- Original article
- Open Access
Identification of epiretinal proliferation in various retinal diseases and vitreoretinal interface disorders
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous volume 6, Article number: 31 (2020)
To describe the presence of epiretinal proliferation in eyes with various retinal and vitreoretinal interface conditions.
Consecutive patients seen at the Stein Eye Institute, by one retina specialist, from December 2018 to March 2019, and demonstrating epiretinal proliferation on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Included patients were divided into two groups: vitreoretinal interface pathologies group or retinal diseases group. Presence of epiretinal proliferation and its localization within the 9 macular sectors, as defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), were assessed on OCT.
77 eyes from 69 patients demonstrated epiretinal proliferation on OCT. The most frequently involved ETDRS sector was the 1-mm central subfield, followed by inner temporal and inner nasal sectors. Localization of epiretinal proliferation correlated with the presence of any retinal abnormalities in the same quadrant (r = 0.962; P < 0.0001). 31 eyes (40.3%) demonstrated symptomatic vitreoretinal interface pathologies including lamellar macular hole, full-thickness macular hole, epiretinal membrane and history of macular peeling. 46 eyes (59.7%) manifested various retinal diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, refractory macular edema, vein occlusion and high myopia.
Epiretinal proliferation was noted in several retinal conditions and not limited only to full-thickness and lamellar macular holes. Different mechanisms affecting retinal homeostasis might trigger Müller cells dysregulation, potentially leading to abnormal retinal remodeling.
Epiretinal proliferation (ERP) has recently been described in eyes with lamellar macular holes . This proliferation was distinguished from epiretinal membrane (ERM) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and defined as an isoreflective space-filling material over the retinal surface, often delimited by a thin highly reflective line, and without tractional properties [1, 2]. Thereafter, this proliferative tissue has also been identified in eyes with full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) and in association with ERM development [3, 4].
While initially suspected to originate from the vitreous, Pang and co-workers noticed that ERP contains mainly Müller glial cells, which makes its genesis from retinal tissue very likely [2, 5]. However, the initial trigger leading to this proliferative process remains poorly understood. Since Müller cells may play a central role in retinal homeostasis, we hypothesized that other macular pathologies, besides LMH and FTMH, might also develop such proliferative tissue. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify the presence of ERP in association with various retinal disorders, and to describe its morphological characteristics on SD-OCT.
This cross-sectional and descriptive study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and to the regulations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of the University of California Los Angeles Office of Human Research Protection (IRB#16-000574). All consecutive patients examined by a single retina specialist (JPH), at the Stein Eye Institute of the University of California Los Angeles, from December 2018 to March 2019, and demonstrating ERP on SD-OCT were enrolled in this study. The main exclusion criteria were uninterpretable or poor-quality SD-OCT scans. Epiretinal proliferation was defined on SD-OCT as a homogenous, non-contractile, iso-reflective layer, and often surrounded by a thin hyperreflective band, as previously described in LMH .
Patient’s clinical charts were reviewed to record significant ocular history, and clinical examination findings including visual acuity (VA) and lens status. Included eyes were divided into two groups: vitreoretinal interface (VRI) pathologies group, which included LMH, FTMH, idiopathic ERM and iatrogenic retinal macular defect, and retinal diseases group which included age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, refractory chronic macular edema and high myopia.
All included eyes were imaged with the Spectralis SD-OCT device (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), and reviewed with the Heidelberg Eye Explorer (version 184.108.40.206) using the HRA/Spectralis Viewing Module (version 220.127.116.11). All OCT scans were analyzed by two graders (MP, IC) to assess the presence of ERP and its localization within the 9 macular sectors, as defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The foveal central subfield corresponding to the inner 1-mm-diameter circle was considered as an individual quadrant; the inner circle subfield was located between the inner and middle 3-mm-diameter circles; and the outer circle subfield between the middle and outer 6-mm-diameter circles (Fig. 1). Both the inner and the outer circles subfield were subdivided into superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal quadrants. Presence of a partial or full-thickness retinal defect, epiretinal membrane, macular edema, pigmentary epithelium detachment (PED), laser scars and outer retinal layers (external limiting membrane and/or ellipsoidal zone) disruption were recorded, and their topographic distribution was correlated with the presence of ERP within the 9 ETDRS sectors. Epiretinal membranes were graded using the staging scheme proposed by Govetto and colleagues .
Descriptive statistics were obtained using XLSTAT software version 2018.1.49572 (Assinsoft, Paris, France). Quantitative values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while qualitative values are listed as ratio and percentage. As this study was an investigative observational analysis, no comparative analyses were performed. Correlations between the location of ERP within the 9-ETDRS quadrants and the presence of SD-OCT retinal abnormalities were assessed using the Pearson’s correlation test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Seventy-seven eyes of 69 patients, 39 (56.5%) female and 30 (43.5%) male, demonstrated ERP on SD-OCT examination and were enrolled in this study. Mean age of patients was 75.7 ± 13.1 years. Thirty-one (40.3%) eyes were included within the VRI group, while 46 (59.7%) eyes were included within the retinal diseases group.
Overall, ERP was noted in 3.1 ± 2.1 (range: 1–9) ETDRS sectors [2.4 ± 1.6 (range: 0–5) within the inner 1-mm-diameter circle or inner ETDRS circle subfield; and 0.6 ± 1.0 (range: 0–4) within the outer ETDRS circle subfield]. The most frequently involved retinal quadrant was the 1-mm central subfield (61/77 eyes, 79.2%), followed by the inner temporal quadrant (44/77 eyes, 57.1%) and the inner nasal quadrant (33/77 eyes, 42.9%). Localization of ERP within the 9 ETDRS sectors was strongly correlated with the presence in the same sector of any retinal lesion, as previously defined (r = 0.962; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1).
Vitreoretinal interface pathologies group
In the VRI pathologies group which includes 31 eyes, 12/31 (38.7%) were diagnosed with LMH, 4/31 (12.9%) with FTMH, 8/31 (25.8%) had idiopathic ERM, and 7/31 (22.6%) eyes had undergone prior macular peeling surgery. Clinical data and SD-OCT features of included eyes within the VRI group are reported in Table 1.
Lamellar macular hole and full-thickness macular hole
In all eyes with either LMH or FTMH, ERP was noted at the edges of the hole (Fig. 2a–f). In LMH eyes, this proliferative tissue appeared connected to the intraretinal layers, within the hole, in all of the 12 cases (Fig. 2b). A macular posterior vitreous detachment was noted in 8 out of 12 (66.7%) LMH eyes, while 2 (16.7%) had a vitreomacular adhesion and 2 (16.7%) had a history of vitrectomy for retinal detachment. Interestingly, in one LMH with vitreomacular adhesion, ERP appeared to be in continuity with the bottom of the hole and to spread out above the posterior hyaloid (Fig. 2c).
Two eyes manifested a stage 4 FTMH (Fig. 2d) and one eye had a chronic macular hole (Fig. 2e). The latter displayed intraretinal edema at the nasal edge of the retina also involving the overlying ERP. Finally, one FTMH eye was diagnosed with macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel), and had a history of FTMH surgery (Fig. 2f).
Idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Epiretinal proliferation was noted in association with idiopathic ERM in 8 eyes (3 stage 1, 3 stage 2, 2 stage 3 and 1 stage 4) (Fig. 2g–i). Based on SD-OCT analysis, the proliferative tissue was considered to be above the ERM in 6 out of 8 eyes, and between the retinal surface and the ERM in 2 out of 8 eyes.
Previous macular peeling surgery
Seven eyes displayed ERP after macular peeling surgery for ERM (4/7 eyes) (Fig. 2j), FTMH (2/7 eyes) and LMH (1/7 eyes). This proliferative material was noted in the parafoveal area, and collocated with a deep inner retinal defect (Fig. 2k) in 3 cases, and with dissociation of optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) but without visible retinal defect in 2 cases. Finally, 2 eyes had irregular foveal contour after LMH (1 eye) and FTMH (1 eye) (Fig. 2l) surgery and demonstrated ERP in the 1-mm central area, which seemed to fill the irregularities of the retinal surface.
Retinal conditions group
In the retinal diseases group, encountered pathologies were AMD (14/46 eyes, 30.4%), diabetic retinopathy (10/46 eyes, 21.2%), refractory chronic macular edema (10/46 eyes, 21.2%), vein occlusion (8/46 eyes, 17.4%) and high myopia (4 eyes, 8.7%). Clinical data and SD-OCT features of included eyes within the retinal diseases group are reported in Table 2.
Seventeen out of 46 (37.0%) eyes had macular edema on SD-OCT examination. There was a strong correlation between the localization of macular cysts and epiretinal proliferation within the 9-ETDRS quadrants (r = 0.790; P = 0.011) (Fig. 3). Additionally, 15/46 eyes (32.6%) had focal or pan-retinal laser treatment. Laser scars were visible on SD-OCT in 6 eyes, among which ERP was noted at the edges of laser scars in 5 cases.
Age-related macular degeneration
Eight out of fourteen eyes (57.1%) with AMD were treated by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection for active neovascularization (Fig. 4a). On SD-OCT scans, 10 of 14 eyes (71.4%) displayed pigment epithelium detachment (PED). In eyes with PED, localization of ERP within the different ETDRS quadrants was correlated with localization of PED (r = 0.847; P = 0.004).
Ten eyes demonstrated diabetic retinopathy, of which 9 (90.0%) had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (Figs. 4d–f), and one (10.0%) eye had severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). All diabetic eyes had a history of macular edema. Eight of 10 (80.0%) eyes received anti-VEGF intravitreal injection, 1/10 (10.0%) received intravitreal dexamethasone implant and 1/10 (10.0%) received both. Additionally, 9 out of 10 (90.0%) eyes had pan-retinal laser photocoagulation, and two eyes (20.0%) also had focal macular laser treatment.
Refractory chronic macular edema
Among the 10 eyes with refractory macular edema, 5 (50%) eyes had chronic macular edema after retinal detachment repair (Fig. 4h), 3 (30%) eyes had refractory pseudophakic macular edema (Fig. 4g), 1 (10%) eye was followed for idiopathic posterior uveitis, and 1 (10%) eye had hypotony maculopathy (Fig. 4i). All of these eyes presented chronic macular edema and had limited visual acuity [0.74 ± 0.69 (range: 0.1–1.98) LogMAR, (20/110 Snellen equivalent)]. Three of ten (30.0%) eyes had been treated with anti-VEGF therapy, 3/10 (30.0%) with intravitreal dexamethasone implant and 2/10 (20.0%) with both.
Two eyes had a central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) (Fig. 4j), and six eyes had a branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) (Figs. 4k, l). In eyes with BRVO, epiretinal proliferation was systematically noted in the retinal area corresponding to the occluded branch vessel. All eyes were treated for macular edema, among which 5 received anti-VEGF injection, 1 received dexamethasone implant and 1 received both. Six out of 10 eyes (60%) had previous pan-retinal laser photocoagulation.
Finally, four eyes had a high myopia with posterior staphyloma, but without other retinal conditions or history of choroidal neovascularization (Fig. 4b, c).
Epiretinal proliferation has been described in LMH and FTMH, where the alteration typically occurs at the edges of the hole [1, 7, 8]. More recently, Itoh and colleagues reported its presence in association with ERM development . In their study, they reported hyporeflective proliferation in 19 out of 3291 eyes with ERM. Consistently, co-existence of both ERM and ERP has been demonstrated by Schuman and co-workers . Using SD-OCT imaging and ultrastructural analysis, they noticed presence of both tissues with close proximity in a two-layer complex, in different vitreoretinal pathologies. In the present paper, we identified ERP in eyes with different VRI disorders, but also in eyes with various retinal conditions, including vascular, inflammatory and degenerative diseases, using SD-OCT. This suggests that different signals may trigger this proliferative process .
Histological studies in LMH have reported that ERP consists of retinal glial cells, specifically Müller cells, and lacks myofibroblasts [5, 9]. Conversely, idiopathic ERM consists mainly of hyalocytes, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, which explain their tractional properties. Macroscopically, ERP had a yellow appearance when in the foveal area, which may be explained by the presence of xanthophyll pigments, as demonstrated by Obana and colleagues [9, 11]. This reinforces the suggestion that Müller cells are the main constituent of ERP, and that it originates from the retinal tissue . Nevertheless, the exact pathogenesis of ERP remains poorly understood. One suggestion was that this proliferation develops in association with inner retinal defects . Consistently, in eyes with LMH, FTMH or iatrogenic inner retinal defects, ERP was present on the retinal surface at the edges of the lesions. However, it remains unclear if the proliferation is initially originating from the retinal defect, or growing over the retinal surface toward the retinal defect. In all LMH eyes, ERP was found to be connected with retinal layers within the hole, rendering the latter hypothesis unlikely. In ERM eyes, as in eyes within the retinal diseases group in the present study, no break within the retinal tissue were visible, and therefore a clinically significant retinal defect does not seem to be a required condition for ERP development. However, focal opening in the internal limiting membrane induced by vitreous traction may be present, even if undetectable by SD-OCT examination . Alternatively, it is possible that stretching of glial Müller cells by oblique anteroposterior vitreous traction in case of FTMH, or tangential traction in case of ERM may be sufficient mechanical factors to activate glial cells leading to ERP development [14, 15].
After macular peeling surgery, ERP was noted at the edges of inner retinal defect, but also in association with dissociation of optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL), visualized on OCT scans as retinal dimples. This change in inner retinal morphology is thought to be due to injury to the Müller cell footplates by peeling off the internal limiting membrane [16, 17]. While inner retinal dimples tend to increase over the first 6 months after surgery, it has been shown that their appearance decreases after 12 months, suggesting a gradual regeneration of Müller cell processes . Thus, the mechanical stimuli induced by ILM peeling may trigger reactive gliosis, which may be sufficient to explain ERP development.
Epiretinal proliferation was also present in eyes with various retinal diseases, and without apparent VRI abnormalities. Interestingly, in eyes with macular edema, localization of ERP within the different ETDRS quadrants matched with the morphological distribution of intraretinal fluid. Müller cells are known to be one of the key player controlling retinal homeostasis and fluid movement into and out of the retina . Chronic accumulation of intraretinal fluid may over-stimulate Müller cells, and may lead to expansion of retinal tissue and stretching of the Müller cells, contributing to glial cells hypertrophy and proliferation [15, 20]. While macular edema was associated with ERP development, 6/14 (42.9%) eyes with AMD had no history of macular edema. Hence, additional stimuli may have contributed to glial cells stimulation, and we notably found that the localization of ERP within the ETDRS quadrants was correlated with the localization of PED. Even though the role of retinal glial cells in AMD pathogenesis has been sparsely studied, astrocytes and Müller cells are known to play a role in AMD development, with notably gliosis of Müller cells [21, 22]. Almost a third of eyes in retinal diseases group had a history of retinal laser treatment, and we noted in five eyes presence of proliferative tissue along the border of the laser scars. Thus, retinal laser treatment seemed to induce a gliotic reaction. Consistent with this hypothesis, a previous experimental study noted activation of Müller cells at the burn site of laser, followed by proliferation and migration of these glial cells .
Overall, presence of ERP was found to be correlated with a variety of significant retinal alterations, including partial inner or full-thickness retinal defect, ERM, intraretinal cysts, PED and outer retinal layers disruption. The most frequently involved retinal quadrant was the 1-mm central subfield (as for the retinal pathology), and ERP was also more frequently present in the temporal than the nasal macula. This could be explained by a greater Müller cell densities in the central fovea and temporal retina . However, ERP may also be found in paracentral macula away from the foveal center in cases of extrafoveal iatrogenic retinal defect. Hence, development of ERP and its location within the retina seemed more correlated with the presence of any retinal lesions . Indeed, all retinal injuries may potentially trigger hypertrophy, proliferation and migration of Müller cells .
This Müller cell gliosis may either have protective or toxic effects on photoreceptors and retinal homeostasis [10, 20]. While proliferative gliosis may contribute to acceleration of neurodegeneration in chronic diseases such as AMD and diabetic retinopathy; activated Müller cells may also have neuroprotective effect after retinal injury. Indeed, there is emerging evidence suggesting that Müller glial cells are dormant stem-like cells with regenerative properties . Therefore, development of ERP in eyes with different retinal conditions may represent a spontaneous cellular attempt to protect the retinal tissue from further damage, and to contribute to retinal tissue repair [25, 26].
Limitations of our study are its cross-sectional and non-comparative design, and the lack of scans in the outer macular area in a subset of patient. While a 30 × 25-degree macular raster was required to assess the presence of proliferation within the different ETDRS quadrants, some patients had only a 30 × 15-degree macular raster, and therefore the rate of superior and inferior outer sectors involved may have been underestimated. Absence of longitudinal evaluation did not permit evaluation of whether ERP development contributed to retinal repair or rather to progressive retinal degeneration, and the lack of comparative group did not allow evaluation of potential risk factors for ERP development. However, this descriptive study did include a broad spectrum of VRI and retinal conditions, in order to demonstrate that this proliferative tissue is not limited to LMH and FTMH, but may also occur in response to various retinal alterations. Further studies including a more homogenous population would be necessary to study specific risk factors and prognostic factors for ERP development.
In conclusion, this study highlights the presence of ERP in eyes with various conditions. While this proliferative tissue was initially described as a marker of severity for LMH/FTMH, it may actually result from a regenerative process involving Müller glial cells proliferation in response to retinal injury. Virtually all retinal pathogenic stimuli may activate Müller cells, and therefore, ERP may occur in response to different stimuli such as retinal edema, laser retinopexy, or choroidal neovascularization.
Availability of data and materials
All deidentified and coded data of patients included in the study are available by request.
Age-related macular degeneration
Branch retinal vein occlusion
Central retinal vein occlusion
Dissociation of optic nerve fiber layer
External limiting membrane
Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study
Full-thickness macular holes
Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation
Lamellar macular hole
Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution
Pigmentary epithelium detachment
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Pang CE, Spaide RF, Freund KB. Epiretinal proliferation seen in association with lamellar macular holes: a distinct clinical entity. Retina. 2014;34:1513–23.
Compera D, Entchev E, Haritoglou C, et al. Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in comparison to epiretinal membranes of macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:373–84.
Itoh Y, Levison AL, Kaiser PK, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of hyporeflective preretinal tissue in vitreomacular interface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:399–404.
Lee Kim E, Weiner AJ, Ung C, et al. Characterization of epiretinal proliferation in full-thickness macular holes and effects on surgical outcomes. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3:694–702.
Pang CE, Maberley DA, Freund KB, et al. Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation: a clinicopathologic correlation. Retina. 2016;36:1408–12.
Govetto A, Lalane RA, Sarraf D, et al. Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:99–113.
Pang CE, Spaide RF, Freund KB. Comparing functional and morphologic characteristics of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. Retina. 2015;35:720–6.
Francone A, Essilfie J, Sarraf D, et al. Effect of laser photocoagulation on macular edema associated with macular holes. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICB.0000000000000901.
Schumann RG, Hagenau F, Guenther SR, et al. Premacular cell proliferation profiles in tangential traction vitreo-maculopathies suggest a key role for hyalocytes. Ophthalmologica. 2019;242:106–12.
Bringmann A, Iandiev I, Pannicke T, et al. Cellular signaling and factors involved in Müller cell gliosis: neuroprotective and detrimental effects. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009;28:423–51.
Obana A, Sasano H, Okazaki S, et al. Evidence of carotenoid in surgically removed lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5157–63.
Gass JD. Müller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its role in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacular retinoschisis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:821–3.
Bovey EH, Uffer S. Tearing and folding of the retinal internal limiting membrane associated with macular epiretinal membrane. Retina. 2008;28:433–40.
Matet A, Savastano MC, Rispoli M, et al. En face optical coherence tomography of foveal microstructure in full-thickness macular hole: a model to study perifoveal Müller cells. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:1142–51.
Govetto A, Bhavsar KV, Virgili G, et al. Tractional abnormalities of the central foveal bouquet in epiretinal membranes: clinical spectrum and pathophysiological perspectives. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;184:167–80.
Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2279–83.
Amouyal F, Shah SU, Pan CK, Schwartz SD, Hubschman J-P. Morphologic features and evolution of inner retinal dimples on optical coherence tomography after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina. 2014;34:2096–102.
Nakamura T, Murata T, Hisatomi T, et al. Ultrastructure of the vitreoretinal interface following the removal of the internal limiting membrane using indocyanine green. Curr Eye Res. 2003;27:395–9.
Spaide RF. Retinal vascular cystoid macular edema: review and new theory. Retina. 2016;36:1823–42.
Bringmann A, Wiedemann P. Müller glial cells in retinal disease. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227:1–19.
Telegina DV, Kozhevnikova OS, Bayborodin SI, Kolosova NG. Contributions of age-related alterations of the retinal pigment epithelium and of glia to the AMD-like pathology in OXYS rats. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41533.
Telegina DV, Kozhevnikova OS, Kolosova NG. Changes in retinal glial cells with age and during development of age-related macular degeneration. Biochem Mosc. 2018;83:1009–17.
Tackenberg MA, Tucker BA, Swift JS, et al. Müller cell activation, proliferation and migration following laser injury. Mol Vis. 2009;15:1886–96.
Distler C, Dreher Z. Glia cells of the monkey retina–II. Müller cells. Vision Res. 1996;36:2381–94.
Lenkowski JR, Raymond PA. Müller glia: stem cells for generation and regeneration of retinal neurons in teleost fish. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2014;40:94–123.
Yao K, Qiu S, Wang YV, et al. Restoration of vision after de novo genesis of rod photoreceptors in mammalian retinas. Nature. 2018;560:484–8.
Supported by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness and the Hess Foundation, which had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the University of California Los Angeles Office of Human Research Protection (IRB#16-000574).
Consent for publication
Jean-Pierre Hubschman: Alcon (C), Allergan (C), Bausch and Lomb (C), Novartis (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec (C); SriniVas R. Sadda: Amgen (C), Allergan (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec (F), CenterVue (C), Genentech (C), Heidelberg engineering (C,F), 4DMT (C), Novartis (C), Optos (C), Oxurion (C), Samsung Biopses (C). The following authors have no financial disclosures: Ismael Chehaibou; Moritz Pettenkofer; Andrea Govetto; Gilad Rabina.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chehaibou, I., Pettenkofer, M., Govetto, A. et al. Identification of epiretinal proliferation in various retinal diseases and vitreoretinal interface disorders. Int J Retin Vitr 6, 31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00233-0
- Epiretinal membrane
- Epiretinal proliferation
- Full-thickness macular holes
- Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation
- Lamellar macular holes
- Macular edema
- Müller glial cells
- Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography