Skip to main content
Download PDF

Multi-modal imaging and anatomic classification of the white dot syndromes

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous volume 3, Article number: 12 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

The white dot syndromes (WDS) are a diverse group of posterior uveitidies that share similar clinical findings but are unique from one another. Multimodal imaging has allowed us to better understand the morphology, the activity and age of lesions, and whether there is CNV associated with these different ocular pathologies. The “white dot syndromes” and their uveitic masqueraders can now be anatomically categorized based on lesion localization. The categories include local uveitic syndromes with choroidal pathology, systemic uveitic syndromes with choroidal pathology, and multifocal choroiditis with outer retinal/choriocapillaris pathology with uveitis and without uveitis. Neoplastic and infectious etiologies are also discussed given their ability to masquerade as WDS.

Background

The white dot syndromes (WDS) are a group of inflammatory disorders that affect the outer retinal layers, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and/or choroid [1]. WDS include: birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR), multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS), acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis (MCP), serpiginous choroiditis (SC), punctate inner choroidopathy/multifocal choroiditis (PIC/MFC), and relentless placoid chorioretinitis (RPC). Although overlap and spectrums exist among these diseases, expanded imaging techniques in recent years have further clarified that each WDS represents a unique entity. More precise anatomic localization of the lesions has become possible with combined imaging modalities using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), enhanced depth SD-OCT imaging, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), ultrasonography, wife-field imaging, and autofluorescence. In addition, OCT Angiography is a new modality that has been proven useful in the diagnosis of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Therefore, anatomic classification of these diseases may be more appropriate in the current era, rather than lumping them as “white dot syndromes” (Table 1).

Table 1 Updated classification system
Full size table

Treatment is not a focus of this review paper but it should be noted that in all of the following syndromes that anterior inflammation should be controlled with topical steroids and cycloplegics. Management of posterior sequelae is noted below where pertinent.

Main text

Uveitic syndromes with choroidal-based pathology

Sympathetic ophthalmia

Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a bilateral granulomatous uveitis that occurs weeks to several decades following a penetrating injury or surgical trauma to an eye. Typically, the inflammatory process is confined to the choroid [2–4]. Early on, bilateral anterior cell and mutton-fat keratic precipitates can be observed. Thickening of the iris secondary to infiltration of inflammatory cells and posterior synechiae may also be seen. Posterior-segment examination may reveal vitritis, an exudative retinal detachment, and optic disc edema. The classic fundus finding is the presence of Dalen-Fuchs nodules which appear as focal, elevated yellowish-white lesions between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch’s membrane [2, 3]. With disease progression, patients develop a “sunset glow fundus” secondary to depigmentation of the choroid.

Ultrasound reveals choroidal thickening and may disclose an exudative retinal detachment. Diffuse choroidal thickening, subretinal fluid, and irregular inner and outer segment (IS/OS) junction and external limiting membrane bands can be seen on SD-OCT [5, 6]. Fluorescein angiography demonstrates disk leakage and numerous progressively hyperfluorescent dots at the level of the RPE corresponding to pinpoint leakage. Occasionally, early focal blockage of the background choroidal fluorescence is seen [7]. Choroidal granulomas can be appreciated on ICGA as numerous hypocyanescent patches in the intermediate phase that may progress to isocyanescent in the late phase [8–10].

The prognosis for patients with SO dramatically improves with the use of corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive agents [11, 12]. It is essential that treatment be initiated early in the course of the disease in order to prevent significant vision loss.

Systemic uveitic syndromes with choroidal-based pathology

Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease

Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH) is a bilateral granulomatous uveitis. It is often associated with an exudative retinal detachment and extraocular manifestations, such as pleocytosis of cerebrospinal fluid, tinnitus, hearing loss, dysacusis, and cutaneous changes (e.g.: alopecia, poliosis, and vitiligo). It has a predilection for pigmented races such as Asians, Hispanics, American Indians, and Asian Indians [13, 14].

Patients may initially complain of a non-specific viral-like illness, including fever, nausea, headaches, dizziness, orbital pain, photophobia and meningism. Following this prodromal stage, patients will experience bilateral blurring of vision secondary to posterior uveitis. As the disease progresses the inflammation extends into the anterior segment leading to anterior chamber cell and flare including mutton-fat keratic precipitates. A few months after this uveitic phase, choroidal depigmentation leading to a sunset glow fundus is seen. Chorioretinal atrophy may also be apparent, with a predilection for the inferior mid-periphery of the fundus.

Imaging studies are vital to diagnose and monitor the disease (Fig. 1). Ultrasound may reveal a shallow anterior chamber, cilio-choroidal detachment, thickened ciliary body, and serous retinal detachment. Enhanced depth imaging (EDI) OCT reveals a thickened choroid and can be used to monitor serous retinal detachments. Hypofluorescent pinpoint dots at the early phase of FA followed by multiple focal areas of leakage and subretinal dye accumulation at the late phase can be seen [15–17]. In chronic VKH, peripheral FAF abnormalities are seen. ICGA reveals early choroidal stromal vessel hypercyanescence and vascular leakage, and hypocyanescent dark dots at the level of the choroid in the late phase. Disc hyperfluorescence may also be seen [18, 19].

Fig. 1
figure1

Sunset glow fundus in Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH) disease. Progressive choroidal depigmentation occurs after chronic VKH. Note the peripapillary depigmentation that gives the fundus a red appearance (a–b). Fundus autofluorescence shows patchy hyperautofluorescence (c–d)

Full size image

Treatment involves an extended course of corticosteroids, often greater than 6 months. The addition of immunomodulatory therapy should be utilized in uncontrolled cases. Better visual outcomes have been seen in cases with earlier treatment [20].

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology. The disease is multi-systemic with ocular involvement being found in 15–30% of sarcoid patients [21–25]. Although the disease can affect all races and genders, it is most frequently seen in African Americans [25].

Sarcoidosis can affect the orbit, adnexa, anterior and/or posterior segment. Anterior segment findings may include anterior uveitis with stereotypical mutton-fat keratic precipitates, iris nodules, conjunctival nodules and scleral nodules. Up to 60% of patients with ocular disease have posterior segment findings including vitritis, chorioretinitis, vascular occlusion, perivascular sheathing, neovascularization, and optic nerve head granulomas. Vitreous inflammation may clump to form “string of pearls” or “snowball” vitreous opacities. Periphlebitis is commonly found in the peripheral or mid-peripheral retina with severe periphlebitis being described as appearing as “candle-wax drippings.” Choroidal granulomas appear as isolated or multifocal elevated, subretinal, round-shaped, yellowish lesions. Large granulomas can have overlying serous retinal detachments. On EDI-OCT, Choroidal granulomas appeared as hyporeflective thickening of the choroid [26–28]. On FA, the lesions can demonstrate hypofluorescence, isofluorescence, early blocking with late staining, and hyperfluorescence [26, 29, 30]. Many reports have described the choroidal granulomas as hypofluorescent on ICGA [28, 31].

Treatment includes topical corticosteroid drops for anterior chamber inflammation and cystoid macular edema (CME). However, inflammation of the posterior segment typically involves the use of sub-Tenon’s corticosteroid injections, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, corticosteroid implant, or immunomodulatory therapy. Cycloplegic eye drops can be given to relieve ciliary spasm and to prevent the formation of posterior synechiae [25].

Multifocal choroiditis with outer retinal/choriocapillaris-based pathology without vitritis

Ocular histoplasmosis syndrome

Ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (OHS) is a chorioretinal disorder due to an infection from Histoplasmosis capsulatum, a dimorphic fungus that is endemic to Mississippi and Ohio River valleys in the United States [32, 33]. Humans inhale infectious spores or conidia that subsequently disseminate into the bloodstream and eventually subside. After initial exposure to the fungus, patients may develop mild flu-like symptoms and asymptomatic calcified pulmonary nodules. Patients typically complain of visual symptoms including vision loss, metamorphopsia, and paracentral scotomata years following the resolution of the systemic infection when choroidal neovascularization (CNV) develops [34].

Ophthalmoscopy reveals an absence of vitritis or anterior segment inflammation. Posterior segment examination uncovers the classic triad of “punched-out” chorioretinal lesions in the mid-periphery and posterior pole (“histo spots”), chorioretinal peripapillary atrophy (PPA) and CNV. A general consensus is that at least two of the three posterior segment findings must be present in order to make the diagnosis of OHS. In the acute phase of disease, the histo spots will appear creamy-white and become slightly larger in size and more pigmented as the disease progresses. On OCT, in areas of affected outer retina (histo spots), there is loss of the intrinsic reflectance leading to the appearance of disorganization of the normal hyper-reflective bands [34]. In asymptomatic patients, FA findings show an early window defect pattern of hyperfluorescence with late progressive staining of the mid-peripheral atrophic spots and atrophic macular scars. If subretinal fluid or subretinal hemorrhage is present, early hyperfluorescence and late leakage from small blood vessels in the subretinal or subretinal pigment epithelial space is diagnostic of CNV. CNV can also be seen on OCT angiography (OCT-A). On fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OHS lesions correspond to areas of round hypoautofluorescence. ICGA may be helpful in evaluation of occult CNV exhibiting early increased hypercyanescence corresponding to new, disorganized choriocapillaris.

Punctate inner choroidopathy

Punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) tends to occur in Caucasian, young, myopic female (90%) patients. Patients complain of photopsias, blurred vision, paracentral scotomas, and metamorphopsia. Fundoscopic examination during the acute phase of disease shows discrete, small (100-300 μm), well-delineated, yellow-white lesions in the posterior pole at the level of the RPE, inner choroid or the choriocapillaris (Fig. 2) [35–37]. These lesions may coalesce and develop a serous retinal detachment. Additionally, they may gradually atrophy and become yellow-white chorioretinal scars, which may become pigmented over time. Mild optic disc edema can also be present. CNV is seen on initial presentation in 40–76% of patients [36, 38–40]. Examination does not show signs of anterior uveitis or vitritis [38].

Fig. 2
figure2

Punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC). A 43-year-old myopic woman presented with bilateral multifocal lesions (a–b). Fluorescein angiography (FA) showed blockage and mild rims of hyperfluorescence in earlier frames (c, e), which stained over time (g, i). Indocyanine green (ICG) showed similar patterns but more hypocyanescent overall (d, h, f, j). Fundus autofluorescence demonstrated hypoautofluorescence of the lesions seen on FA and ICG (k, m). Infrared imaging showed hyperreflectance of the lesions (o, q). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography through the fovea of the right eye was normal (l), but the B-scans through the lesion superior to the fovea revealed disruption of the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium (p). Similar lesions were noted in the left eye (n, r)

Full size image

OCT may reveal focal elevation of the RPE with underlying hyporeflective space and focal atrophy of the outer retina and RPE. Intraretinal fluid will be seen on OCT if CNV is present [41]. OCT angiography will detect CNV. The choroidal morphology seen on OCT includes presence of focal hyperreflective dots in the inner choroid and focal thinning of the choroid adjacent to PIC lesions [37, 42]. FA reveals more lesions than seen on clinical exam that appear as early hyperfluorescent lesions, and stain late. Atrophic lesions appear as window defects [1]. Leakage of fluorescence may be seen in the subretinal space if a serous detachment is present and late staining if CNV is present [36]. FAF shows active lesions as hypoautofluorescent spots with a hyperautofluorescent margin [43]. On ICGA, the lesions will appear hypocyanescent and will equal to the number seen on FA. No changes in electroretinography (ERG) or electrooculogram (EOG) are present.

CNV and CME can cause significantly impaired vision over time. Aggressive treatment of CNV can be associated with the maintenance of 20/40 or better visual acuity [44]. Recurrence is common and can be seen in 33–66.7% of patients [44–46].

Multifocal choroiditis with outer retinal/choriocapillaris-based pathology with vitritis

Multifocal choroiditis with Panuveitis

Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis (MCP) is a chronic, bilateral disease that generally affects young, healthy individuals, especially myopic females between the third and fifth decade of life [47, 48]. Patients complain of blurred vision, floaters and/or scotoma. They may also experience photopsias. The choroid, RPE, and retina are primarily involved [49].

Patients develop periodic episodes of clinically evident anterior uveitis and/or vitreous inflammation, differentiating it from ocular histoplasmosis. Yellow-white chorioretinal inflammatory lesions are visible in the posterior pole and periphery [50]. The lesions eventually evolve into punched-out scars with pigmented borders. Both eyes are generally affected, however, lesions may appear asymmetric due to delayed development between the two eyes. During active disease, a hyperemic disc, retinal vasculitis and CME can also be seen [51]. The most frequent cause of severe visual loss in these patients is from the development of CME and/or macular and juxtapapillary CNV [39, 52].

OCT reveals the presence of drusen-like sub-RPE material, choroidal hyperreflectivity below the lesions, and overlying vitreous cells [53]. On FA, acute lesions exhibit early hypofluoresence with late hyperfluorescent staining. CME and CNV may also be seen. FAF reveals hypoautofluorescent lesions in the posterior pole and periphery. ICGA imaging shows hypocyanescent spots within the choroid in quantities greater than lesions seen on ophthalmoscopy. Multifocal ERG generally reveals diffuse loss of function [54]. A recent study has shown the utility of OCT-angiography in diagnosis and evaluating response to treatment of associated CNV [55].

Disease reoccurrence is common [56]. Many patients with MCP have a poor visual prognosis due to disciform macular scarring, atrophy, or chronic CME [49, 50]. Treatment relies on the use of topical or periocular corticosteroids with use of systemic immunosuppressives if warranted. Secondary CNV can be managed expectantly with anti-VEGF agents.

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome

MEWDS is an acute, multifocal, mostly unilateral disease affecting young adults. It affects females more than males with a ratio of 5:1 [57]. These patients are typically healthy and in their second to fourth decades of life. Roughly one half of the patients affected by this disease state that they had a prodromal flu-like illness preceding their ocular complaints [58]. Patients complain of acute onset of blurred vision, shimmering photopsias, dyschromatopsia, temporal vision loss, and paracentral or temporal scotomas [59]. Visual acuity may vary from 20/20 to 20/400 and a relative afferent pupillary defect may be present. Visual field testing may show an enlarged blind spot. There will be no anterior chamber inflammation. However, a mild vitritis is observed. The lesions are typically ill-defined and yellowish-white in color. They are located at the level of the RPE or outer retina and found predominantly in the perimacular area and extend out to the mid-peripheral retina. These routinely resolve within weeks to months and reoccurrence is rare. Mild pigmentary changes may develop following their resolution. Classically, foveal granularity is observed [60].

OCT shows disruption of the ellipsoid zone (Fig. 3). Accumulation of hyperreflective material that rests on the RPE and extends anteriorly through the interdigitation zone, ellipsoid zone, and outer nuclear layer (ONL) can also be seen on OCT [61]. FA exhibits a variable number of early hyperfluorescent lesions in a wreathlike configuration in the mid-retina which persists into the late phase of the FA [61]. ICGA shows early and mid-phase hypocyanescent dots and/or plaques that are greater in number than those evident on FA. FAF demonstrates areas of hyperautofluorescence in the acute phase of the disease. Pinpoint hypoautofluorescence corresponding to the foveal granularity may also be seen [62]. A recent study examining wide-field FAF showed that the lesions first arise in the posterior pole and spread to the periphery during the acute stage; the lesions then fade from the periphery in a centripetal manner [63]. ERG may demonstrate reduced amplitude of the a-wave. The EOG may also be abnormal. However, both the ERG and EOG tend to normalize following resolution of the disease [64].

Fig. 3
figure3

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. A 26-year-old woman presented with mildly decreased vision and photopsias. Fluorescein angiography revealed early hyperfluorescent lesions in a wreathlike configuration (top left) which persist into the late phase (top right). Optical coherence tomography shows disruption of the ellipsoid zone, and accumulation of hyperreflective material that rests on the RPE and extends anteriorly through the interdigitation zone, ellipsoid zone, and outer nuclear layer (bottom right)

Full size image

MEWDS has an overall good prognosis as most patients’ vision and visual fields are restored to baseline in several weeks to months. However, although rare, some patient may have a persistent blind spot enlargement, photopsias, and dyschromatopsia. No treatment is typically needed as most cases resolve spontaneously and recurrence is rare [60].

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) is an acute-onset inflammatory disease that affects the choriocapillaris, RPE, and outer retina. It typically affects young females, often in the second and third decades of life [1]. This disease is found equally between men and women [50]. Seventy-five percent of patients have bilateral presentation with the second eye affected within a few days or weeks following the first. The etiology is unknown; however, Gass felt APMPPE is often preceded by a viral prodrome [65]. Patients complain of bilateral, sudden, painless vision loss.

Ophthalmic examination does not reveal anterior inflammation; however, mild to moderate vitreous cell may be seen. Numerous, yellow, creamy colored placoid lesions are seen in the posterior pole and are not seen anterior to the equator. The lesions are often in various stages of evolution. A central clearing will be seen as they begin to resolve roughly within 2–3 months and progressively become hypopigmented. OCT exhibits hyperreflectivity of the outer retinal layers in the early stages which is thought to reflect swelling of the outer retinal cells or presence of inflammatory cell infiltrates [66, 67]. As the lesions resolve, hyperreflectivity of the outer retinal layers decreases. Disruption of the IS/OS junction and outer retina, and RPE atrophy can persist [68–71]. FA reveals lesions that characteristically demonstrate early hypofluorescence that subsequently hyperfluorescence in the late venous phase. The lesions seen on FAF are hypoautofluorescent and appear later and are less numerous than APMPPE lesions seen clinically. In the acute phase of disease, ICGA reveals more numerous hypocyanescent lesions than those seen on ophthalmoscopy. Studies have revealed that in the acute phase of disease, a large delay in choroidal filling as well as extensive areas of choroidal vessel nonperfusion can be seen. Furthermore, recovery of the choroidal blood flow is evident during clinical resolution [72–74]. OCT angiography has demonstrated these hypoperfused areas corresponding to the changes seen on ICGA [75]. Deutman et al. studied EOG and ERG recordings in APMPPE patients. ERG findings revealed marginally abnormal values of the a- and b-wave amplitudes in the acute phase of disease. The EOG recordings were also abnormal in the acute phase but showed improvement with disease resolution [76] which is usually seen within 2–3 months. These course is often self-limiting and patients typically have a good visual prognosis. However, foveal involvement, older age, unilateral disease, and recurrent disease are features that may contribute to poor visual prognosis. In these cases systemic steroids have been reported as beneficial but further studies are needed to determine if there is true efficacy [59].

Serpiginous choroiditis

Serpiginous choroiditis (SC) is a rare condition that affects men slightly more than women in their second to seventh decades of life [50, 59, 77–79]. It typically is a bilateral disease that is chronic and progressive in nature. The RPE, choriocapillaris, and choroid are involved [80–83].

Although SC usually has bilateral involvement, patients typically present with unilateral decreased central vision, metamorphopsia, or scotoma. Anterior segment inflammation is usually mild, and the vitreous may be clear or show minimal inflammation. Ophthalmoscopy reveals lesions originating in the peripapillary region or macula in active disease that appear as areas of grayish or creamy yellow sub-retinal infiltrates. These lesions progress in an irregular serpentine or helicoid fashion centrifugally (Fig. 4). Overlying retina edema is also present. Different stages of healing are seen between the lesions as they resolve, typically around 8-weeks. This resolution leaves areas of atrophy involving both the choriocapillaris and RPE. Multiple recurrences are common and new lesions are classically found at the edge of previous atrophic scars. Macular involvement is associated with worse visual prognosis and higher risk of secondary CNV.

Fig. 4
figure4

Serpiginous choroiditis. A 68-year-old woman presented with chronic visual field defects in both eyes. Lesions deep to the retina were noted bilaterally emanating from the optic disc (top row). Fundus autofluorescence revealed central hypoautofluorescence with rims of hyperautofluorescence (second row). Fluorescein angiography showed central patches of hypofluorescence with hyperfluorescent staining over time (third row). Central spectral-domain optical coherence tomography revealed a normal fovea, but there was disruption of the ellipsoid zone, external limiting membrane, and retinal pigment epithelium, nasally (bottom rows). The yellow arrow corresponds to the same area illustrated in all images

Full size image

Active lesions on OCT show hyper-reflectivity and thickening of the outer retina. There is also increased reflectance of the choroid which has been referred to as the ‘waterfall’ effect. The photoreceptor inner and outer segment (IS/OS) junction in both active and inactive lesions will be disrupted [84]. FA of the active lesions show early hypofluorescence and late hyperfluorescence of the border in a typical geographic pattern. Old lesions show window defects, and late staining. ICGA can be divided into four stages. The first reveals hypocyanescent lesions in the subclinical or choroidal stage. The second, hypocyanescent lesions in the active phase. Third, hypercyanescence in the healing and sub-healing stage and the fourth is hypocyanescent lesions with clearly defined margins in the inactive phase [50, 85]. FAF shows new hyperautofluorescent lesions appearing at the edge of old lesions which are hypofluorescent [85]. Electrophysiologic studies are usually normal.

Rapid control of the active lesions with periocular and systemic corticosteroids are necessary to limit extensive scarring and secondary CNV [77, 87]. Long-term steroid-sparing therapy such as cyclosporine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, interferon alpha-2a, or mycophenolate mofetil may be needed to prevent recurrence [78, 88–91]. It should be noted that tuberculosis can cause a serpiginous-like choroidopathy (SLC). SLC is less likely to respond to sole treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants making Tb testing mandatory especially in endemic regions. Differentiating SC and SLC based on imaging findings is discussed in the infectious section below.

Relentless placoid chorioretinitis

Relentless placoid chorioretinitis (RPC) is a chronic, relapsing disease of unknown etiology. Men and women are equally affected typically in their second to sixth decades of life [92]. Patients may complain of blurred vision, metamorphopsia, pericentral scotomas, photopsias, and/or floaters [93]. It was formerly known as ampiginous chorioretinitis.

This disease is often confused with APMPPE and SC. RPC can appear very similar to APMPPE or macular serpiginous initially, and the relentless course beyond 6 months is often the key to its diagnosis and differentiation from APMPPE. Ophthalmoscopy reveals creamy white lesions roughly one-half disc diameters in size at the level of the RPE initially in the posterior pole [94]. The lesions are often found bilaterally affecting the mid- and far periphery first with subsequent involvement of the posterior pole and/or macula. The lesions can remain active and spread or heal causing pigmented chorioretinal atrophy. The presence of > 50 to hundreds of lesions in different stages of activity found anterior and posterior to the equator is characteristic of this disease entity [1]. Anterior chamber and vitreous cells are typically seen. A similar condition is persistent placoid maculopathy, which is more in the MEWDS spectrum. RPC can be distinguished from persistent placoid in that RPC tends to occupy the peripheral retina.

If foveal lesions are present in RPC, OCT may reveal subfoveal fluid. In addition, a pigment epithelial detachment (PED) with hyperreflectivity of the inner and outer retinal layers can also be seen [95]. FA reveals early hypofluorescence and late staining (Fig. 5). Yeh et al. [86] looked at FAF imaging of a patient with RPC which displayed widespread hypoautofluorescence involving the posterior pole and mid-peripheral retina. Hypocyanescence in the areas corresponding to the clinical lesions that persists into the late phases is seen on ICGA [92, 93]. ERG and EOG are normal. Treatment involves systemic corticosteroids with addition of immunosupressives if warranted. Although this is a chronic disease and relapse is common, the long-term visual prognosis is generally good.

Fig. 5
figure5

Relentless placoid chorioretinitis. Numerous chorioretinal scars of different ages are evident in the fundus photo (left) of this 25 year-old patient with relentless placoid chorioretinitis. Similar findings were present in the other eye. Fluorescein angiography (right) demonstrates staining of the chorioretinal scars in the late phase with blockage from the older hyperpigmented regions. These lesions were deemed inactive

Full size image

Birdshot chorioretinopathy

Birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR) has a slight female predominance and is typically found in patients between the ages of 40 and 60 [96–98]. The etiology of BCR remains unclear, however studies have shown that of the patients who have BCR, nearly 90% possess human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) A29. This is the highest association of any HLA antigen with a human disease [97]. Testing for HLA-A29 in useful in making the diagnosis as it has a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 93% [48, 99].

Patients may initially complain of blurred vision that is often out of proportion to the visual acuity loss, floaters, photopsia, and later may experience nyctalopia or color blindness. Creamy lesions seen on fundus examination are typically oval or round in shape, and one-quarter to one-half disc diameter in size. They can present asymmetrically between the eyes and be subtle in appearance. The lesions typically cluster around the optic disk, most commonly nasal and inferior to the disk, and radiate out to the equator (Fig. 6) [100]. Vitreous inflammation is seen in nearly every patient. However, inflammation in the anterior segment is generally absent. Retinal vasculitis manifests as narrowed retinal vessels [59]. CME, and disc edema can also be seen [96].

Fig. 6
figure6

Birdshot uveitis. A 58-year-old woman presented with photophobia in both eyes. White, deep, multifocal, choroidal lesions were seen on examination, mostly located nasally (top row). Fundus autofluorescence showed that these lesions were hypoautofluorescent (second row). The lesions were hyperfluorescent on fluorescein angiography (third row), and corresponded to hypocyanescent spots on indocyanine green (bottom row). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographies of the fovea in both eyes were relatively unremarkable. Enhanced-depth imaging of lesions seen on previous imaging (yellow circles) demonstrates focally disrupted outer retinal structures with increased transmission into the choroid. Work-up revealed HLA-A29 positivity

Full size image

OCT is typically employed to follow CME. Interestingly, a recent study used extramacular EDI-OCT and found BCR patients had focal or generalized disruption of the photoreceptor IS/OS junction. Many patients exhibited thinning or absence of the Sattler layer, or had an appearance of generalized atrophy of the choroid [101]. FA reveals optic disc hyperfluorescence, vascular leakage, late CME, and prolonged arteriovenous transit time [97, 102]. This delayed transit time is a phenomenon call “quenching” and is unique to BCR [48]. With FAF, hypoautofluorescent areas corresponding to areas of chorioretinal atrophy are noted [86]. ICGA is a sensitive diagnostic test and useful at visualizing the birdshot lesions as areas of blockage in the early to midphase. A recent report showed a series of patients with BCR exhibiting lesions on ICGA before the lesions were visible on clinical examination or FA [103]. ERG has been shown to be abnormal in 88.8% of patients in a study that analyzed data from 10 published articles (89 patients) [97]. Classically delayed 30-Hz implicit time and diminished scotopic b-wave amplitudes will be seen [104]. The ERG is an important tool for studying progression of disease. EOG is typically normal. Visual field examinations are important as peripheral constriction, enlarged blind spot, central or paracentral scotomas can be present.

Long-term prognosis is guarded as the disease is chronic and does not appear to regress. The causes of vision loss is multifactorial and includes loss of photoreceptors, macular edema, and disc edema leading to optic disc atrophy. In the short term, corticosteroids can be used. However, due to their side effects, steroid-sparing medications like cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate or biologics should be considered for long-term management.

Neoplastic

Three distinct forms of intraocular lymphoma exist and include primary vitreoretinal (PVRL), primary uveal and secondary (metastatic) lymphoma. Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) affects the vitreous and RPE. Uveal tissue is the primary site of involvement in metastatic and uveal lymphoma [105–107]. Most patients present with painless, decreased visual acuity or floaters [108, 109].

PVRL is the most common intraocular lymphoma and is often associated with central nervous system (CNS) disease. It is commonly seen in older or immunocompromised patients. Most cases are bilateral, but asymmetric in presentation [110, 111]. The presence of clumped vitreous cells and multiple irregular yellowish white sub-RPE deposits are pathognomonic features [112–115]. Punched-out lesions leading to a disciform-like scar, retinal vasculitis, solid RPE detachment or exudative retinal detachment can also be present. OCT can show pigment epithelial detachments and exudates above the RPE [116]. EDI-OCT is particularly useful for choroidal lymphoma that has thin tumor infiltration. It may show a “placid, rippled, or stormy (seasick)” appearance depending on the thickness of invasion [117]. FA findings can vary and may reveal staining of subretinal deposits, RPE window defects, and diffuse RPE granularity [106, 118]. FAF will show hyperautofluorescence of the RPE over the lymphoma deposits. Retinal deposits overlying the RPE are hypoautofluorescent due to blocking. A study by Casady et al. showed that the majority of patients have a granular hyperautofluorescence and hypoautofluorescence on FAF. All of these patients were also found to have active disease at the time of imaging [119].

Primary uveal and secondary (metastatic) lymphoma usually present unilaterally [120]. The majority of patients have vitreous cell on examination. Anterior cell and flare is rare. Characteristically, multiple yellow subretinal infiltrates will be seen on fundus examination that may result in overlying RPE detachments [121]. Creamy thickening of the choroid diffusely and RPE clumping may also be present. Collections of tumor cells in the sub-RPE can be seen on OCT. FA may demonstrate RPE granularity, blockage by RPE pigment clumps or disrupted RPE, and late staining [118, 122]. Tumor cell infiltrates may be seen as round hypofluorescent lesions [123]. Diffuse uveal thickening, subretinal masses, and intravitreal cells can be seen on ultrasonography. Typically, ICGA reveals hypocyanescent lesions corresponding to the clinically observed choroidal infiltrates [120].

Infectious

Some infectious etiologies can be confused for the WDS’s, including syphilitic chorioretinitis, ocular tuberculosis (TB), and Lyme disease. These infections are treatable masquerade syndromes, thus any suspicion in the history or exam findings should prompt a laboratory workup.

Syphilitic inflammatory lesions can be seen affecting the outer retina, RPE, and choroid. The lesions in the fundus may appear as yellow, placoid, chorioretinal lesions in the posterior pole or within the macula (Fig. 7) [124]. A faded center and clumping of the adjacent retinal pigment epithelium may be present. OCT may reveal areas of loss in the IS/OS junction and external limiting membrane [125, 126]. Hypofluorescent areas can be seen on FA corresponding to the fundus lesions. Sporadically leopard spotting may be seen as hypo- and hyperfluorescence in the faded part of the lesions, followed by progressive hyperfluorescence [127]. ERG may be markedly reduced [128].

Fig. 7
figure7

Syphilitic Uveitis. A 55 year-old man presented with new onset panuveitis in the right eye; he was found to be seropositive for syphilis. Color fundus photo (top left) and autofluorescence (top right) of the right eye demonstrate the characteristic placoid appearance of the syphilitic lesions. Optical coherence tomography (bottom) reveals segmental loss of ellipsoid zone

Full size image

Ocular tuberculosis (TB) most commonly affects the choroid. Choroidal tuberculomas, choroidal tubercles, multifocal choroiditis, and serpiginous-like choroiditis can be seen [129, 130]. Miliary choroidal tubercles appear as small flat, yellow-white lesions with indistinct borders in the choroid and can grow into a single mass lesion called a tuberculoma (Fig. 8). A study by Salman et al. studied OCT findings in nine patients with choroidal tuberculosis and found areas of localized adhesion between the RPE-choriocapillaris layer and the overlying neurosensory retina. They termed this the “contact sign” [131]. FA of choroidal tubercles show hypofluorescent lesions during dye transit then become hyperfluorescent in the late frames. However, healed tubercles will show transmission hyperfluorescence. Choroidal tuberculomas show early hyperfluorescence that increases in hyperfluorescence, with pooling of dye during the late phase secondary to an exudative retinal detachment [132]. FA in serpiginous-like choroiditis reveals hypofluorescence of the active edge initially with late hyperfluorescence of the advancing edge [133]. ICGA of choroidal lesions in the acute phase will appear hypofluorescent during the initial and transit period. However, as the angiogram progresses into the late phase, the edges become hyperfluorescent. In contrast, active lesions seen in serpiginous-like choroiditis are seen as hypofluorescent spots during the early and late phases of ICGA. Patients with ocular Lyme disease characteristically complain of photophobia and severe periodic ocular pain [134]. Choroiditis has been reported [134, 135] and described as multiple, well circumscribed creamy lesions seen deep in the retina with pigmentation and choroidal atrophy. FA in one case revealed deep hypofluorescence of the creamy lesions that contrasted with the granular hyperfluorescence of the lesions seen in the periphery.

Fig. 8
figure8

Panuveitis Secondary to Tuberculosis. Color fundus photograph (top left) of a 50 year-old woman with a history of tuberculosis developed serpiginous choroidal atrophy in the left and right eyes. Fluorescein angiography (top right), indocyanine green angiography (bottom left) and fundus autofluorescence (bottom right) demonstrate areas of hypofluorescence corresponding to the regions of chorioretinal atrophy

Full size image

Conclusion

Given their overlapping historical, clinical and imaging features, the white dot syndromes and their masqueraders represent a difficult diagnostic challenge for many clinicians. Distinguishing these entities is important as some of these entities such as APMPPE have a self-limited course and an excellent visual prognosis while others such as birdshot chorioretinopathy have a chronic course and a more guarded prognosis. Furthermore, accurate diagnosis can ensure appropriate monitoring is initiated. Entities such as PIC must be monitored closely to detect development of CNV to ensure early vision saving treatment. Correct diagnosis can also aid in laboratory testing for associated autoimmune conditions or infectious associations. Ongoing research and expanded imaging techniques have made it apparent that each syndrome represents a unique entity with specific anatomic localization (Table 2). Combining imaging modalities including SD-OCT, enhanced depth SD-OCT, FA, ICGA, ultrasonography, wide-field imaging, autofluorescence, and now OCT angiography can greatly help in distinguishing between the various WDS’s.

Table 2 Clinical and multimodal imaging findings seen in the white dot syndromes and their masqueraders
Full size table

Abbreviations

WDS:

white dot syndromes

BC:

birdshot chorioretinopathy

MEWDS:

multiple evanescent white dot syndrome

APMPPE:

acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

MCP:

multifocal choroiditis

SC:

serpiginous choroiditis

RPC:

relentless placoid chorioretinitis

PIC:

punctate inner choroidopathy

SO:

sympathetic ophthalmia

VKH:

Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease

OHS:

ocular histoplasmosis syndrome

PVRL:

primary vitreoretinal

CNS:

central nervous system

TB:

tuberculosis

EDI:

enhanced depth imaging

SD-OCT:

spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

FA:

fluorescein angiography

FAF:

fundus autofluorescence

ICGA:

indocyanine green angiography

RPE:

retinal pigment epithelium

IS/OS:

inner and outer segment

CME:

cystoid macular edema

CNV:

choroidal neovascularization

PPA:

peripapillary atrophy

ONL:

outer nuclear layer

ERG:

electroretinography

EOG:

electrooculogram

References

  1. 1.

    Mirza RG, Moorthy RS, Jampol LM. Posterior uveitis of unknown cause—white spot syndromes. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editors. Ophthalmology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier-Health Sciences Division; 2014. p. 778–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Duke-Elder S. Sympathetic ophthalmitis. St Louis: Mosby; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Goto H, Rao NA. Sympathetic ophthalmia and Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1990;30(4):279–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Castiblanco CP, Adelman RA. Sympathetic ophthalmia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(3):289–302.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Behdad B, Rahmani S, Montahaei T, Soheilian R, Soheilian M. Enhanced depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) findings in acute phase of sympathetic ophthalmia. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35(3):433–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gupta V, Gupta A, Dogra MR, Singh I. Reversible retinal changes in the acute stage of sympathetic ophthalmia seen on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31(2):105–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Correnti AJ, Read RW, Kimble JA, Morris R. Imaging of Dalen-Fuchs nodules in a likely case of sympathetic ophthalmia by fluorescein angiography and OCT. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;9:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bernasconi O, Auer C, Zografos L, Herbort CP. Indocyanine green angiographic findings in sympathetic ophthalmia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(8):635–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Saatci AO, Pasa E, Soylev MF, Kocak N, Durak I, Kaynak S. Sympathetic ophthalmia and indocyanine green angiography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(10):1568–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moshfeghi AA, Harrison SA, Ferrone PJ. Indocyanine green angiography findings in sympathetic ophthalmia. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36(2):163–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vote BJ, Hall A, Cairns J, Buttery R. Changing trends in sympathetic ophthalmia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(5):542–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chan CC, Roberge RG, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB. 32 cases of sympathetic ophthalmia. A retrospective study at the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Md., from 1982 to 1992. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(5):597–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shimizu K. Vogt–Koyanagi syndromes—are they clinical entities? Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1973;77(3):OP281–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Moorthy RS, Inomata H, Rao NA. Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;39(4):265–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Attia S, Khochtali S, Kahloun R, et al. Clinical and multimodal imaging characteristics of acute Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease unassociated with clinically evident exudative retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol. 2016;36(1):37–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chee SP, Jap A, Cheung CM. The prognostic value of angiography in Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(6):888–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Burkholder BM. Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(6):506–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Herbort CP, Mantovani A, Bouchenaki N. Indocyanine green angiography in Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease: angiographic signs and utility in patient follow-up. Int Ophthalmol. 2007;27(2–3):173–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miyanaga M, Kawaguchi T, Miyata K, Horie S, Mochizuki M, Herbort CP. Indocyanine green angiography findings in initial acute pretreatment Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease in Japanese patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(5):377–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Silpa-Archa S, Silpa-Archa N, Preble JM, Foster CS. Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome: perspectives for immunogenetics, multimodal imaging, and therapeutic options. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15(8):809-19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    James DG, Neville E, Siltzbach LE. A worldwide review of sarcoidosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;278:321–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    James D. Sarcoidosis. In: Wyngaarden JB, Smith Jr LH, editors. Cecil textbook of medicine. 17th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    James DG. Ocular sarcoidosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;465:551–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Obenauf CD, Shaw HE, Sydnor CF, Klintworth GK. Sarcoidosis and its ophthalmic manifestations. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86(5):648–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pasadhika S, Rosenbaum JT. Ocular Sarcoidosis. Clin Chest Med. 2015;36(4):669–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rostaqui O, Querques G, Haymann P, Fardeau C, Coscas G, Souied EH. Visualization of sarcoid choroidal granuloma by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2014;22(3):239–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Invernizzi A, Mapelli C, Viola F, et al. Choroidal granulomas visualized by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2015;35(3):525–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Modi YS, Epstein A, Bhaleeya S, Harbour JW, Albini T. Multimodal imaging of sarcoid choroidal granulomas. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2013;3(1):58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Levy-Clarke G, Saligan L. Ocular manifestations of sarcoidosis. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D, Blodi B, Cohan J, Perkins T, editors. Albert & Jakobiec’s principles & practice of ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Verma A, Biswas J. Choroidal granuloma as an initial manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(5):603–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wolfensberger TJ, Herbort CP. Indocyanine green angiographic features in ocular sarcoidosis. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(2):285–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Asbury T. The status of presumed ocular histoplasmosis: including a report of a survey. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1966;64:371–400.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Find SL. Ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1977;17(2):75–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Diaz RI, Sigler EJ, Rafieetary MR, Calzada JI. Ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(4):279–95.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Amer R, Lois N. Punctate inner choroidopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(1):36–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Watzke RC, Packer AJ, Folk JC, Benson WE, Burgess D, Ober RR. Punctate inner choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(5):572–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jo Y, Gomi F, Ikuno Y. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic findings in punctate inner choroidopathy. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2012;6(2):189–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kedhar SR, Thorne JE, Wittenberg S, Dunn JP, Jabs DA. Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis and punctate inner choroidopathy: comparison of clinical characteristics at presentation. Retina. 2007;27(9):1174–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Brown J Jr, Folk JC, Reddy CV, Kimura AE. Visual prognosis of multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner choroidopathy, and the diffuse subretinal fibrosis syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(7):1100–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gerstenblith AT, Thorne JE, Sobrin L, et al. Punctate inner choroidopathy: a survey analysis of 77 persons. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(6):1201–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stepien KE, Carroll J. Using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography to follow outer retinal structure changes in a patient with recurrent punctate inner choroidopathy. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:753741.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zarranz-Ventura J, Sim DA, Keane PA, et al. Characterization of punctate inner choroidopathy using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(9):1790–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li M, Zhang X, Wen F. The fundus autofluorescence spectrum of punctate inner choroidopathy. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:202097.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Patel KH, Birnbaum AD, Tessler HH, Goldstein DA. Presentation and outcome of patients with punctate inner choroidopathy at a tertiary referral center. Retina. 2011;31(7):1387–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Campos J, Campos A, Mendes S, Neves A, Beselga D, Sousa JC. Punctate inner choroidopathy: a systematic review. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2014;3(3):76–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Olsen TW, Capone A Jr, Sternberg P Jr, Grossniklaus HE, Martin DF, Aaberg TM Sr. Subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in punctate inner choroidopathy. Surgical management and pathologic findings. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(12):2061–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fung AT, Pal S, Yannuzzi NA, et al. Multifocal choroiditis without panuveitis: clinical characteristics and progression. Retina. 2014;34(1):98–107.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Matsumoto Y, Haen SP, Spaide RF. The white dot syndromes. Compr Ophthalmol Update. 2007;8(4):179–200 (discussion 3-4).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dreyer RF, Gass DJ. Multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis. A syndrome that mimics ocular histoplasmosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(12):1776–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Quillen DA, Davis JB, Gottlieb JL, et al. The white dot syndromes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(3):538–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    De Meyer V, Lafaut BA, Van de Sompel W, De Laey JJ. Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis and punctate inner choroidopathy: a mini review. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1999;273:115–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Thorne JE, Wittenberg S, Jabs DA, et al. Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis incidence of ocular complications and of loss of visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(12):2310–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Vance SK, Khan S, Klancnik JM, Freund KB. Characteristic spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings of multifocal choroiditis. Retina. 2011;31(4):717–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Oh KT, Folk JC, Maturi RK, Moore P, Kardon RH. Multifocal electroretinography in multifocal choroiditis and the multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. Retina. 2001;21(6):581–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Baumal CR, de Carlo TE, Waheed NK, Salz DA, Witkin AJ, Duker JS. Sequential optical coherence tomographic angiography for diagnosis and treatment of choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(9):1087–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Morgan CM, Schatz H. Recurrent multifocal choroiditis. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(9):1138–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Polk TD, Goldman EJ. White-dot chorioretinal inflammatory syndromes. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1999;39(4):33–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ryan PT. Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome: a review and case report. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93(5):324–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Crawford CM, Igboeli O. A review of the inflammatory chorioretinopathies: the white dot syndromes. ISRN Inflamm. 2013;2013:783190.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jampol LM, Sieving PA, Pugh D, Fishman GA, Gilbert H. Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. I. Clinical findings. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(5):671–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Marsiglia M, Gallego-Pinazo R, Cunha de Souza E, et al. Expanded clinical spectrum of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome with multimodal imaging. Retina. 2016;36(1):64–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    dell’Omo R, Pavesio CE. Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012;52(4):221–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hashimoto H, Kishi S. Ultra-wide-field fundus autofluorescence in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(4):698–706.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sieving PA, Fishman GA, Jampol LM, Pugh D. Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. II. Electrophysiology of the photoreceptors during retinal pigment epithelial disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(5):675–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Gass JD. Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;80(2):177–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Souka AA, Hillenkamp J, Gora F, Gabel VP, Framme C. Correlation between optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(10):1219–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wong E, Nivison-Smith L, Assaad NN, Kalloniatis M. OCT and fundus autofluorescence enhances visualization of white dot syndromes. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(5):642–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lofoco G, Ciucci F, Bardocci A, Quercioli P, Steigerwalt RD Jr, De Gaetano C. Optical coherence tomography findings in a case of acute multifocal posterior placoid pigment epitheliopathy (AMPPPE). Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15(1):143–7.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Cheung CM, Yeo IY, Koh A. Photoreceptor changes in acute and resolved acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy documented by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(5):644–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Scheufele TA, Witkin AJ, Schocket LS, et al. Photoreceptor atrophy in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy demonstrated by optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2005;25(8):1109–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Birnbaum AD, Blair MP, Tessler HH, Goldstein DA. Subretinal fluid in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Retina. 2010;30(5):810–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Dhaliwal RS, Maguire AM, Flower RW, Arribas NP. Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. An indocyanine green angiographic study. Retina. 1993;13(4):317–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Howe LJ, Woon H, Graham EM, Fitzke F, Bhandari A, Marshall J. Choroidal hypoperfusion in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. An indocyanine green angiography study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(5):790–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Park D, Schatz H, McDonald HR, Johnson RN. Indocyanine green angiography of acute multifocal posterior placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(12):1877–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Maier M, Wehrmann K, Lohmann CP, Feucht N. OCT angiography findings in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE). Ophthalmologe. 2017;114(1):60–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Deutman AF, Oosterhuis JA, Boen-Tan TN, Aan de Kerk AL. Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Pigment epitheliopathy of choriocapillaritis? Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(12):863–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Weiss H, Annesley WH Jr, Shields JA, Tomer T, Christopherson K. The clinical course of serpiginous choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;87(2):133–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Akpek EK, Jabs DA, Tessler HH, Joondeph BC, Foster CS. Successful treatment of serpiginous choroiditis with alkylating agents. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(8):1506–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Chisholm IH, Gass JD, Hutton WL. The late stage of serpiginous (geographic) choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82(3):343–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Abu el-Asrar AM. Serpiginous (geographical) choroiditis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1995;35(2):87–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Bacin F, Larmande J, Boulmier A, Juillard G. Serpiginous choroiditis and placoid epitheliopathy. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1983;83(10):1153–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ciulla TA, Gragoudas ES. Serpiginous choroiditis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1996;36(1):135–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lim WK, Lim LS, Nussenblatt RB. Serpiginous Choroiditis. In: Albert DM, Miller JW, Azar DT, Blodi BA, editors. Albert and Jakobiec’s principles and practice of ophthalmology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2008. p. 1245–53.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Duker JS, Waheed NK, Goldman DR. Serpiginous choroiditis. In: Duker JS, Waheed NK, Goldman DR, editors. Handbook of retinal OCT: optical coherence tomography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2014. p. 118–9.

  85. 85.

    Bouchenaki N, Cimino L, Auer C, Tao Tran V, Herbort CP. Assessment and classification of choroidal vasculitis in posterior uveitis using indocyanine green angiography. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002;219(4):243–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Yeh S, Forooghian F, Wong WT, et al. Fundus autofluorescence imaging of the white dot syndromes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(1):46–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Markomichelakis NN, Halkiadakis I, Papaeythymiou-Orchan S, Giannakopoulos N, Ekonomopoulos N, Kouris T. Intravenous pulse methylprednisolone therapy for acute treatment of serpiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006;14(1):29–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Sobaci G, Bayraktar Z, Bayer A. Interferon alpha-2a treatment for serpiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2005;13(1):59–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Secchi AG, Tognon MS, Maselli C. Cyclosporine-A in the treatment of serpiginous choroiditis. Int Ophthalmol. 1990;14(5–6):395–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Akpek EK, Baltatzis S, Yang J, Foster CS. Long-term immunosuppressive treatment of serpiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2001;9(3):153–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Christmas NJ, Oh KT, Oh DM, Folk JC. Long-term follow-up of patients with serpinginous choroiditis. Retina. 2002;22(5):550–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Jones BE, Jampol LM, Yannuzzi LA, et al. Relentless placoid chorioretinitis: a new entity or an unusual variant of serpiginous chorioretinitis? Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(7):931–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Mirza RG, Jampol LM. Relentless placoid chorioretinitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012;52(4):237–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Jyotirmay B, Jafferji SS, Sudharshan S, Kalpana B. Clinical profile, treatment, and visual outcome of ampiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18(1):46–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Amer R, Florescu T. Optical coherence tomography in relentless placoid chorioretinitis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(4):388–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Jampol LM, Becker KG. White spot syndromes of the retina: a hypothesis based on the common genetic hypothesis of autoimmune/inflammatory disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(3):376–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Shah KH, Levinson RD, Yu F, et al. Birdshot chorioretinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(6):519–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Faia LJ. Gender differences in birdshot chorioretinopathy and the white dot syndromes: do they exist? J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:146768.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Feltkamp TE. Ophthalmological significance of HLA associated uveitis. Eye (Lond). 1990;4(Pt 6):839–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Priem HA, Oosterhuis JA. Birdshot chorioretinopathy: clinical characteristics and evolution. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;72(9):646–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Keane PA, Allie M, Turner SJ, et al. Characterization of birdshot chorioretinopathy using extramacular enhanced depth optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(3):341–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Gass JDM. Vitiliginous chorioretinitis. Arch Ophthalmol Chic. 1981;99(10):1778–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Reddy AK, Gonzalez MA, Henry CR, Yeh S, Sobrin L, Albini TA. Diagnostic sensitivity of indocyanine green angiography for birdshot chorioretinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(7):840–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Priem HA, De Rouck A, De Laey JJ, Bird AC. Electrophysiologic studies in birdshot chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106(4):430–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Chan CC, Rubenstein JL, Coupland SE, et al. Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: a report from an International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Collaborative Group symposium. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1589–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Coupland SE, Damato B. Understanding intraocular lymphomas. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(6):564–78.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Coupland SE, Foss HD, Hidayat AA, Cockerham GC, Hummel M, Stein H. Extranodal marginal zone B cell lymphomas of the uvea: an analysis of 13 cases. J Pathol. 2002;197(3):333–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Char DH, Ljung BM, Miller T, Phillips T. Primary intraocular lymphoma (ocular reticulum cell sarcoma) diagnosis and management. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(5):625–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Akpek EK, Ahmed I, Hochberg FH, et al. Intraocular-central nervous system lymphoma: clinical features, diagnosis, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(9):1805–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Coupland SE, Heimann H, Bechrakis NE. Primary intraocular lymphoma: a review of the clinical, histopathological and molecular biological features. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(11):901–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Peterson K, Gordon KB, Heinemann MH, DeAngelis LM. The clinical spectrum of ocular lymphoma. Cancer. 1993;72(3):843–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Ridley ME, McDonald HR, Sternberg P Jr, Blumenkranz MS, Zarbin MA, Schachat AP. Retinal manifestations of ocular lymphoma (reticulum cell sarcoma). Ophthalmology. 1992;99(7):1153–60 (discussion 60–1).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Dean JM, Novak MA, Chan CC, Green WR. Tumor detachments of the retinal pigment epithelium in ocular/central nervous system lymphoma. Retina. 1996;16(1):47–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Gass JD, Sever RJ, Grizzard WS, et al. Multifocal pigment epithelial detachments by reticulum cell sarcoma. A characteristic funduscopic picture. Retina. 1984;4(3):135–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Levy-Clarke GA, Chan CC, Nussenblatt RB. Diagnosis and management of primary intraocular lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005;19(4):739–49.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Ishida T, Ohno-Matsui K, Kaneko Y, et al. Fundus autofluorescence patterns in eyes with primary intraocular lymphoma. Retina. 2010;30(1):23–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Shields CL, Pellegrini M, Ferenczy SR, Shields JA. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of intraocular tumors: from placid to seasick to rock and rolling topography—the 2013 Francesco Orzalesi Lecture. Retina. 2014;34(8):1495–512.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Velez G, Chan CC, Csaky KG. Fluorescein angiographic findings in primary intraocular lymphoma. Retina. 2002;22(1):37–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Casady M, Faia L, Nazemzadeh M, Nussenblatt R, Chan CC, Sen HN. Fundus autofluorescence patterns in primary intraocular lymphoma. Retina. 2014;34(2):366–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Aronow ME, Portell CA, Sweetenham JW, Singh AD. Uveal lymphoma: clinical features, diagnostic studies, treatment selection, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):334–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Chan CC, Buggage RR, Nussenblatt RB. Intraocular lymphoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13(6):411–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Fahim DK, Bucher R, Johnson MW. The elusive nature of primary intraocular lymphoma. J Neuroophthalmol. 2005;25(1):33–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Cassoux N, Merle-Beral H, Leblond V, et al. Ocular and central nervous system lymphoma: clinical features and diagnosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2000;8(4):243–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Gass JD, Braunstein RA, Chenoweth RG. Acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinitis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(10):1288–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Burkholder BM, Leung TG, Ostheimer TA, Butler NJ, Thorne JE, Dunn JP. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography findings in acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinitis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2014;4(1):2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Duker JS, Waheed NK, Goldman DR. Acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinitis. In: Duker JS, Waheed NK, Goldman DR, editors. Handbook of retinal OCT: optical coherence tomography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2014. p. 130–1.

  127. 127.

    Joseph A, Rogers S, Browning A, et al. Syphilitic acute posterior placoid chorioretinitis in nonimmuno-compromised patients. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(8):1114–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Menon SR, Fleischhauer J, Jost K, Helbig H. Clinical and electrophysiological course of acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinitis. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005;222(3):261–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Helm CJ, Holland GN. Ocular tuberculosis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(3):229–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Zhang M, Zhang J, Liu Y. Clinical presentations and therapeutic effect of presumed choroidal tuberculosis. Retina. 2012;32(4):805–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Salman A, Parmar P, Rajamohan M, Vanila CG, Thomas PA, Jesudasan CA. Optical coherence tomography in choroidal tuberculosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(1):170–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132

    Gupta V, Gupta A, Sachdeva N, et al. Successful management of tubercular subretinal granulomas. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006;14:35–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133

    Gupta V, Gupta A, Arora S, et al. Presumed tubercular serpiginouslike choroiditis: clinical presentations and management. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1744–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134

    Bialasiewicz AA, Ruprecht KW, Naumann GO, Blenk H. Bilateral diffuse choroiditis and exudative retinal detachments with evidence of Lyme disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;105(4):419–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135

    Schubert HD, Greenebaum E, Neu HC. Cytologically proven seronegative Lyme choroiditis and vitritis. Retina. 1994;14(1):39–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

MR carried out the literature search and review, drafted the manuscript, and composed the MEWDS figure and legend. AR participated in study design, carried out the literature search, and edited the manuscript. JG participated in study design and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. YY and MS edited the manuscript, prepared the image panels, and wrote the figure legends. LF edited the manuscript and participated in analysis of images. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by NEI R01EY021517 (RWN), NEI P30EY016665 (RWN), NEI R01ET021517 (VIS), T32GM081061 (CEM), a Glaucoma Research Foundation Shaffer grant (RWN), and a Research to Prevent Blindness Inc. Unrestricted Grant to the UW Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (RWN).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA

    Meisha L. Raven, Alexander L. Ringeisen & Justin L. Gottlieb

  2. McPherson Eye Research Institute, Madison, WI, USA

    Meisha L. Raven

  3. Associated Retinal Consultants, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA

    Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Maxwell S. Stem & Lisa J. Faia

  4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 2870 University Ave, Room 206, Madison, WI, 53705, USA

    Justin L. Gottlieb

Authors
  1. Meisha L. Raven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander L. Ringeisen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshihiro Yonekawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maxwell S. Stem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lisa J. Faia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Justin L. Gottlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin L. Gottlieb.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raven, M.L., Ringeisen, A.L., Yonekawa, Y. et al. Multi-modal imaging and anatomic classification of the white dot syndromes. Int J Retin Vitr 3, 12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0069-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • White dot syndromes
  • Birdshot chorioretinopathy
  • Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome
  • Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy
  • Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis
  • Serpiginous choroiditis
  • Relentless placoid chorioretinitis
  • Punctate inner choroidopathy
  • Sympathetic ophthalmia
  • Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous

ISSN: 2056-9920

Contact us