis K, Hunyor AP, Fruttiger M. Loss of Müller’s cells and photoreceptors in macular telangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(11):2344–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charbel Issa P, Gillies MC, Chew EY, Bird AC, Heeren TFC, Peto T, et al. Macular telangiectasia type 2. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;1(34):49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sallo FB, Peto T, Egan C, Wolf-Schnurrbusch UEK, Clemons TE, Gillies MC, et al. The IS/OS junction layer in the natural history of type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(12):7889–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heeren TFC, Clemons T, Scholl HPN, Bird AC, Holz FG, Issa PC. Progression of vision loss in macular telangiectasia type 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(6):3905–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Okada M, Robson AG, Egan CA, Sallo FB, Esposti SD, Heeren TFC, et al. Electrophysiological characterization of macular telangiectasia type 2 and structure-function correlation. Retina. 2018;38(Suppl 1):S33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peto T, Heeren TFC, Clemons TE, Sallo FB, Leung I, Chew EY, et al. Correlation of clinical and structural progression with visual acuity loss in macular telangiectasia type 2: MacTel project report No. 6—the MacTel research group. Retina. 2018;38(Suppl1):S8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pauleikhoff D, Bonelli R, Dubis AM, Gunnemann F, Rothaus K, Issa PC, et al. Progression characteristics of ellipsoid zone loss in macular telangiectasia type 2. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 2019;97(7):e998-1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein R, Blodi BA, Meuer SM, Myers CE, Chew EY, Klein BEK. The prevalence of macular telangiectasia type 2 in the Beaver Dam eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(1):55-62.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richter GM, Chung J, Azen SP, Varma R. Prevalence of visually significant cataract and factors associated with unmet need for cataract surgery: Los Angeles latino eye study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2327–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Toy BC, Koo E, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, Chew EY, Wong WT. Treatment of non-neovascular idiopathic macular telangiectasia type 2 with intravitreal ranibizumab: results of a phase ii clinical trial. Retina. 2012;32(5):996–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregori NZ, Feuer W, Rosenfeld PJ. Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements. Retina Phila Pa. 2010;30(7):1046–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gass JDM, Blodi BA. Idiopathic juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis: update of classification and follow-up study. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(10):1536–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tick S, Rossant F, Ghorbel I, Gaudric A, Sahel J-A, Chaumet-Riffaud P, et al. Foveal shape and structure in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thylefors B, Chylack LT Jr, Konyama K, Sasaki K, Sperduto R, Taylor HR, et al. A simplified cataract grading system the WHO cataract grading group. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002;9(2):83–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Inan G, Wang L. PGEE: an R package for analysis of longitudinal data with high-dimensional covariates. R J. 2017;9(1):393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the cox model. New York: Springer; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Scerri TS, Quaglieri A, Cai C, Zernant J, Matsunami N, Baird L, et al. Genome-wide analyses identify common variants associated with macular telangiectasia type 2. Nat Genet. 2017;49(4):559–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heng JS, Rattner A, Stein-O’Brien GL, Winer BL, Jones BW, Vernon HJ, et al. Hypoxia tolerance in the Norrin-deficient retina and the chronically hypoxic brain studied at single-cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(18):9103–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cai CX, Choong J, Farsiu S, Chiu SJ, Chew EY, Jaffe GJ. Retinal cavitations in macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel): longitudinal structure–function correlations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(1):109–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heeren TF, Kitka D, Florea D, Clemons TE, Chew EY, Bird AC, et al. Longitudinal correlation of ellipsoid zone loss and functional loss in macular telangiectasia type 2. Retina. 2018;38(Suppl 1):S20.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been presented as a poster at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting 2021.

Funding

Unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (Wilmer Eye Institute). Dr. Heng received support from the Thomas J. Kelly and Mary L. Kelly Young Scholar Award. Dr. Handa is the Robert Bond Welch Professor. Dr. Handa receives grant funding and royalties from Bayer Pharmaceuticals and grant funding from Clover Therapeutics for unrelated work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA

    Jacob S. Heng

  2. Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA

    Jacob S. Heng

  3. Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 400 N. Broadway, Smith 3015, Baltimore, USA

    Jacob S. Heng, J. Fernando Arevalo & James T. Handa

Authors
  1. Jacob S. Heng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Fernando Arevalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James T. Handa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JSH and JTH contributed to the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and writing of the manuscript. JFA contributed to the data interpretation and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James T. Handa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (Protocol number IRB00151621). Patient consent was not required due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of only anonymized data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heng, J.S., Arevalo, J.F. & Handa, J.T. Visual acuity after cataract surgery in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 Stage 3 to 5. Int J Retin Vitr 8, 38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00386-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-022-00386-0

Keywords

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous

ISSN: 2056-9920

Contact us