Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Cataract progression after primary pars plana vitrectomy for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in young adults

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous volume 10, Article number: 19 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Scleral buckling is typically implemented to repair rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) in young patients. Therefore, there is limited data on post-pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) cataract formation in this cohort. We report the rates and risk factors of cataract progression after PPV for RRD repair in young eyes.

Methods

Retrospective single-center cohort study. Medical records of patients between the ages of 15 to 45 undergoing PPV for uncomplicated RRD between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed.

Results

Twenty-eight eyes from 26 patients met inclusion criteria. Cataracts developed in 20/28 (71%) eyes after PPV. After PPV, nuclear sclerotic cataract (NSC) rates were higher in patients above 35 (65%) compared to below 35 years (18%) (p = 0.024). Cataracts developed more frequently after macula-off RRDs (88%) compared to macula-on RRDs (50%) (p = 0.044) with NSC more common in macula-off detachments (p = 0.020). At postoperative month 2, all eyes with C3F8 gas developed cataracts compared to 59% of eyes with no gas (p = 0.040).

Conclusions

Cataract formation was common and frequent after PPV. After PPV, young eyes and macula-on detachments developed cataracts less frequently than older eyes and macula-off detachments. If appropriate, a shorter acting gas tamponade should be considered in young eyes to minimize cataract formation.

Background

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) occur in a bimodal distribution affecting the elderly as well as younger, typically myopic patients [1]. Various repair modalities exist including pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB), and pneumatic retinopexy. PPV has been shown to increase the rate of nuclear sclerotic cataracts (NSC) and posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSC) formation with minimal lens changes seen after SB. Increased oxygen tension after vitreous removal, prolonged exposure to saline solution during PPV, use of higher purity and longer longevity gases, direct trauma to the lens, and larger vitrectomy gauges have been proposed as causes of increased cataract formation after PPV; however, the mechanism is still unclear [2, 3]. Analysis on post-PPV cataract formation is limited in young eyes as SB is usually preferred in this group [4,5,6]. At our institution, some vitreoretinal surgeons prefer PPV over SB in this age group. While prior studies have evaluated the rates and risk factors associated with cataract progression after PPV in all ages, we focus our analysis on young patients to determine the rates of and risk factors for cataract progression.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients ages 15 to 45 years old with no prior retinal surgery undergoing PPV for RRD repair between 2014 and 2020 at Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, USA. Primary PPV was chosen for these patients if they had a pre-operative PVD or if the vitreoretinal surgeon felt that they could induce a PVD intraoperatively. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Henry Ford Health System Institutional Review Board. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, written informed consent was not required. Exclusion criteria included pseudophakic or aphakic eyes, eyes with less than 3 months of follow-up, eyes requiring lensectomy at the time of initial RRD repair, and combined detachments (diabetic, inflammatory, and infectious etiologies). Only eyes undergoing one surgery for RRD repair were primarily analyzed to avoid the effects of reoperations on cataract formation. Eyes with mild preoperative cataracts were included in the analysis.

Primary outcomes of this study include cataract formation rates after RRD repair and time to cataract extraction from initial PPV. Cataract formation was recorded based on type: NSC, PSC, and cortical. Cataract severity was recorded pre-operatively, at post-operative month 1 (POM1), post-operative month 3 (POM3), and post-operative year 1 (POY1). Cataract grading was based on the Lens Opacities Classification System, version II (LOCS II) scale of 1–4 (with 4 being the worst) [7]. Secondary outcomes include changes in pre- and post-cataract surgery visual acuity (VA) and correlations between age, preoperative refraction, posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) presence, macula status, surgical time and cataract development or progression. As most retinal detachments have stable VA 3–6 months after repair, postoperative month 3 was selected to minimize effects of intraocular gas and postoperative cataracts on VA in our analysis [8].

Myopia is defined as a refraction between − 6.0 and 0 diopters (D). High myopia is defined as a refraction greater than − 6.0 D. Surgical time was used was a surrogate for saline infusion time during PPV.

Fisher’s exact test was performed for categorical covariates and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for numeric covariates. All analyses were performed using RStudio statistical software (RStudio, Boston, Massachusetts, USA).

Results

Twenty-eight eyes (26 patients) undergoing PPV were included in this study. Initial PPV was performed by one of three vitreoretinal surgeons. The average age at PPV was 35.39 ± 8.26 years with 20/28 (71%) female. Refraction was available for 23/28 (82%) eyes, of which 8/23 (35%) and 11/23 (48%) were myopic and highly myopic, respectively. One patient (1 eye) had a diagnosis of Wagner-Stickler Syndrome and 2 patients (3 eyes) had type 2 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy. A posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was present in 18/28 (64%) eyes with 16/28 (57%) eyes presenting with a macula-off detachment. The crystalline lens was clear in all but one eye, which had a mild cataract. Standard 23-gauge vitrectomy was performed in all vitrectomized eyes. Perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas was used in all but one vitrectomized eye where sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas was used instead. There were no documented lens touch with instrumentation during PPV. The average surgical time was 69 ± 27 min. Average follow-up length was 859 ± 800 days with all retinas attached at last follow-up. One eye had pre-operative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and no eyes developed PVR after PPV. No eyes were enucleated.

Cataracts developed in 20/28 (71%) eyes after PPV with 17/28 (61%) developing within 1 year. NSC, PSC, and cortical cataracts developed in 13/28 (46%), 12/28 (43%), and 2/28 (7%) eyes, respectively, after PPV. Average cataract grading at each post-operative visit is presented in Table 1. The average NSC and PSC grading increased in PPV eyes through 1 year. NSC grading at POM1 (p = 0.021), POM3 (p = 0.011), and POY1 (p = 0.017) were significantly greater compared to pre-operative NSC grading. However, PSC grading at POM1 (p = 0.021), POM3 (p = 0.005), but not POY1 (p = 0.079) were significantly greater compared to pre-operative PSC grading. On average, cataracts developed 180 ± 308 days after PPV. Eleven (39%) eyes required cataract extraction, which occurred 375 ± 212 days after PPV. The average age at PPV of eyes requiring cataract extraction was 38.27 ± 8.56 years compared to 33.52 ± 7.74 years of eyes not requiring cataract extraction after PPV (p = 0.085).

Table 1 Average cataract grading after pars plana vitrectomy
Full size table

VA changes over time are presented in Fig. 1. After PPV, average VA improved to 20/50 from 20/100 (p = 0.513). There was a slight decrease in average VA from 20/50 to 20/60 when comparing three months after PPV to before cataract extraction (p = 0.856). The average time to cataract extraction was 375 days (range: 109–772) after PPV with 6/11 (55%) extractions occurring within 1 year of PPV. Significant VA gains were seen after cataract surgery with an improvement from 20/60 to 20/25 at the last recorded visit (p = 0.006).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Visual Acuity (VA) Changes after Intervention. After retinal reattachment, there was no significant improvement in VA compared to before PPV (p = 0.513). There was a slight decrease in VA between POM3 and pre-CS (p = 0.856). VA significantly improved after cataract surgery compared to before cataract surgery (p = 0.006). *Denotes statistical significance between last recorded VA and pre-cataract surgery VA in eyes undergoing PPV. Abbreviations: CS, cataract surgery; POM3, postoperative month 3; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy

Full size image

Cataracts developed in 7/11 (64%) eyes in patients below 35 years compared to 13/17 (76%) of eyes in patients above 35 years (p = 0.672) (Table 2). Patients above 35 years developed NSC (11/17, 65%) more frequently than patients below 35 years (2/11, 18%) (p = 0.024). However, patients below 35 years developed PSC at similar rates (6/11, 54%) compared to patients above 35 years (7/17, 41%) (p = 0.700). Of eyes developing cataracts, 3/7 (43%) eyes below 35 years and 8/13 (62%) above 35 years required cataract extraction (p = 0.624). Cataracts also developed sooner in patients over 35 years (110 ± 147 days) compared to under 35 years (300 ± 467 days) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.140).

Table 2 Risk factors for cataract progression after PPV
Full size table

Cataracts developed at higher rates after macula-off RRDs (14/16, 88%) compared to macula-on RRDs (6/12, 50%) (p = 0.044) (Table 2). Specifically, NSC developed more frequently in macula-off detachments (12/16, 75%) compared to macula-on detachments (3/12, 25%) (p = 0.020). There was no significant difference in PSC rates between macula-on and macula-off RRDs (p = 0.136). Cataracts also developed sooner after macula-off RRD (114 ± 140 days) compared to macula-on RRD (324 ± 507 days) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.412).

Eyes developing cataracts had an increased postoperative gas fill at all time points compared to eyes without cataracts; however, this difference was not statistically significant at any time point (Table 3). Cataracts developed in 8/8 (100%) eyes with residual C3F8 at postoperative month 2 compared to only 11/18 (61%) eyes without residual C3F8 at postoperative month 2 (p = 0.047). The eye with an SF6 gas tamponade did not develop a cataract.

Table 3 Post-PPV C3F8 Fill
Full size table

Other risk factors for cataract development, such as myopic status, PVD presence, and surgical time was not associated with increased cataract formation rates or increased time to cataract formation (Table 2). Myopic eyes developed NSC and PSC at similar rates of 5/8 (63%) and 4/8 (50%) compared to highly myopic eyes with rates of 5/11 (45%) and 4/11 (36%), respectively (p = 0.645 and 0.658). Of eyes with a preoperative PVD, 14/18 (78%) developed cataracts compared to 6/10 (60%) eyes without preoperative PVD (p = 0.4). PSC and NSC occurred at similar rates in eyes with a PVD (56% and 50%, respectively) compared to eyes without a PVD (40% each) (p = 0.706 and 0.695). Surgical time was not associated with increased cataract formation (p = 1.000). While NSC and PSC occurred more frequently in PPV taking over 60 min (53% and 43%) compared to below 60 min (38% and 38%), there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.476 and 0.712). While there were no documented cases of instrument-lens touch, in eyes that may have required crossing the anatomic midline with instrumentation to treat the breaks, 11/16 (69%) developed cataracts. In eyes that did not require crossing the anatomic midline with instrumentation to treat the breaks, 9/12 (75%) developed cataracts (p = 1.00). Additionally, intraoperative use of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) to stain the posterior hyaloid did not result in increased cataract formation. When IVT was used, 6/10 (60%) of eyes developed cataracts compared to 14/18 (78%) when IVT was not used (p = 0.400). PSC occurred in 4/10 (40%) and 8/18 (44%) eyes with and without IVT use, respectively (p = 1.00). NSC occurred less frequently when IVT was used 2/10 (20%) compared to when IVT was used 11/18 (61%), but was not statistically significant (p = 0.055).

Univariate logistic regression analysis is presented in Table 4; Fig. 2. Similar to the non-parametric analysis above, regression analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between macula status and overall cataract formation as well as age and NSC formation. Regression analysis did not reveal a significant association between other risk factors and cataract formation.

Table 4 Odds Ratios of Risk Factors Associated with Cataract Formation after PPV.
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Cataract Formation after PPV. *Denotes statistically significant odds ratio. Abbreviations: PVD, posterior vitreous detachment; NSC, nuclear sclerosis cataract; PSC; posterior subcapsular cataract

Full size image

Discussion

Oftentimes, surgical repair of RRD is surgeon dependent based on comfort, training, and experience [9]. Typically, a scleral buckle is preferred for younger patients, but as we have discussed in prior works, PPV for RRD repair has excellent outcomes for patients between 35 and 45 years of age [10,11,12]. Specifically, if a PVD was present prior to PPV, single surgery success rate was 87% compared to 65% without a pre-operative PVD in younger eyes [12]. In our current study, a PVD was present in 64% of eyes, but based on surgeon preference, PPV was chosen for repair in these eyes with all eyes achieving single surgery anatomic success. However, cataract formation is a well-known risk after PPV, which is significant in younger patients due to their ability to accommodate compared to older patients. Prior studies have analyzed cataract progression after retinal surgery, but only few have specifically focused on young patients or have included other pathologies such as diabetic tractional detachments and infectious and inflammatory conditions, which are inherently cataractogenic [2, 3, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The primary purpose of this study was to analyze the rates and risk factors of cataract progression after PPV for uncomplicated RRD in healthy eyes between 15 and 45 years of age.

Within 1 year after PPV, 61% of eyes developed cataracts, which is consistent with rates reported in the literature [18]. These cataract formation rates are overall higher than the reported rates after SB alone of 24–46% [2, 20, 21]. Prior studies have demonstrated that PSC are more likely to occur after PPV in young patients, whereas NSC are most likely to occur after PPV in older patients [2, 16,17,18]. In our study of younger patients, NSC and PSC occurred at similar rates after PPV at 46% and 43%, respectively. While our PSC rates were similar to that reported in the literature for young eyes, our NSC rate of 46% demonstrates an interesting trend. Patients below 35 years were significantly less likely to NSC compared to patients between 35 and 45 years. This finding somewhat supports Melberg and Thomas who found minimal NSC progression in patients below 50; however, it may actually be that patients below 35 years who tend to have minimal NSC development after PPV [13]. It is possible that a younger age may be protective against NSC formation after PPV. However, when comparing all forms of cataracts, there was no significant difference in cataract formation rates in patients above and below 35 years.

Prior studies have analyzed risk factors associated with cataract progression after PPV, including refractive status, vitreous status, macula status, and surgical time [2, 3]. In our study, there was increased cataract formation after macula-off RRDs compared to macula-on RRDs. A higher rate of NSC in macula-off RRDs accounted for this difference as PSC rates were similar after both macula-on and macula-off RRDs. While this finding is difficult to explain, we suspect that this is likely due to an increased oxygen tension posterior to the lens, which has been associated with increased NSC formation [22, 23]. Prior studies have established the relationship between increased vitreous liquefaction and NSC formation as oxygen from the retinal circulation is better able to diffuse through a liquid vitreous [24]. Similarly, PPV reduces the normal oxygen gradient within the eye through multiple mechanisms including decreased vitreous oxygen consumption and increased oxygen diffusion throughout the vitreous cavity, and exposes the lens to higher oxygen concentrations [22, 25]. As the origin of subretinal fluid in a RRD is liquified vitreous, it is possible that the vitreous is more liquefied in macula-off detachments as more subretinal fluid is necessary to advance a peripheral detachment towards the macula [26]. Therefore, a thorough core and peripheral vitrectomy is able to be performed in macula-off RRDs as there is less vitreous gel. Oxygen tension posterior to the lens may be increased after a thorough vitrectomy in these cases. However, in macula-on RRDs, it is more difficult to perform a thorough vitrectomy especially in younger patients with an adherent vitreous. This may ultimately reduce oxygen tension posterior the lens due to less oxygen diffusion from the retina as well as increased vitreous oxygen consumption, and thus less cataract formation. Interestingly, in eyes with intact anterior vitreous after PPV had a significantly reduced rate of cataract formation compared to eyes without an intact anterior vitreous, which may further support this theory [27]. Additionally, Bellucci et al. reported increased cataract surgery rates in macula-off RRDs after PPV in all ages, which may also support our findings [14].

Prior studies have demonstrated an increased risk of cataract development with C3F8 compared to SF6, but these findings were not statistically significant [13, 28,29,30,31]. In our study, all but one patient had a C3F8 gas tamponade. SF6 gas lasts approximately 2–4 weeks in the eye, whereas C3F8 lasts approximately 2 months within the eye [32]. While eyes developing cataracts had a higher C3F8 gas fill at all time points after RRD repair up to postoperative month 2, the difference between the gas levels at these time points were not significantly different. However, all eyes with C3F8 gas at postoperative month 2 developed cataracts compared to only 59% of eyes without any residual C3F8 at postoperative month 2. While multiple factors are responsible for gas longevity including axial length, initial gas fill, and gas concentration, a shorter acting gas is likely to be less cataractogenic and should be considered in younger eyes but needs to be balanced by the higher rates of PVR and lower rates of single surgery success in this group [12, 33]. Ultimately, the decision of gas tamponade should be made to optimize primary surgical repair of RRD.

We found no other association of risk factors of cataract progression after RRD repair in young eyes. While Pan et al. demonstrated an association between myopia and NSC and an increased PSC rate in highly myopic patients, we did not find a similar trend in our study [34]. It has also been theorized that prolonged PPV time may predispose patients to cataract development due to increased exposure of the lens to saline solution, which was not demonstrated in our study and prior works [19, 35]. The lower rates of cataracts in eyes with intraoperative IVT use is difficult to explain as intraocular steroids has been shown to increase cataract formation [36,37,38]. These rates may be more attributable to the small sample sizes in each group and not a true trend after intraoperative IVT use.

The limitations of this study are its small sample size and retrospective nature. Given that this is a retrospective study, cataract grading was obtained from chart review. While majority of ophthalmologists utilize the Lens Opacities Classification System, version II (LOCS II) scale of 1–4, to grade cataracts there is also a subjective component that is difficult to standardize in a retrospective study [7]. To reduce inter-grader discrepancies, cataract grading was obtained from vitreoretinal surgeons’ documented examinations when available, but in some cases was obtained from other ophthalmologists’ examinations if grading was not available or documented by a vitreoretinal surgeon. Another limitation includes a lack of fellow eye analysis. However, as most of our cohort are young and healthy, we do not expect significant cataract progression in the fellow eye. Additionally, a longer-term follow-up may also reveal higher rates of cataract formation as they cataracts develop and progress slowly in younger patients [16].

Conclusion

In conclusion, cataract formation was common after PPV in young patients after RRD repair with the majority of cataracts developing within 1 year of RRD repair. While our results should be interpreted with caution, our study suggests that PPV for patients below 35 years of age or macula-on RRDs may have a decreased risk for NSC formation and may be a reasonable approach for repair; however, we cannot make this statement definitively due to the sample size of this study. A shorter acting gas, such as SF6, should be considered in younger eyes if appropriate based on the anatomical location of retinal breaks and percentage of retinal detachment. Further prospective studies or big-data retrospective studies should be performed to better assess these risk factors for cataract formation after retinal procedures in young patients.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, Campbell H, Singh J. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol Jun. 2010;94(6):678–84. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.157727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng H, Adelman RA. Cataract formation following vitreoretinal procedures. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1957–65. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.S68661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson JT. The role of patient age and intraocular gas use in cataract progression after vitrectomy for macular holes and epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol Feb. 2004;137(2):250–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reeves MG, Pershing S, Afshar AR. Choice of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair method in US commercially insured and Medicare Advantage Patients, 2003–2016. Am J Ophthalmol Dec. 2018;196:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves MG, Afshar AR. The relative impact of patient, physician, and Geographic factors on variation in primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Management. Ophthalmol Jan. 2020;127(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaal S, Sherman MP, Barr CC, Kaplan HJ. Primary retinal detachment repair: comparison of 1-year outcomes of four surgical techniques. Retina Sep. 2011;31(8):1500–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820d3f55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chylack LT Jr., Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol Jul. 1989;107(7):991–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020053028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross WH. Visual recovery after macula-off retinal detachment. Eye (Lond) Jul. 2002;16(4):440–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Amico D, Tornabe P, Edwin R. Controversies in Care: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Pentavision. Accessed August 28, 2022. https://www.retinalphysician.com/issues/2011/jan-feb/controversies-in-care.

  10. Brown K, Yannuzzi NA, Callaway NF, et al. Surgical outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal detachment in young adults ages 18–30 years. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2135–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.S213042.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Haugstad M, Moosmayer S, Bragadόttir R. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment - surgical methods and anatomical outcome. Acta Ophthalmol May. 2017;95(3):247–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasetty VM, Aye J, Patel N, et al. Outcomes and complications of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair with pars plana vitrectomy in young adults. Int J Retina Vitreous Feb. 2023;22(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00448-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Melberg NS, Thomas MA. Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ophthalmol Oct. 1995;102(10):1466–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30844-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellucci C, Benatti L, Rossi M, et al. Cataract progression following lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Sci Rep Dec. 2022;21(1):22064. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26415-4.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernandez-Bogantes E, Abdala-Figuerola A, Olivo-Payne A, Quiros F, Wu L. Cataract following pars Plana Vitrectomy: a review. Semin Ophthalmol Nov. 2021;17(8):824–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1924799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kataria AS, Thompson JT. Cataract formation and progression in patients less than 50 years of age after vitrectomy. Ophthalmol Retina Mar-Apr. 2017;1(2):149–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2016.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson JT. The role of patient age and intraocular gases in cataract progression following vitrectomy for macular holes and epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2003;101:485–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Blodi BA, Paluska SA. Cataract after vitrectomy in young patients. Ophthalmol Jul. 1997;104(7):1092–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30180-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hosoda Y, Kuriyama S, Hattori H, Hayashi H, Matsumoto M. Outcome of primary vitrectomy in phakic patients aged younger than 50 years with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Jpn J Ophthalmol Sep. 2016;60(5):395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-016-0463-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lv Z, Li Y, Wu Y, Qu Y. Surgical complications of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0116493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fallico M, Alosi P, Reibaldi M, et al. Scleral buckling: a review of clinical aspects and current concepts. J Clin Med Jan. 2022;9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020314.

  22. Beebe DC, Holekamp NM, Shui YB. Oxidative damage and the prevention of age-related cataracts. Ophthalmic Res. 2010;44(3):155–65. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Holekamp NM, Shui YB, Beebe DC. Vitrectomy surgery increases oxygen exposure to the lens: a possible mechanism for nuclear cataract formation. Am J Ophthalmol Feb. 2005;139(2):302–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.09.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harocopos GJ, Shui Y-B, McKinnon M, Holekamp NM, Gordon MO, Beebe DC. Importance of vitreous liquefaction in Age-related cataract. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zong Y, Gao QY, Hui YN. Vitreous function and intervention of it with vitrectomy and other modalities. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(6):857–67. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.06.02.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Popescu SI, Munteanu M, Patoni C, et al. Role of the vitreous in Retinal Pathology: a narrative review. Cureus Aug. 2023;15(8):e43990. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wa C, Yee K, Huang L, Sadun A, Sebag J. Long-term safety of vitrectomy for patients with floaters. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(15):2142–2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Briand S, Chalifoux E, Tourville E, et al. Prospective randomized trial: outcomes of SF6 versus C3F8 in macular hole surgery. Can J Ophthalmol Apr. 2015;50(2):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cole CJ, Charteris DG. Cataract extraction after retinal detachment repair by vitrectomy: visual outcome and complications. Eye (Lond) Jun. 2009;23(6):1377–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hecht I, Mimouni M, Blumenthal EZ, Barak Y. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) versus perfluoropropane (C3F8) in the intraoperative management of macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:1820850. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1820850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Modi A, Giridhar A, Gopalakrishnan M. SULFURHEXAFLUORIDE (SF6) VERSUS PERFLUOROPROPANE (C3F8) GAS AS TAMPONADE IN MACULAR HOLE SURGERY. Retina Feb. 2017;37(2):283–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kontos A, Tee J, Stuart A, Shalchi Z, Williamson TH. Duration of intraocular gases following vitreoretinal surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Feb. 2017;255(2):231–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3438-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanclerz P, Grzybowski A. Complications Associated with the use of expandable gases in vitrectomy. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:8606494. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8606494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Pan CW, Boey PY, Cheng CY, et al. Myopia, axial length, and age-related cataract: the Singapore malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Jul. 2013;2(7):4498–502. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cheng L, Azen SP, El-Bradey MH, et al. Duration of vitrectomy and postoperative cataract in the vitrectomy for macular hole study. Am J Ophthalmol Dec. 2001;132(6):881–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01263-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chu YK, Chung EJ, Kwon OW, Lee JH, Koh HJ. Objective evaluation of cataract progression associated with a high dose intravitreal triamcinolone injection. Eye 2008/07/01. 2008;22(7):895–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Islam MS, Vernon SA, Negi A. Intravitreal triamcinolone will cause posterior subcapsular cataract in most eyes with diabetic maculopathy within 2 years. Eye. 2007;21(3):321–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702304. /03/01 2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson JT. Cataract formation and other complications of intravitreal triamcinolone for macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol Apr. 2006;141(4):629–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.11.050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was obtained in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA

    Venkatkrish M. Kasetty, Pedro F. Monsalve, Dhruv Sethi, Candice Yousif, Thomas Hessburg, Nitin Kumar, Abdualrahman E. Hamad & Uday R. Desai

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Pedro F. Monsalve

Authors
  1. Venkatkrish M. Kasetty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro F. Monsalve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dhruv Sethi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Candice Yousif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas Hessburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nitin Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Abdualrahman E. Hamad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Uday R. Desai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VMK: conception and design of study, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and revision. PM: data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and revision. DS: data collection, manuscript revision. CY: data collection and analysis, manuscript revision. TH: data collection, manuscript revision. NK: data collection, manuscript revision. URD: conception and design of study, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing and revision. AEH: conception and design of study, data collection and analysis, manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatkrish M. Kasetty.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review board at Henry Ford Health System (IRB # 14475). A waiver of consent was granted by the Henry Ford Health System Institutional Review Board. All data used in this study was anonymized before use. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Meeting presentation

This work was presented at the American Society for Retinal Specialists and Retina Society 2023 Annual Meeting.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasetty, V.M., Monsalve, P.F., Sethi, D. et al. Cataract progression after primary pars plana vitrectomy for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in young adults. Int J Retin Vitr 10, 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00538-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00538-4

Keywords

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous

ISSN: 2056-9920

Contact us