Skip to main content

Color vision restrictions for medical school admission: a discussion on regulations in ASEAN countries compared to countries across the world


Color vision deficiency impairs one’s ability to perceive and discriminate colors. Color-deficient individuals may face discrimination in various occupations, particularly in medical school admissions. This discussion seeks to compare the existing color vision requirements for entry to medical school in Southeast Asian countries as compared to countries across the world. Following this, we explore the published evidence in this field, to provide recommendations for future guidelines that will maximize the occupational opportunities for color-deficient individuals.


Color vision deficiency can be congenital or acquired. Males (about 8%) are more commonly affected for the former as compared to their female counterparts (0.4%) [26]. Acquired causes can be a result of different etiologies including inflammatory diseases, medication toxicity, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, or neurological causes like tumor or stroke [19].

Color vision deficiency is a spectrum of disease, hence the severity and impact on function vary between individuals. Normal individuals or normal trichromats have functioning cone photopigments in all three classes. For anomalous trichromats, one of the three cone photopigments has an abnormal absorption spectrum— tritanomaly, deuteranomaly and protanomaly for blue, green, or red photopigment anomaly respectively. For dichromats, one of the three cone photopigments is absent—tritanopia, deuteranopia and protanopia for absent blue, green or red photopigment respectively. Monochromats possess one or no functional cone photopigment [3].

Some professions rely on discrimination of colors more than others [11]. It has been demonstrated that color-deficient individuals face more difficulties in color-dependent tasks such as identifying traffic signal controls [48] and color-coded equipment [44]. In particular, it is not surprising for the medical profession to demand astute color discrimination from its physicians [13, 47]. Furthermore, as medical management of every patient is guided by clinical judgment, this has significant safety implications to the community at large.

To our knowledge, there has been limited literature published in the areas of color vision deficiency and medical school admissions originating from Southeast Asia. Therefore, in this study, we aim to outline the existing requirements for admission to medical schools among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) ten member countries, namely Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam; as compared to countries across the world. We then explore the existing evidence on the impact of color vision deficiency on medical practice, to explore further recommendations on current requirements.

Existing regulations for medical school admissions

Color vision deficiency is not a criterion for rejection to study or practice medicine in most countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom [13]. Historically, Japan had the most restrictive policy, with 55.8% of medical universities excluding individuals with deficient color vision in 1986. This dropped to 2.3% with efforts by the Japanese Ophthalmologists Association in 1992, subsequently dropped after campaigning efforts by ophthalmologist/activist Yasuyo Takayanagi [16, 44]. Takyanagi demonstrated that individuals who did not pass mandatory Ishihara tests were still able to execute color-coded tasks, in a study where participants were able to connect color cords without error [45]. Screening of color vision deficiency is only practiced at one university in the United Kingdom, where it is a part of the Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern Ireland routine medical examinations, but normal color vision is not a criterion for entry [14, 22]. Similarly, the Medical Council of India followed the recommendations by the Supreme Court to drop restrictions on applicants with color vision deficiency—at the stage of admission, completion of study, and registration as a medical practitioner—ending its decades-old practice [46].

Among the ten ASEAN countries discussed (Table 1), most countries (seven out of ten) did not have color vision requirements for medical school admissions. Only Indonesia and Malaysia excluded medical school applicants with any color vision impairment. In particular, color vision deficiency is screened in Myanmar and Thailand, not as a criterion for medical school entry, but instead to make the individual aware of their color vision deficiency. In countries where color vision was tested, the Ishihara test plates were used.

Table 1 Color vision requirements for medical school admissions in ASEAN countries [42]

Effect of color vision deficiency on medical practice

Difficulties in medical practice that have been identified amongst color-deficient doctors [37] mainly involved the diagnostic process. These challenges included interpretation of physical signs in clinical examination [e.g. skin [1]—cyanosis (bluish color to the skin from low oxygen), jaundice (yellowish color to the skin from the build up of toxins), erythema (redness of the skin); bodily fluids [6, 32]—urine, feces, vomitus], tests/instruments [8, 23, 30, 35] (e.g. test strips, charts, slides, otoscope/ophthalmoscope). In particular, these difficulties may be accentuated in situations when observed signs are pivotal (i.e. next course of action depends solely on the interpretation of color); working conditions such as poor lighting; or general practitioners who function alone where second opinions are not readily available [37].

Furthermore, misinterpretation in some instances may potentially be dangerous—one study reported that feeding down incorrectly placed nasogastric tubes resulted in eleven deaths in a 2 years [27]. Checking for correct placement of nasogastric tubes involves interpreting pH indicator colored test strips of aspirates, where color-deficient doctors may potentially make errors. Otherwise, there is no clear evidence to show the association with increased medical errors.

However, clinical medicine encompasses interpretation of all factors in the diagnostic process, that need not rely solely on color discrimination. In most clinical situations, with increasing experience, various other factors including history taking and targeted physical examination are involved in reaching a diagnosis and formulating a management plan [14]. Hence, with proper training most doctors with color vision deficiency are still able to function effectively.

Interestingly, a sizeable proportion of color-deficient individuals are unaware of their deficiency [2, 35, 37, 39]. As a result, this group of doctors may only reactively learn from avoidable mistakes, whereas a preferable strategy in an individual who is aware of their color deficiency, is to pre-empt specific difficulties and take active steps to minimize errors. On the other hand, even those who are aware of their color deficiency may often be unaware of its extent [37, 38]; and some may be more anxious about the risk of error or lack confidence in practice which may instead compromise patient care [14, 25].

Hence, color vision testing at the point of admission to medical school may allow potential doctors with color vision deficiency to make informed decisions on whether to pursue a future in the medical profession. A study by Chan et al. looked at the chronological impact on development and difficulties faced by individuals with color vision deficiency from playschool age to school age and adulthood [10]. 77% of color-deficient individuals only knew about their condition after formal color vision testing in their later years, where they recounted retrospectively the difficulties faced in their growing years [43]. This suggests a role for early screening for color vision deficiency to increase awareness [18].

Moving forward

Color-deficient individuals should not be denied medical school admission or a practicing medical license as adaptive compensatory strategies can be employed to overcome the difficulties faced. Studies have emphasized the role of pre-entry testing of color vision, not as a criterion for entry, but to raise awareness amongst applicants on their deficiency and acknowledge the potential challenges [7, 12, 13]. These studies have also highlighted the role of institutions to provide appropriate counselling on compensatory mechanisms and facilitate informed career choices in particular to medicine [35, 36, 38, 40, 43]. For instance, doctors with abnormal color vision can minimize errors by their choice of specialty [36], utilizing other sources of information that are not color-dependent, and optimizing observation conditions like ambient lighting brightness [38]. For example, Rubin et al. demonstrated the use of grayscale copies to remove confusing stain colors and accentuate the contrast in texture of tissues to ease interpretation of histology slides [34]. More recently, ongoing efforts include digitalizing pathology slides and optimizing them via personalizing color maps for individual pathologists’ visual systems [29]. With technological advancements in the medical field, the use of optical aids, advanced imaging techniques, artificial intelligence with deep learning algorithms in clinical practice to strengthen diagnostic assessment may further reduce the reliance on color vision in clinical examination [9, 15, 17, 24].

However, there is limited published evidence on specific advice for color-deficient individuals to adopt in the field of clinical practice. Raynor et al. surveyed on 33 UK medical schools and 154 acute trusts found that 16.7% screened for color vision deficiency and 50% made adaptations for these students. However, the support given was focused on examinations (e.g. extra time given to candidates during examinations) but does not improve obstacles faced in real-life clinical practice [31].

Evaluation of current practice also calls for better standardization of color vision tests. Amongst the wide range of color vision tests, there lacks existing evidence to support which test is the most accurate and practical. Despite the anomaloscope’s high sensitivity and specificity [4], often regarded as the gold standard [20, 28, 41], it is expensive and technically challenging to use hence limiting its feasibility for routine use. On the other hand, commonly used tests like the Ishihara pseudoisochromatic test have been reported to have poor correlation with the type and severity of color vision deficiency [3, 33]. This once again limits its use in reflecting the impact of color vision deficiency on the individual’s function.

There have been new systems proposed to quantify the severity of color vision deficiency and identify what can be considered safe or functional based on the requirements of specific color vision tasks in visually demanding occupations. For example, color vision categories proposed by Barbur et al. range from ‘Supernormal’ trichromatic color vision (CV0), ‘Normal’ trichromatic color vision (CV1), ‘Functionally normal’ trichromatic color vision (CV2), ‘Safe’ trichromatic color vision (CV3), ‘Poor’ red-green color vision (CV4) and ‘Severe red-green color deficiency (CV5); and ‘Supernormal’, ‘Normal’ and ‘Acquired color deficiency’ for yellow-blue color vision deficiency. 22% of deutans and 1% of protans were classified as ‘Safe’ or ‘Functionally normal’ under this system [5]. Similarly, the Color Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) test was developed to establish the minimum requirements to carry out the most safety–critical task. The CAD test has been adopted in other fields like the United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority for professional aviation pilots [5] and the Transport for London for underground train captains [21], where about one-third of applicants, who would otherwise be rejected under conventional tests, were now considered safe. These efforts highlight the need to further validate the use of these tests to redefine color vision requirements in the medical field and its sub-specialties, to potentially minimize unnecessary discrimination against color-deficient individuals who can fulfill these tasks safely.


Overall, the current evidence does not support excluding color-deficient individuals from practicing medicine. However, while many studies have emphasized the need for screening to increase awareness, there currently lacks evidence-based, deficiency-specific advice for color-deficient individuals who may potentially experience difficulties. Moreover, it may be of value to further study the different demands of color vision in specific sub-specialities in medical or surgical practice to provide color-deficient individuals with better early career advice. Hence, this suggests, that more research is required in these areas to derive updated standardized guidelines and tangible evidence-based advice for medical schools admissions.

Availability of data and materials

No data were generated or analyzed in the presented research.


  1. Ahlenstiel H. Red-green blindness as a personal experience. Kodak Research Library, 1951.

  2. Ali ML. Color vision deficiency in the medical and allied occupations. J Univ Med Dental College, 2012;3(1): 1–5.

  3. Barbur JL, Rodriguez-Carmona M. Colour vision requirements in visually demanding occupations. Br Med Bull. 2017;122(1):51–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birch J. Diagnosis of defective colour vision using the Nagel Anomaloscope. In: Verriest, G. (ed.), Colour Vision Deficiencies VI, Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 33: 231–235. The Hague: Dr W. Junk. 1982.

  5. Birch J, Rodríguez-Carmona M. Occupational color vision standards: new prospects. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014;31(4):A55–9. (PMID: 24695202).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell JL, Griffin L, Spalding JA, Mir FA. The effect of abnormal colour vision on the ability to identify and outline coloured clinical signs and to count stained bacilli in sputum. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88:376–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell JL, Spalding AJ, Mir FA, Birch J. Doctors and the assessment of clinical photographs—does color blindness matter? Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:459–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell JL, Spalding JA, Mir FA, Birch J. Doctors and the assessment of blood glucose testing sticks: does colour blindness matter? Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:393–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan S, Reddy V, Myers B, Thibodeaux Q, Brownstone N, Liao W. Machine learning in dermatology: current applications, opportunities, and limitations. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020;10(3):365–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan XB, Goh SM, Tan NC. Subjects with colour vision deficiency in the community: what do primary care physicians need to know? Asia Pac Fam Med. 2014;13(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cumberland P, Rahi JS, Peckham CS. Impact of congenital colour vision defects on occupation. Arch. Dis. Childh. 2005 Sep 1;90(9):906–8.

  12. Dhingra R, Rohatgi J, Dhaliwal U. Preparing medical students with congenital colour vision deficiency for safe practice. Natl Med J India. 2017;30:30–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dohvoma VA, EbanaMvogo SR, Kagmeni G. Color vision deficiency among biomedical students: a cross-sectional study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1121–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farag S. Blind spots in medical students with color vision deficiency. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1875–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farris AB, Vizcarra J, Amgad M, Cooper LAD, Gutman D, Hogan J. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic computational pathology: an introduction with renal allograft examples. Histopathology. 2020.

  16. Gordenker A. Color blind school kids can see clearly now. The Japan Times. 2003. Accessed on 1 August 2020. Available at:

  17. Gunasekeran DV, Wong TY. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology in 2020: a technology on the cusp for translation and implementation. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020;9:61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrington S, Davison PA, O'dwyer V. Prevalence of colour vision deficiency in the Republic of Ireland school children and associated socio-demographic factors. Clin Exp Optom. 2021 Jan;104(1):48–55. PMID: 32285548.

  19. Hasrod N, Rubin A. Defects of colour vision: a review of congenital and acquired colour vision deficiencies. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2016;75(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jägle H, Pirzer M, Sharpe LT. The Nagel anomaloscope: its calibration and recommendations for diagnosis and research. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(1):26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ballard J. Color vision safety on track. Safer and fairer color vision testing at London Underground. Occupational Health at Work. 2013; 10(1): 20–23. Accessed on 10 July 2022. Available at:

  22. Johnston W, Merrett JD. Further observations on routine medical examinations of university entrants in Northern Ireland. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1962;16(2):76–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koningsberger JC, van Norren D, van Niel JC, Dekker W. Does color vision deficiency in the endoscopist influence the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis? An anonymous study with Dutch gastrointestinal endoscopists. Endoscopy. 1994;26:549–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li JO, Liu H, Ting DSJ, Jeon S, Chan RVP, Kim JE, Sim DA, Thomas PBM, Lin H, Chen Y, Sakomoto T, Loewenstein A, Lam DSC, Pasquale LR, Wong TY, Lam LA, Ting DSW. Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a global perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2020;100900.

  25. Mashige KP. Impact of congenital color vision defect on color-related tasks among school children in Durban, South Africa. Clin Optometry. 2019;11:97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Montgomery G. Color blindness: More prevalent among males. A report from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. 2003. Accessed on 1 August 2020. Available at:

  27. National Patient Safety Agency. Patient safety alert: reducing the harm caused by misplaced nasogastric feeding tubes. 2005.

  28. National Research Council (US) Committee on Vision. Procedures for Testing Color Vision: Report of Working Group 41. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), Chapter 3, Color vision tests. 1981.

  29. Nelson B. Color blindness in the medical workplace: researchers are debating the role of color in disciplines such as pathology and working toward broader solutions to address color vision deficiencies among medical personnel. Cancer Cytopathol. 2019;127(4):209–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Poole CJM, Hill DJ, Christie JL, Birch J. Deficient colour vision and interpretation of histopathology slides: a cross sectional study. BMJ. 1997;315:1279–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Raynor NJ, Hallam G, Hynes NK, Molloy BT. Blind to the risk: an analysis into the guidance offered to doctors and medical students with colour vision deficiency. Eye. 2019;33(12):1877–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Riess MJ, Labowitz DA, Forman S, Wormser GP. Impact of colour blindness on the recognition of blood in body fluids. Arch Inter Med. 2001;161:461–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodriguez-Carmona M, O'Neill-Biba M, Barbur JL. Assessing the severity of color vision loss with implications for aviation and other occupational environments. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Jan;83(1):19–29. PMID: 22272512.

  34. Rubin LR, Lackey WL, Kennedy FA, Stephenson RB. Using color and grayscale images to teach histology to color-deficient medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(2):84–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spalding JA. Colour vision deficiency in the medical profession. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(443):469–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Spalding JA. Doctors with Daltonism and the implications for counselling. Optom Today. 2002;42:23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Spalding JA. Confessions of a colour blind physician. Clin Exp Optom. 2004;87(4–5):344–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spalding JA, Cole BL, Mir FA. Advice for medical students and practitioners with colour vision deficiency: a website resource. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93(1):39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Spalding JA. Doctors with inherited colour vision deficiency: their difficulties in clinical work. In: Cavonius CR. Colour Vision Deficiency XII. Proceedings of the International Research Group for Colour Vision Deficiency 1995, Dortrecht. Kluwer Academic, 1997;483–489.

  40. Spalding JA. Medical students and congenital colour vision deficiency: unnoticed problems and the case for screening. Occup Med. 1999;49:247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Squire TJ, Rodriguez-Carmona M, Evans AD, Barbur JL. Color vision tests for aviation: comparison of the anomaloscope and three lantern types. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(5):421–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Statement for color vision deficiency and driving and medical school admission in ASEAN countries. 2018.

  43. Steward SM, Cole BL. What do colour vision defectives say about everyday tasks? Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:288–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Takayanagi Y, Miyao M. Mandatory color defective examinations in Japanese schools, and many restrictions against color defective people. Arch Public Heal. 1993;51:529–33.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Takayanagi Y. Research on the color perception of color defective people in the current society. J Jap Ophthalmol. 1989;60:99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  46. The indHindu. SC directs admission of two colour-blind students in MBBS. 2017. Accessed on 1 August 2020. Available at:

  47. Thomas PB, Nesaratnam N, Chaudhuri-Vayalambrone P, Mollon JD. Color vision deficiency among doctors: can we make useful adaptations to the color codes used in the clinical environment?. J Patient Safety. 2019.

  48. Watson DB. Lack of international uniformity in assessing color vision deficiency in professional pilots. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014;85(2):148–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the Statement from the 2018 Color Vision Symposium made on color vision deficiency and medical school admission by the panel of color vision specialists from the ten ASEAN member countries. This included Dr Warapat Wongsawad, Dr Helena Hurairah, Dr Marie Joan V. Loy, Dr Wah Wah Lwin, Dr Nor Ain Mohd Rawi, Dr Mohamad Sidik, Dr Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Dr Anna Cheng Sim Tan, as well as the additional members of the AOS color vision consortium Dr. Nguyen Duc Doanh and Dr. Khamkhoune Holanouphab.


No funding was received for this discussion paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ACST formulated and led the direction of the article. PS and ACST contributed to the 2018 Color Vision Symposium as representatives of the ASEAN countries. TFT led the literature search and oversaw manuscript writing and revisions with ACST, AG, PS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna C. S. Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate and for publication

No data involving human participants or data.

Consent for publication

No data involving human participants or data.

Competing interests

Dr Anna Tan is a consultant and speaker for Bayer, Novartis, Allergan, Nidek and Zeiss. She receives grant funding from Zeiss, Novartis and Nidek. No funding was provided for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, T.F., Grzybowski, A., Ruamviboonsuk, P. et al. Color vision restrictions for medical school admission: a discussion on regulations in ASEAN countries compared to countries across the world. Int J Retin Vitr 9, 5 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Color vision
  • Medical school
  • Regulations